These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2974871)

  • 1. Lexical ambiguity and the timecourse of attentional allocation in word recognition.
    Kellas G; Ferraro FR; Simpson GB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1988 Nov; 14(4):601-9. PubMed ID: 2974871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attentional resource demands of visual word recognition in naming and lexical decisions.
    Herdman CM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1992 May; 18(2):460-70. PubMed ID: 1593230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attentional demands of visual word recognition.
    Herdman CM; Dobbs AR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1989 Feb; 15(1):124-32. PubMed ID: 2522522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Age and the allocation of attention across the time course of word recognition.
    Simpson GB; Kellas G; Ferraro FR
    J Gen Psychol; 1999 Apr; 126(2):119-33. PubMed ID: 10368939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Turning an advantage into a disadvantage: ambiguity effects in lexical decision versus reading tasks.
    Piercey CD; Joordens S
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Jun; 28(4):657-66. PubMed ID: 10946548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Allocation of attention during visual word recognition.
    Becker CA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1976 Nov; 2(4):556-66. PubMed ID: 1011005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage.
    Balota DA; Chumbley JI
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1984 Jun; 10(3):340-57. PubMed ID: 6242411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lexical ambiguity, semantic context, and visual word recognition.
    Schvaneveldt RW; Meyer DE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1976 May; 2(2):243-56. PubMed ID: 1271030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Semantic Ambiguity: Do Multiple Meanings Inhibit or Facilitate Word Recognition?
    Haro J; Ferré P
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2018 Jun; 47(3):679-698. PubMed ID: 29280032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Phonological ambiguity and lexical ambiguity: effects on visual and auditory word recognition.
    Frost R; Feldman LB; Katz L
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 Jul; 16(4):569-80. PubMed ID: 2142953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The frequency effect for pseudowords in the lexical decision task.
    Perea M; Rosa E; Gómez C
    Percept Psychophys; 2005 Feb; 67(2):301-14. PubMed ID: 15971693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recognition and lexical decision without detection: unconscious perception?
    Merikle PM; Reingold EM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 Aug; 16(3):574-83. PubMed ID: 2144572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lexical factors in conceptual processes: The relationship between semantic representations and their corresponding phonological and orthographic lexical forms.
    Peleg O; Edelist L; Eviatar Z; Bergerbest D
    Mem Cognit; 2016 May; 44(4):519-37. PubMed ID: 26637339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies.
    Kuperman V; Drieghe D; Keuleers E; Brysbaert M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):563-80. PubMed ID: 22524868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Emotionality effects in ambiguous word recognition: The crucial role of the affective congruence between distinct meanings of ambiguous words.
    Ferré P; Haro J; Huete-Pérez D; Fraga I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Jul; 74(7):1234-1243. PubMed ID: 33438523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reading in a deep orthography: neuromagnetic evidence for dual-mechanisms.
    Wilson TW; Leuthold AC; Moran JE; Pardo PJ; Lewis SM; Georgopoulos AP
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Jun; 180(2):247-62. PubMed ID: 17256164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. ERP characterization of sustained attention effects in visual lexical categorization.
    Martin CD; Thierry G; Démonet JF
    PLoS One; 2010 Mar; 5(3):e9892. PubMed ID: 20361039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A dissociative word-frequency X levels-of-processing interaction in episodic recognition and lexical decision tasks.
    Duchek JM; Neely JH
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Mar; 17(2):148-62. PubMed ID: 2927313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual word recognition and vowelization in Arabic: new evidence from lexical decision task performances.
    Taha H; Azaizah-Seh H
    Cogn Process; 2017 Nov; 18(4):521-527. PubMed ID: 28840361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The processing of lexical stress during visual word recognition: typicality effects and orthographic correlates.
    Arciuli J; Cupples L
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 May; 59(5):920-48. PubMed ID: 16608755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.