These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29746620)

  • 1. Grouper: graph-based clustering and annotation for improved de novo transcriptome analysis.
    Malik L; Almodaresi F; Patro R
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Oct; 34(19):3265-3272. PubMed ID: 29746620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Compacta: a fast contig clustering tool for de novo assembled transcriptomes.
    Razo-Mendivil FG; Martínez O; Hayano-Kanashiro C
    BMC Genomics; 2020 Feb; 21(1):148. PubMed ID: 32046653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimization of de novo transcriptome assembly from high-throughput short read sequencing data improves functional annotation for non-model organisms.
    Haznedaroglu BZ; Reeves D; Rismani-Yazdi H; Peccia J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Jul; 13():170. PubMed ID: 22808927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. BRANCH: boosting RNA-Seq assemblies with partial or related genomic sequences.
    Bao E; Jiang T; Girke T
    Bioinformatics; 2013 May; 29(10):1250-9. PubMed ID: 23493323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative performance of transcriptome assembly methods for non-model organisms.
    Huang X; Chen XG; Armbruster PA
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Jul; 17():523. PubMed ID: 27464550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. RapMap: a rapid, sensitive and accurate tool for mapping RNA-seq reads to transcriptomes.
    Srivastava A; Sarkar H; Gupta N; Patro R
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Jun; 32(12):i192-i200. PubMed ID: 27307617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. CAARS: comparative assembly and annotation of RNA-Seq data.
    Rey C; Veber P; Boussau B; Sémon M
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Jul; 35(13):2199-2207. PubMed ID: 30452539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comprehensive evaluation of de novo transcriptome assembly programs and their effects on differential gene expression analysis.
    Wang S; Gribskov M
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Feb; 33(3):327-333. PubMed ID: 28172640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inferring bona fide transfrags in RNA-Seq derived-transcriptome assemblies of non-model organisms.
    Mbandi SK; Hesse U; van Heusden P; Christoffels A
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Feb; 16(1):58. PubMed ID: 25880035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Informed kmer selection for de novo transcriptome assembly.
    Durai DA; Schulz MH
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Jun; 32(11):1670-7. PubMed ID: 27153653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A survey of the complex transcriptome from the highly polyploid sugarcane genome using full-length isoform sequencing and de novo assembly from short read sequencing.
    Hoang NV; Furtado A; Mason PJ; Marquardt A; Kasirajan L; Thirugnanasambandam PP; Botha FC; Henry RJ
    BMC Genomics; 2017 May; 18(1):395. PubMed ID: 28532419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improved annotation with de novo transcriptome assembly in four social amoeba species.
    Singh R; Lawal HM; Schilde C; Glöckner G; Barton GJ; Schaap P; Cole C
    BMC Genomics; 2017 Jan; 18(1):120. PubMed ID: 28143409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Challenges and advances for transcriptome assembly in non-model species.
    Ungaro A; Pech N; Martin JF; McCairns RJS; Mévy JP; Chappaz R; Gilles A
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0185020. PubMed ID: 28931057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. ChopStitch: exon annotation and splice graph construction using transcriptome assembly and whole genome sequencing data.
    Khan H; Mohamadi H; Vandervalk BP; Warren RL; Chu J; Birol I
    Bioinformatics; 2018 May; 34(10):1697-1704. PubMed ID: 29300846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. FRAMA: from RNA-seq data to annotated mRNA assemblies.
    Bens M; Sahm A; Groth M; Jahn N; Morhart M; Holtze S; Hildebrandt TB; Platzer M; Szafranski K
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Jan; 17():54. PubMed ID: 26763976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. TraRECo: a greedy approach based de novo transcriptome assembler with read error correction using consensus matrix.
    Yoon S; Kim D; Kang K; Park WJ
    BMC Genomics; 2018 Sep; 19(1):653. PubMed ID: 30180798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Combining independent de novo assemblies optimizes the coding transcriptome for nonconventional model eukaryotic organisms.
    Cerveau N; Jackson DJ
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Dec; 17(1):525. PubMed ID: 27938328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. PARRoT- a homology-based strategy to quantify and compare RNA-sequencing from non-model organisms.
    Gan RC; Chen TW; Wu TH; Huang PJ; Lee CC; Yeh YM; Chiu CH; Huang HD; Tang P
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Dec; 17(Suppl 19):513. PubMed ID: 28155708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A high-quality annotated transcriptome of swine peripheral blood.
    Liu H; Smith TPL; Nonneman DJ; Dekkers JCM; Tuggle CK
    BMC Genomics; 2017 Jun; 18(1):479. PubMed ID: 28646867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. 454 pyrosequencing-based analysis of gene expression profiles in the amphipod Melita plumulosa: transcriptome assembly and toxicant induced changes.
    Hook SE; Twine NA; Simpson SL; Spadaro DA; Moncuquet P; Wilkins MR
    Aquat Toxicol; 2014 Aug; 153():73-88. PubMed ID: 24434169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.