BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29746906)

  • 1. Multi-subject hierarchical inverse covariance modelling improves estimation of functional brain networks.
    Colclough GL; Woolrich MW; Harrison SJ; Rojas López PA; Valdes-Sosa PA; Smith SM
    Neuroimage; 2018 Sep; 178():370-384. PubMed ID: 29746906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dynamic effective connectivity in resting state fMRI.
    Park HJ; Friston KJ; Pae C; Park B; Razi A
    Neuroimage; 2018 Oct; 180(Pt B):594-608. PubMed ID: 29158202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sparse Graphical Models for Functional Connectivity Networks: Best Methods and the Autocorrelation Issue.
    Zhu Y; Cribben I
    Brain Connect; 2018 Apr; 8(3):139-165. PubMed ID: 29634321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bayesian networks for fMRI: a primer.
    Mumford JA; Ramsey JD
    Neuroimage; 2014 Feb; 86():573-82. PubMed ID: 24140939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bayesian modeling of dependence in brain connectivity data.
    Chen S; Xing Y; Kang J; Kochunov P; Hong LE
    Biostatistics; 2020 Apr; 21(2):269-286. PubMed ID: 30203093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improved estimation of subject-level functional connectivity using full and partial correlation with empirical Bayes shrinkage.
    Mejia AF; Nebel MB; Barber AD; Choe AS; Pekar JJ; Caffo BS; Lindquist MA
    Neuroimage; 2018 May; 172():478-491. PubMed ID: 29391241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. SPARK: Sparsity-based analysis of reliable k-hubness and overlapping network structure in brain functional connectivity.
    Lee K; Lina JM; Gotman J; Grova C
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jul; 134():434-449. PubMed ID: 27046111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Hierarchical Bayesian Mixture Model Approach for Analysis of Resting-State Functional Brain Connectivity: An Alternative to Thresholding.
    Gorbach T; Lundquist A; de Luna X; Nyberg L; Salami A
    Brain Connect; 2020 Jun; 10(5):202-211. PubMed ID: 32308015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Structurally-informed Bayesian functional connectivity analysis.
    Hinne M; Ambrogioni L; Janssen RJ; Heskes T; van Gerven MA
    Neuroimage; 2014 Feb; 86():294-305. PubMed ID: 24121202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Integrative Bayesian analysis of brain functional networks incorporating anatomical knowledge.
    Higgins IA; Kundu S; Guo Y
    Neuroimage; 2018 Nov; 181():263-278. PubMed ID: 30017786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Time-dependence of graph theory metrics in functional connectivity analysis.
    Chiang S; Cassese A; Guindani M; Vannucci M; Yeh HJ; Haneef Z; Stern JM
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 125():601-615. PubMed ID: 26518632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bayesian Estimation of Conditional Independence Graphs Improves Functional Connectivity Estimates.
    Hinne M; Janssen RJ; Heskes T; van Gerven MA
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 Nov; 11(11):e1004534. PubMed ID: 26540089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A generative model of whole-brain effective connectivity.
    Frässle S; Lomakina EI; Kasper L; Manjaly ZM; Leff A; Pruessmann KP; Buhmann JM; Stephan KE
    Neuroimage; 2018 Oct; 179():505-529. PubMed ID: 29807151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differential Covariance: A New Method to Estimate Functional Connectivity in fMRI.
    Lin TW; Chen Y; Bukhari Q; Krishnan GP; Bazhenov M; Sejnowski TJ
    Neural Comput; 2020 Dec; 32(12):2389-2421. PubMed ID: 32946714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A predictor-informed multi-subject bayesian approach for dynamic functional connectivity.
    Lee J; Hussain S; Warnick R; Vannucci M; Menchaca I; Seitz AR; Hu X; Peters MAK; Guindani M
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(5):e0298651. PubMed ID: 38753655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bayesian switching factor analysis for estimating time-varying functional connectivity in fMRI.
    Taghia J; Ryali S; Chen T; Supekar K; Cai W; Menon V
    Neuroimage; 2017 Jul; 155():271-290. PubMed ID: 28267626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predicting individual brain functional connectivity using a Bayesian hierarchical model.
    Dai T; Guo Y;
    Neuroimage; 2017 Feb; 147():772-787. PubMed ID: 27915121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimation of Directed Effective Connectivity from fMRI Functional Connectivity Hints at Asymmetries of Cortical Connectome.
    Gilson M; Moreno-Bote R; Ponce-Alvarez A; Ritter P; Deco G
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2016 Mar; 12(3):e1004762. PubMed ID: 26982185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A novel sparse group Gaussian graphical model for functional connectivity estimation.
    Ng B; Varoquaux G; Poline JB; Thirion B
    Inf Process Med Imaging; 2013; 23():256-67. PubMed ID: 24683974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Construct validation of a DCM for resting state fMRI.
    Razi A; Kahan J; Rees G; Friston KJ
    Neuroimage; 2015 Feb; 106():1-14. PubMed ID: 25463471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.