These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29748199)

  • 21. Accuracy of whole-genome prediction using a genetic architecture-enhanced variance-covariance matrix.
    Zhang Z; Erbe M; He J; Ober U; Gao N; Zhang H; Simianer H; Li J
    G3 (Bethesda); 2015 Feb; 5(4):615-27. PubMed ID: 25670771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Model comparison on genomic predictions using high-density markers for different groups of bulls in the Nordic Holstein population.
    Gao H; Su G; Janss L; Zhang Y; Lund MS
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Jul; 96(7):4678-87. PubMed ID: 23660137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Genome-wide association analyses using a Bayesian approach for litter size and piglet mortality in Danish Landrace and Yorkshire pigs.
    Guo X; Su G; Christensen OF; Janss L; Lund MS
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Jun; 17():468. PubMed ID: 27317562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Genomic prediction of breeding values using previously estimated SNP variances.
    Calus MP; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Sep; 46(1):52. PubMed ID: 25928875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Genomic Prediction from Multiple-Trait Bayesian Regression Methods Using Mixture Priors.
    Cheng H; Kizilkaya K; Zeng J; Garrick D; Fernando R
    Genetics; 2018 May; 209(1):89-103. PubMed ID: 29514861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Accuracy of genomic selection for a sib-evaluated trait using identity-by-state and identity-by-descent relationships.
    Vela-Avitúa S; Meuwissen TH; Luan T; Ødegård J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):9. PubMed ID: 25888184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Improving accuracy of genomic prediction by genetic architecture based priors in a Bayesian model.
    Gao N; Li J; He J; Xiao G; Luo Y; Zhang H; Chen Z; Zhang Z
    BMC Genet; 2015 Oct; 16():120. PubMed ID: 26466667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Bayesian multiple quantitative trait loci mapping for complex traits using markers of the entire genome.
    Huang H; Eversley CD; Threadgill DW; Zou F
    Genetics; 2007 Aug; 176(4):2529-40. PubMed ID: 17483433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Genome-wide association study of swine farrowing traits. Part II: Bayesian analysis of marker data.
    Schneider JF; Rempel LA; Snelling WM; Wiedmann RT; Nonneman DJ; Rohrer GA
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Oct; 90(10):3360-7. PubMed ID: 22585800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. How powerful are summary-based methods for identifying expression-trait associations under different genetic architectures?
    Veturi Y; Ritchie MD
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 2018; 23():228-239. PubMed ID: 29218884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cross-Validation Without Doing Cross-Validation in Genome-Enabled Prediction.
    Gianola D; Schön CC
    G3 (Bethesda); 2016 Oct; 6(10):3107-3128. PubMed ID: 27489209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Application of a Bayesian dominance model improves power in quantitative trait genome-wide association analysis.
    Bennewitz J; Edel C; Fries R; Meuwissen TH; Wellmann R
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jan; 49(1):7. PubMed ID: 28088170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Association mapping in plants in the post-GWAS genomics era.
    Gupta PK; Kulwal PL; Jaiswal V
    Adv Genet; 2019; 104():75-154. PubMed ID: 31200809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Bayes factors for detection of quantitative trait loci.
    Varona L; García-Cortés LA; Pérez-Enciso M
    Genet Sel Evol; 2001; 33(2):133-52. PubMed ID: 11333831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Variable selection models for genomic selection using whole-genome sequence data and singular value decomposition.
    Meuwissen THE; Indahl UG; Ødegård J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Dec; 49(1):94. PubMed ID: 29281962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Modeling heterogeneous (co)variances from adjacent-SNP groups improves genomic prediction for milk protein composition traits.
    Gebreyesus G; Lund MS; Buitenhuis B; Bovenhuis H; Poulsen NA; Janss LG
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Dec; 49(1):89. PubMed ID: 29207947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Multibreed genomic prediction using multitrait genomic residual maximum likelihood and multitask Bayesian variable selection.
    Calus MPL; Goddard ME; Wientjes YCJ; Bowman PJ; Hayes BJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 May; 101(5):4279-4294. PubMed ID: 29550121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Fine tuning genomic evaluations in dairy cattle through SNP pre-selection with the Elastic-Net algorithm.
    Croiseau P; Legarra A; Guillaume F; Fritz S; Baur A; Colombani C; Robert-Granié C; Boichard D; Ducrocq V
    Genet Res (Camb); 2011 Dec; 93(6):409-17. PubMed ID: 22189606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of alternative approaches to single-trait genomic prediction using genotyped and non-genotyped Hanwoo beef cattle.
    Lee J; Cheng H; Garrick D; Golden B; Dekkers J; Park K; Lee D; Fernando R
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jan; 49(1):2. PubMed ID: 28093065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Frequentist p-values for large-scale-single step genome-wide association, with an application to birth weight in American Angus cattle.
    Aguilar I; Legarra A; Cardoso F; Masuda Y; Lourenco D; Misztal I
    Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Jun; 51(1):28. PubMed ID: 31221101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.