BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29746666)

  • 41. Linear-Time Algorithms for RNA Structure Prediction.
    Zhang H; Zhang L; Liu K; Li S; Mathews DH; Huang L
    Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2586():15-34. PubMed ID: 36705896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Design, implementation and evaluation of a practical pseudoknot folding algorithm based on thermodynamics.
    Reeder J; Giegerich R
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Aug; 5():104. PubMed ID: 15294028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. PseudoViewer3: generating planar drawings of large-scale RNA structures with pseudoknots.
    Byun Y; Han K
    Bioinformatics; 2009 Jun; 25(11):1435-7. PubMed ID: 19369500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Estimating Energy Parameters for RNA Secondary Structure Predictions Using Both Experimental and Computational Data.
    Nishida S; Sakuraba S; Asai K; Hamada M
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2019; 16(5):1645-1655. PubMed ID: 29994069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. RnaPredict--an evolutionary algorithm for RNA secondary structure prediction.
    Wiese K; Deschenes A; Hendriks A
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2008; 5(1):25-41. PubMed ID: 18245873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Prediction of RNA secondary structure with pseudoknots using integer programming.
    Poolsap U; Kato Y; Akutsu T
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Jan; 10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S38. PubMed ID: 19208139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. K-partite RNA secondary structures.
    Jiang M; Tejada PJ; Lasisi RO; Cheng S; Fechser DS
    J Comput Biol; 2010 Jul; 17(7):915-25. PubMed ID: 20632871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Thermodynamics of RNA structures by Wang-Landau sampling.
    Lou F; Clote P
    Bioinformatics; 2010 Jun; 26(12):i278-86. PubMed ID: 20529917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Prediction of RNA secondary structure by free energy minimization.
    Mathews DH; Turner DH
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2006 Jun; 16(3):270-8. PubMed ID: 16713706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A statistical analysis of RNA folding algorithms through thermodynamic parameter perturbation.
    Layton DM; Bundschuh R
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2005; 33(2):519-24. PubMed ID: 15673712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Using an RNA secondary structure partition function to determine confidence in base pairs predicted by free energy minimization.
    Mathews DH
    RNA; 2004 Aug; 10(8):1178-90. PubMed ID: 15272118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Influence of two bulge loops on the stability of RNA duplexes.
    Crowther CV; Jones LE; Morelli JN; Mastrogiacomo EM; Porterfield C; Kent JL; Serra MJ
    RNA; 2017 Feb; 23(2):217-228. PubMed ID: 27872162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. GTfold: enabling parallel RNA secondary structure prediction on multi-core desktops.
    Swenson MS; Anderson J; Ash A; Gaurav P; Sükösd Z; Bader DA; Harvey SC; Heitsch CE
    BMC Res Notes; 2012 Jul; 5():341. PubMed ID: 22747589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [RNA secondary structure prediction based on support vector machine classification].
    Zhao Y; Wang Z
    Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao; 2008 Jul; 24(7):1140-8. PubMed ID: 18837386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Partition function and base pairing probabilities for RNA-RNA interaction prediction.
    Huang FW; Qin J; Reidys CM; Stadler PF
    Bioinformatics; 2009 Oct; 25(20):2646-54. PubMed ID: 19671692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Base-pair ambiguity and the kinetics of RNA folding.
    Zhou G; Loper J; Geman S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Dec; 20(1):666. PubMed ID: 31830902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. RNA secondary structure prediction from multi-aligned sequences.
    Hamada M
    Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1269():17-38. PubMed ID: 25577370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Integrating thermodynamic and sequence contexts improves protein-RNA binding prediction.
    Su Y; Luo Y; Zhao X; Liu Y; Peng J
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Sep; 15(9):e1007283. PubMed ID: 31483777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. SCFGs in RNA secondary structure prediction RNA secondary structure prediction: a hands-on approach.
    Sükösd Z; Andersen ES; Lyngsø R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1097():143-62. PubMed ID: 24639159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Computational analysis of RNA structures with chemical probing data.
    Ge P; Zhang S
    Methods; 2015 Jun; 79-80():60-6. PubMed ID: 25687190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.