353 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29748869)
21. A method for the automated classification of benign and malignant masses on digital breast tomosynthesis images using machine learning and radiomic features.
Sakai A; Onishi Y; Matsui M; Adachi H; Teramoto A; Saito K; Fujita H
Radiol Phys Technol; 2020 Mar; 13(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 31686300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Incorporation of an iterative, linear segmentation routine into a mammographic mass CAD system.
Catarious DM; Baydush AH; Floyd CE
Med Phys; 2004 Jun; 31(6):1512-20. PubMed ID: 15259655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Breast cancer diagnosis from contrast-enhanced mammography using multi-feature fusion neural network.
Qian N; Jiang W; Guo Y; Zhu J; Qiu J; Yu H; Huang X
Eur Radiol; 2024 Feb; 34(2):917-927. PubMed ID: 37610440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Dual system approach to computer-aided detection of breast masses on mammograms.
Wei J; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Helvie MA; Roubidoux MA; Zhou C; Ge J
Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4157-68. PubMed ID: 17153394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A multi-stage fusion framework to classify breast lesions using deep learning and radiomics features computed from four-view mammograms.
Jones MA; Sadeghipour N; Chen X; Islam W; Zheng B
Med Phys; 2023 Dec; 50(12):7670-7683. PubMed ID: 37083190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Peri-lesion regions in differentiating suspicious breast calcification-only lesions specifically on contrast enhanced mammography.
Cao K; Gao F; Long R; Zhang FD; Huang CC; Cao M; Yu YZ; Sun YS
J Xray Sci Technol; 2024; 32(3):583-596. PubMed ID: 38306089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Anatomical noise in contrast-enhanced digital mammography. Part I. Single-energy imaging.
Hill ML; Mainprize JG; Carton AK; Muller S; Ebrahimi M; Jong RA; Dromain C; Yaffe MJ
Med Phys; 2013 May; 40(5):051910. PubMed ID: 23635280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Radiomics based detection and characterization of suspicious lesions on full field digital mammograms.
Sapate SG; Mahajan A; Talbar SN; Sable N; Desai S; Thakur M
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Sep; 163():1-20. PubMed ID: 30119844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Applying a new bilateral mammographic density segmentation method to improve accuracy of breast cancer risk prediction.
Yan S; Wang Y; Aghaei F; Qiu Y; Zheng B
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2017 Oct; 12(10):1819-1828. PubMed ID: 28726117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Developing a new case based computer-aided detection scheme and an adaptive cueing method to improve performance in detecting mammographic lesions.
Tan M; Aghaei F; Wang Y; Zheng B
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jan; 62(2):358-376. PubMed ID: 27997380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. False-positive reduction in computer-aided mass detection using mammographic texture analysis and classification.
Dhahbi S; Barhoumi W; Kurek J; Swiderski B; Kruk M; Zagrouba E
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Jul; 160():75-83. PubMed ID: 29728249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Computer-aided detection of breast masses on full field digital mammograms.
Wei J; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Chan HP; Petrick N; Helvie MA; Roubidoux MA; Ge J; Zhou C
Med Phys; 2005 Sep; 32(9):2827-38. PubMed ID: 16266097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Globally supported radial basis function based collocation method for evolution of level set in mass segmentation using mammograms.
Kashyap KL; Bajpai MK; Khanna P
Comput Biol Med; 2017 Aug; 87():22-37. PubMed ID: 28549292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Contrast enhanced dual energy spectral mammogram, an emerging addendum in breast imaging.
Kariyappa KD; Gnanaprakasam F; Anand S; Krishnaswami M; Ramachandran M
Br J Radiol; 2016 Nov; 89(1067):20150609. PubMed ID: 27610475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Multiview-based computer-aided detection scheme for breast masses.
Zheng B; Leader JK; Abrams GS; Lu AH; Wallace LP; Maitz GS; Gur D
Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3135-43. PubMed ID: 17022205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A novel computer aided breast mass detection scheme based on morphological enhancement and SLIC superpixel segmentation.
Chu J; Min H; Liu L; Lu W
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):3859-69. PubMed ID: 26133587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Development and Assessment of a New Global Mammographic Image Feature Analysis Scheme to Predict Likelihood of Malignant Cases.
Heidari M; Mirniaharikandehei S; Liu W; Hollingsworth AB; Liu H; Zheng B
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2020 Apr; 39(4):1235-1244. PubMed ID: 31603818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Detection of mass regions in mammograms by bilateral analysis adapted to breast density using similarity indexes and convolutional neural networks.
Bandeira Diniz JO; Bandeira Diniz PH; Azevedo Valente TL; Corrêa Silva A; de Paiva AC; Gattass M
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Mar; 156():191-207. PubMed ID: 29428071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Clinical evaluation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography and contrast enhanced tomosynthesis--Comparison to contrast-enhanced breast MRI.
Chou CP; Lewin JM; Chiang CL; Hung BH; Yang TL; Huang JS; Liao JB; Pan HB
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Dec; 84(12):2501-8. PubMed ID: 26456307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A new computer-aided detection approach based on analysis of local and global mammographic feature asymmetry.
Kelder A; Lederman D; Zheng B; Zigel Y
Med Phys; 2018 Apr; 45(4):1459-1470. PubMed ID: 29431858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
