240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29747071)
1. Internal Consistency of the SF-6D as a Health Status Index in the Brazilian Urban Population.
Campolina AG; López RVM; Nardi EP; Ferraz MB
Value Health Reg Issues; 2018 Dec; 17():74-80. PubMed ID: 29747071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Comparison of UK and Brazilian SF-6D Preference Weights When Applied to a Brazilian Urban Population.
Ferraz MB; Nardi EP; Campolina AG
Value Health Reg Issues; 2019 Dec; 20():21-27. PubMed ID: 30634088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Brazilian urban population norms derived from the health-related quality of life SF-6D.
Ciconelli RM; Ferraz MB; Kowalski S; Pinheiro Gda R; Sato EI
Qual Life Res; 2015 Oct; 24(10):2559-64. PubMed ID: 25894065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of utility measurement using EQ-5D and SF-6D preference-based generic instruments in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Salaffi F; Carotti M; Ciapetti A; Gasparini S; Grassi W
Clin Exp Rheumatol; 2011; 29(4):661-71. PubMed ID: 21813061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An investigation into the empirical validity of the EQ-5D and SF-6D based on hypothetical preferences in a general population.
Petrou S; Hockley C
Health Econ; 2005 Nov; 14(11):1169-89. PubMed ID: 15942981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Translation, Cultural Adaptation, and Validation of Short-Form 6D on the General Population in Indonesia.
Andayani TM; Kristina SA; Endarti D; Haris RNH; Rahmawati A
Value Health Reg Issues; 2020 May; 21():205-210. PubMed ID: 32299053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Stoma Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With a Colostomy or Ileostomy in Brazil: A Cross-sectional Study.
Lívia de Oliveira A; Loures Mendes L; Pereira Netto M; Gonçalves Leite IC
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2017 May; 63(5):34-41. PubMed ID: 28570247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Extension from inpatients to outpatients: validity and reliability of the Oxford Knee Score in measuring health outcomes in patients with knee osteoarthritis.
Xie F; Ye H; Zhang Y; Liu X; Lei T; Li SC
Int J Rheum Dis; 2011 May; 14(2):206-10. PubMed ID: 21518321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quality of life in cochlear implantees: comparing utility values obtained through the Medical Outcome Study Short-Form Survey-6D and the Health Utility Index Mark 3.
Arnoldner C; Lin VY; Bresler R; Kaider A; Kuthubutheen J; Shipp D; Chen JM
Laryngoscope; 2014 Nov; 124(11):2586-90. PubMed ID: 24536018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Estimating the SF-6D value set for a population-based sample of Brazilians.
Cruz LN; Camey SA; Hoffmann JF; Rowen D; Brazier JE; Fleck MP; Polanczyk CA
Value Health; 2011; 14(5 Suppl 1):S108-14. PubMed ID: 21839880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of EQ-5D and SF-6D utilities in Pompe disease.
Kanters TA; Redekop WK; Kruijshaar ME; van der Ploeg AT; Rutten-van Mölken MP; Hakkaart L
Qual Life Res; 2015 Apr; 24(4):837-44. PubMed ID: 25342117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Translation into Brazilian Portuguese and validation of the Work Limitations Questionnaire].
de Soárez PC; Kowalski CC; Ferraz MB; Ciconelli RM
Rev Panam Salud Publica; 2007 Jul; 22(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 17931484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability and validity of the adapted Dutch version of the revised Scoliosis Research Society 22-item questionnaire.
Schlösser TP; Stadhouder A; Schimmel JJ; Lehr AM; van der Heijden GJ; Castelein RM
Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1663-72. PubMed ID: 24360746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Exploring the consistency of the SF-6D.
Ferreira LN; Ferreira PL; Pereira LN; Rowen D; Brazier JE
Value Health; 2013; 16(6):1023-31. PubMed ID: 24041352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The development of a model for translation of the Neck Disability Index to utility scores for cost-utility analysis in cervical disorders.
Richardson SS; Berven S
Spine J; 2012 Jan; 12(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 22209244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. What is the relationship between the minimally important difference and health state utility values? The case of the SF-6D.
Walters SJ; Brazier JE
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2003 Apr; 1():4. PubMed ID: 12737635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the EQ-5D and the SF-6D utility measures in 813 patients with early arthritis: results from the ESPOIR cohort.
Gaujoux-Viala C; Rat AC; Guillemin F; Flipo RM; Fardellone P; Bourgeois P; Fautrel B
J Rheumatol; 2011 Aug; 38(8):1576-84. PubMed ID: 21532054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of Reliability and Validity of SF-12v2 among a Diabetic Population.
Kathe N; Hayes CJ; Bhandari NR; Payakachat N
Value Health; 2018 Apr; 21(4):432-440. PubMed ID: 29680100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mapping the cancer-specific EORTC QLQ-C30 to the preference-based EQ-5D, SF-6D, and 15D instruments.
Kontodimopoulos N; Aletras VH; Paliouras D; Niakas D
Value Health; 2009; 12(8):1151-7. PubMed ID: 19558372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. What is the value of social values? The uselessness of assessing health-related quality of life through preference measures.
Prieto L; Sacristán JA
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2004 Apr; 4():10. PubMed ID: 15117417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
