These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29746773)

  • 1. Green Functions and Self-Consistency: Insights From the Spherium Model.
    Loos PF; Romaniello P; Berger JA
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2018 Jun; 14(6):3071-3082. PubMed ID: 29746773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Potential Energy Surfaces without Unphysical Discontinuities: The Coulomb Hole Plus Screened Exchange Approach.
    Berger JA; Loos PF; Romaniello P
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2021 Jan; 17(1):191-200. PubMed ID: 33306908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An optimally tuned range-separated hybrid starting point for ab initio GW plus Bethe-Salpeter equation calculations of molecules.
    McKeon CA; Hamed SM; Bruneval F; Neaton JB
    J Chem Phys; 2022 Aug; 157(7):074103. PubMed ID: 35987597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Screening mixing GW/Bethe-Salpeter approach for triplet states of organic molecules.
    Ziaei V; Bredow T
    J Phys Condens Matter; 2018 Oct; 30(39):395501. PubMed ID: 30124435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Time-Dependent Second-Order Green's Function Theory for Neutral Excitations.
    Dou W; Lee J; Zhu J; Mejía L; Reichman DR; Baer R; Rabani E
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2022 Sep; 18(9):5221-5232. PubMed ID: 36040050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accurate Ionization Potentials and Electron Affinities of Acceptor Molecules III: A Benchmark of GW Methods.
    Knight JW; Wang X; Gallandi L; Dolgounitcheva O; Ren X; Ortiz JV; Rinke P; Körzdörfer T; Marom N
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2016 Feb; 12(2):615-26. PubMed ID: 26731609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Helium Atom Excitations by the GW and Bethe-Salpeter Many-Body Formalism.
    Li J; Holzmann M; Duchemin I; Blase X; Olevano V
    Phys Rev Lett; 2017 Apr; 118(16):163001. PubMed ID: 28474954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Numerically Precise Benchmark of Many-Body Self-Energies on Spherical Atoms.
    Vacondio S; Varsano D; Ruini A; Ferretti A
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2022 Jun; 18(6):3703-3717. PubMed ID: 35561415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Scrutinizing GW-Based Methods Using the Hubbard Dimer.
    Di Sabatino S; Loos PF; Romaniello P
    Front Chem; 2021; 9():751054. PubMed ID: 34778206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High accuracy many-body calculational approaches for excitations in molecules.
    Grossman JC; Rohlfing M; Mitas L; Louie SG; Cohen ML
    Phys Rev Lett; 2001 Jan; 86(3):472-5. PubMed ID: 11177858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A systematic benchmark of the ab initio Bethe-Salpeter equation approach for low-lying optical excitations of small organic molecules.
    Bruneval F; Hamed SM; Neaton JB
    J Chem Phys; 2015 Jun; 142(24):244101. PubMed ID: 26133404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy Assessment of GW Starting Points for Calculating Molecular Excitation Energies Using the Bethe-Salpeter Formalism.
    Gui X; Holzer C; Klopper W
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2018 Apr; 14(4):2127-2136. PubMed ID: 29499116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Many-body Green's function GW and Bethe-Salpeter study of the optical excitations in a paradigmatic model dipeptide.
    Faber C; Boulanger P; Duchemin I; Attaccalite C; Blase X
    J Chem Phys; 2013 Nov; 139(19):194308. PubMed ID: 24320327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Benchmarking the GW Approximation and Bethe-Salpeter Equation for Groups IB and IIB Atoms and Monoxides.
    Hung L; Bruneval F; Baishya K; Öğüt S
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2017 May; 13(5):2135-2146. PubMed ID: 28387124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Combining Renormalized Singles
    Li J; Golze D; Yang W
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2022 Nov; 18(11):6637-6645. PubMed ID: 36279250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is the Bethe-Salpeter Formalism Accurate for Excitation Energies? Comparisons with TD-DFT, CASPT2, and EOM-CCSD.
    Jacquemin D; Duchemin I; Blase X
    J Phys Chem Lett; 2017 Apr; 8(7):1524-1529. PubMed ID: 28301726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. NMR Coupling Constants Based on the Bethe-Salpeter Equation in the
    Franzke YJ; Holzer C; Mack F
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2022 Feb; 18(2):1030-1045. PubMed ID: 34981925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spin-Conserved and Spin-Flip Optical Excitations from the Bethe-Salpeter Equation Formalism.
    Monino E; Loos PF
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2021 May; 17(5):2852-2867. PubMed ID: 33724811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Communication: A hybrid Bethe-Salpeter/time-dependent density-functional-theory approach for excitation energies.
    Holzer C; Klopper W
    J Chem Phys; 2018 Sep; 149(10):101101. PubMed ID: 30219024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Static correlation beyond the random phase approximation: dissociating H2 with the Bethe-Salpeter equation and time-dependent GW.
    Olsen T; Thygesen KS
    J Chem Phys; 2014 Apr; 140(16):164116. PubMed ID: 24784262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.