443 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29748233)
1. Prospective Study of Serial
Peterson LM; O'Sullivan J; Wu QV; Novakova-Jiresova A; Jenkins I; Lee JH; Shields A; Montgomery S; Linden HM; Gralow J; Gadi VK; Muzi M; Kinahan P; Mankoff D; Specht JM
J Nucl Med; 2018 Dec; 59(12):1823-1830. PubMed ID: 29748233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Serial 2-[18F] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) to monitor treatment of bone-dominant metastatic breast cancer predicts time to progression (TTP).
Specht JM; Tam SL; Kurland BF; Gralow JR; Livingston RB; Linden HM; Ellis GK; Schubert EK; Dunnwald LK; Mankoff DA
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Sep; 105(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 17268819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does Measurement of First-Order and Heterogeneity Parameters Improve Response Assessment of Bone Metastases in Breast Cancer Compared to SUV
Azad GK; Cousin F; Siddique M; Taylor B; Goh V; Cook GJR
Mol Imaging Biol; 2019 Aug; 21(4):781-789. PubMed ID: 30250989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5.
Makhlin I; Korhonen KE; Martin ML; Gillman J; Schubert E; Pantel AR; Mankoff DA; Clark AS
Radiol Imaging Cancer; 2022 Nov; 4(6):e220032. PubMed ID: 36269154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prospective Comparison of 99mTc-MDP Scintigraphy, Combined 18F-NaF and 18F-FDG PET/CT, and Whole-Body MRI in Patients with Breast and Prostate Cancer.
Minamimoto R; Loening A; Jamali M; Barkhodari A; Mosci C; Jackson T; Obara P; Taviani V; Gambhir SS; Vasanawala S; Iagaru A
J Nucl Med; 2015 Dec; 56(12):1862-8. PubMed ID: 26405167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Incremental Value of Cocktail 18F-FDG and 18F-NaF PET/CT Over 18F-FDG PET/CT Alone for Characterization of Skeletal Metastases in Breast Cancer.
Roop MJ; Singh B; Singh H; Watts A; Kohli PS; Mittal BR; Singh G
Clin Nucl Med; 2017 May; 42(5):335-340. PubMed ID: 28263210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 18F-FDG PET/CT is a prognostic biomarker in patients affected by bone metastases from breast cancer in comparison with 18F-NaF PET/CT.
Piccardo A; Puntoni M; Morbelli S; Massollo M; Bongioanni F; Paparo F; Altrinetti V; Gonella R; Gennari A; Iacozzi M; Sambuceti G; DeCensi A
Nuklearmedizin; 2015; 54(4):163-72. PubMed ID: 26165806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. 18F-FDG PET/CT findings and circulating tumor cell counts in the monitoring of systemic therapies for bone metastases from breast cancer.
De Giorgi U; Mego M; Rohren EM; Liu P; Handy BC; Reuben JM; Macapinlac HA; Hortobagyi GN; Cristofanilli M; Ueno NT
J Nucl Med; 2010 Aug; 51(8):1213-8. PubMed ID: 20660382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prediction of therapy response in bone-predominant metastatic breast cancer: comparison of [
Azad GK; Taylor BP; Green A; Sandri I; Swampillai A; Harries M; Kristeleit H; Mansi J; Goh V; Cook GJR
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2019 Apr; 46(4):821-830. PubMed ID: 30506455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prognostic value of quantitative fluorodeoxyglucose measurements in newly diagnosed metastatic breast cancer.
Ulaner GA; Eaton A; Morris PG; Lilienstein J; Jhaveri K; Patil S; Fazio M; Larson S; Hudis CA; Jochelson MS
Cancer Med; 2013 Oct; 2(5):725-33. PubMed ID: 24403238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The maximum standardized uptake value of metastatic site in 18 F-FDG PET/CT predicts molecular subtypes and survival in metastatic breast cancer: An Izmir Oncology Group study.
Cokmert S; Tanriverdi O; Karapolat I; Demir L; Bayoglu V; Can A; Akyol M; Yilmaz Y; Oktay Tarhan M
J BUON; 2016; 21(6):1410-1418. PubMed ID: 28039701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective evaluation of (99m)Tc MDP scintigraphy, (18)F NaF PET/CT, and (18)F FDG PET/CT for detection of skeletal metastases.
Iagaru A; Mittra E; Dick DW; Gambhir SS
Mol Imaging Biol; 2012 Apr; 14(2):252-9. PubMed ID: 21479710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospective comparison of early interim
Su TP; Huang JS; Chang PH; Lui KW; Hsieh JC; Ng SH; Chan SC
BMC Cancer; 2021 Aug; 21(1):908. PubMed ID: 34376155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. (18)F-fluoride PET imaging in a nude rat model of bone metastasis from breast cancer: Comparison with (18)F-FDG and bioluminescence imaging.
Kang WJ; Song EH; Park JY; Park YJ; Cho A; Song HT
Nucl Med Biol; 2015 Sep; 42(9):728-33. PubMed ID: 26068116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. F-18 fluoride uptake in primary breast cancer.
Sarikaya I; Sharma P; Sarikaya A
Ann Nucl Med; 2018 Dec; 32(10):678-686. PubMed ID: 30178199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The value of quantitative analysis in
Lapa P; Marques M; Costa G; Lima JP
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol; 2017; 36(2):78-84. PubMed ID: 27793635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prognostic Factors in Patients Treated with 223Ra: The Role of Skeletal Tumor Burden on Baseline 18F-Fluoride PET/CT in Predicting Overall Survival.
Etchebehere EC; Araujo JC; Fox PS; Swanston NM; Macapinlac HA; Rohren EM
J Nucl Med; 2015 Aug; 56(8):1177-84. PubMed ID: 26069307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. High prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET for metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a long-term evaluation.
Bahri H; Laurence L; Edeline J; Leghzali H; Devillers A; Raoul JL; Cuggia M; Mesbah H; Clement B; Boucher E; Garin E
J Nucl Med; 2014 Nov; 55(11):1786-90. PubMed ID: 25286923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Treatment response evaluation with
Sachpekidis C; Hillengass J; Goldschmidt H; Wagner B; Haberkorn U; Kopka K; Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Jan; 44(1):50-62. PubMed ID: 27573638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
