153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29748047)
21. Clinical implementation of synthesized mammography with digital breast tomosynthesis in a routine clinical practice.
Freer PE; Riegert J; Eisenmenger L; Ose D; Winkler N; Stein MA; Stoddard GJ; Hess R
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Nov; 166(2):501-509. PubMed ID: 28780702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Changes in recall type and patient treatment following implementation of screening digital breast tomosynthesis.
Lourenco AP; Barry-Brooks M; Baird GL; Tuttle A; Mainiero MB
Radiology; 2015 Feb; 274(2):337-42. PubMed ID: 25247407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Clinical performance metrics of 3D digital breast tomosynthesis compared with 2D digital mammography for breast cancer screening in community practice.
Greenberg JS; Javitt MC; Katzen J; Michael S; Holland AE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):687-93. PubMed ID: 24918774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Performance Metrics of Screening Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Based on Years Since a Prior Breast Cancer Diagnosis.
Do D; Mercaldo S; Bahl M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2024 Mar; 222(3):e2330419. PubMed ID: 38117100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Impact of the Addition of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) to Standard 2D Digital Screening Mammography on the Rates of Patient Recall, Cancer Detection, and Recommendations for Short-term Follow-up.
Powell JL; Hawley JR; Lipari AM; Yildiz VO; Erdal BS; Carkaci S
Acad Radiol; 2017 Mar; 24(3):302-307. PubMed ID: 27919540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Strategies for Decreasing Screening Mammography Recall Rates While Maintaining Performance Metrics.
Mullen LA; Panigrahi B; Hollada J; Panigrahi B; Falomo ET; Harvey SC
Acad Radiol; 2017 Dec; 24(12):1556-1560. PubMed ID: 28760363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Recall Rate Reduction with Tomosynthesis During Baseline Screening Examinations: An Assessment From a Prospective Trial.
Sumkin JH; Ganott MA; Chough DM; Catullo VJ; Zuley ML; Shinde DD; Hakim CM; Bandos AI; Gur D
Acad Radiol; 2015 Dec; 22(12):1477-82. PubMed ID: 26391857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Screening Mammography With and Without Computer-Aided Detection.
Lehman CD; Wellman RD; Buist DS; Kerlikowske K; Tosteson AN; Miglioretti DL;
JAMA Intern Med; 2015 Nov; 175(11):1828-37. PubMed ID: 26414882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Breast Cancer Screening Using Tomosynthesis or Mammography: A Meta-analysis of Cancer Detection and Recall.
Marinovich ML; Hunter KE; Macaskill P; Houssami N
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2018 Sep; 110(9):942-949. PubMed ID: 30107542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Disparities in Same-Day Diagnostic Imaging in Breast Cancer Screening: Impact of an Immediate-Read Screening Mammography Program Implemented During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Dontchos BN; Achibiri J; Mercaldo SF; Wang GX; Lamb LR; Miles RC; Narayan AK; Lehman CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Feb; 218(2):270-278. PubMed ID: 34494449
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Characteristics of screen-detected cancers following concordant or discordant recalls at blinded double reading in biennial digital screening mammography.
Coolen AMP; Lameijer JRC; Voogd AC; Louwman MWJ; Strobbe LJ; Tjan-Heijnen VCG; Duijm LEM
Eur Radiol; 2019 Jan; 29(1):337-344. PubMed ID: 29943181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Double reading of automated breast ultrasound with digital mammography or digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer screening.
Lee JM; Partridge SC; Liao GJ; Hippe DS; Kim AE; Lee CI; Rahbar H; Scheel JR; Lehman CD
Clin Imaging; 2019; 55():119-125. PubMed ID: 30807927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Implementation of Synthesized Two-dimensional Mammography in a Population-based Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Program.
Zuckerman SP; Conant EF; Keller BM; Maidment AD; Barufaldi B; Weinstein SP; Synnestvedt M; McDonald ES
Radiology; 2016 Dec; 281(3):730-736. PubMed ID: 27467468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program.
Skaane P; Bandos AI; Gullien R; Eben EB; Ekseth U; Haakenaasen U; Izadi M; Jebsen IN; Jahr G; Krager M; Niklason LT; Hofvind S; Gur D
Radiology; 2013 Apr; 267(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 23297332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effect of age on breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography.
Rafferty EA; Rose SL; Miller DP; Durand MA; Conant EF; Copit DS; Friedewald SM; Plecha DM; Ott IL; Hayes MK; Carlson KL; Cink TM; Barke LD; Greer LN; Niklason LT
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Aug; 164(3):659-666. PubMed ID: 28523569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Synthesized Mammography: The New Standard of Care When Screening for Breast Cancer with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis?
Ambinder EB; Harvey SC; Panigrahi B; Li X; Woods RW
Acad Radiol; 2018 Aug; 25(8):973-976. PubMed ID: 29395801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Compliance With Screening Mammography Guidelines After a False-Positive Mammogram.
Hardesty LA; Lind KE; Gutierrez EJ
J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Sep; 13(9):1032-8. PubMed ID: 27233908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. BI-RADS Category 3 Comparison: Probably Benign Category after Recall from Screening before and after Implementation of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
McDonald ES; McCarthy AM; Weinstein SP; Schnall MD; Conant EF
Radiology; 2017 Dec; 285(3):778-787. PubMed ID: 28715278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Addition of tomosynthesis to conventional digital mammography: effect on image interpretation time of screening examinations.
Dang PA; Freer PE; Humphrey KL; Halpern EF; Rafferty EA
Radiology; 2014 Jan; 270(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 24354377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
