211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29747864)
1. Cost-effectiveness analysis of biopsy strategies for endometrial cancer diagnosis in women with postmenopausal bleeding: Pipelle sampling curette versus dilatation & curettage.
Yi Y; Bryce CL; Adambekov S; Edwards RP; Goughnour SL; Linkov F
Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Jul; 150(1):112-118. PubMed ID: 29747864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison the Diagnostic Value of Dilatation and Curettage Versus Endometrial Biopsy by Pipelle--a Clinical Trial.
Sanam M; Majid MM
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(12):4971-5. PubMed ID: 26163624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pipelle versus fractional curettage for the endometrial sampling in postmenopausal women.
Bunyavejchevin S; Triratanachat S; Kankeow K; Limpaphayom KK
J Med Assoc Thai; 2001 Jun; 84 Suppl 1():S326-30. PubMed ID: 11529353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Outpatient endometrial sampling with the Pipelle curette.
Ben-Baruch G; Seidman DS; Schiff E; Moran O; Menczer J
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 1994; 37(4):260-2. PubMed ID: 8050731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Outpatient endometrial biopsy with Pipelle vs diagnostic dilatation and curettage.
Rauf R; Shaheen A; Sadia S; Waqar F; Zafar S; Sultana S; Waseem S
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2014; 26(2):145-8. PubMed ID: 25603664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The accuracy of endometrial sampling in women with postmenopausal bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
van Hanegem N; Prins MM; Bongers MY; Opmeer BC; Sahota DS; Mol BW; Timmermans A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Feb; 197():147-55. PubMed ID: 26748390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the Pipelle curette for endometrial biopsy.
Henig I; Chan P; Tredway DR; Maw GM; Gullett AJ; Cheatwood M
J Reprod Med; 1989 Oct; 34(10):786-9. PubMed ID: 2795561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Endopap-versus Pipelle-sampling in the diagnosis of postmenopausal endometrial disease.
Van den Bosch T; Vandendael A; Wranz PA; Lombard CJ
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1996 Jan; 64(1):91-4. PubMed ID: 8801158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Combination of vaginal ultrasonography and pipelle sampling in the diagnosis of endometrial disease.
Kavak Z; Ceyhan N; Pekin S
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1996 Feb; 36(1):63-6. PubMed ID: 8775255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pipelle endometrial sampling versus conventional dilatation & curettage in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding.
Abdelazim IA; Aboelezz A; Abdulkareem AF
J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc; 2013; 14(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 24592061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of endometrial sampling compared to conventional dilatation and curettage in women with abnormal uterine bleeding.
Abdelazim IA; Abdelrazak KM; Elbiaa AA; Al-Kadi M; Yehia AH
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 May; 291(5):1121-6. PubMed ID: 25367600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic Values of Pipelle and Standard Curettage Compared to Hysterectomy Pathology in Postmenopausal Bleeding: A Comparative Study.
Behnamfar F; Arshad E
Adv Biomed Res; 2020; 9():58. PubMed ID: 33457341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pipelle biopsy and dilatation and curettage in clinical practice: are factors affecting their effectiveness the same?
Piatek S; Warzecha D; Kisielewski F; Szymusik I; Panek G; Wielgos M
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2019 Mar; 45(3):645-651. PubMed ID: 30548369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the success of histopathological diagnosis with dilatation-curettage and Pipelle endometrial sampling.
Kazandi M; Okmen F; Ergenoglu AM; Yeniel AO; Zeybek B; Zekioglu O; Ozdemir N
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2012 Nov; 32(8):790-4. PubMed ID: 23075358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The safety and acceptability of Pipelle endometrial sampling in premenopausal women in comparison to postmenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding.
Rezk M; Dawood R; Masood A
Minerva Ginecol; 2016 Oct; 68(5):492-6. PubMed ID: 27430200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Effectiveness and Acceptability of Pipelle Endometrial Sampling versus Classical Dilatation and Curettage: A Three-Year Observational Study.
Rezk M; Sayyed T; Dawood R
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2016; 81(6):537-542. PubMed ID: 26928973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reliability of oupatient endometrial brush cytology vs biopsy in postmenopausal symptomatic women.
Mossa B; Ebano V; Marziani R
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2010; 31(6):621-6. PubMed ID: 21319503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-effectiveness of diagnostic strategies for the management of abnormal uterine bleeding (heavy menstrual bleeding and post-menopausal bleeding): a decision analysis.
Cooper NA; Barton PM; Breijer M; Caffrey O; Opmeer BC; Timmermans A; Mol BW; Khan KS; Clark TJ
Health Technol Assess; 2014 Apr; 18(24):1-201, v-vi. PubMed ID: 24767431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Current role of Pipelle endometrial sampling in early diagnosis of endometrial cancer.
Terzic MM; Aimagambetova G; Terzic S; Norton M; Bapayeva G; Garzon S
Transl Cancer Res; 2020 Dec; 9(12):7716-7724. PubMed ID: 35117374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validity of pipelle endometrial sampling in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding.
Fakhar S; Saeed G; Khan AH; Alam AY
Ann Saudi Med; 2008; 28(3):188-91. PubMed ID: 18500186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
