These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29748972)

  • 1. Multiple testing with discrete data: Proportion of true null hypotheses and two adaptive FDR procedures.
    Chen X; Doerge RW; Heyse JF
    Biom J; 2018 Jul; 60(4):761-779. PubMed ID: 29748972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. False discovery rate control for multiple testing based on discrete p-values.
    Chen X
    Biom J; 2020 Jul; 62(4):1060-1079. PubMed ID: 31958180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimating the proportion of true null hypotheses and adaptive false discovery rate control in discrete paradigm.
    Biswas A; Chattopadhyay G
    Biom J; 2024 Mar; 66(2):e2200204. PubMed ID: 38356198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A weighted FDR procedure under discrete and heterogeneous null distributions.
    Chen X; Doerge RW; Sarkar SK
    Biom J; 2020 Oct; 62(6):1544-1563. PubMed ID: 32367597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bon-EV: an improved multiple testing procedure for controlling false discovery rates.
    Li D; Xie Z; Zand M; Fogg T; Dye T
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Jan; 18(1):1. PubMed ID: 28049414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Minimally adaptive BH: A tiny but uniform improvement of the procedure of Benjamini and Hochberg.
    Solari A; Goeman JJ
    Biom J; 2017 Jul; 59(4):776-780. PubMed ID: 27192178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Resampling-based empirical Bayes multiple testing procedures for controlling generalized tail probability and expected value error rates: focus on the false discovery rate and simulation study.
    Dudoit S; Gilbert HN; van der Laan MJ
    Biom J; 2008 Oct; 50(5):716-44. PubMed ID: 18932138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimation of the proportion of true null hypotheses under sparse dependence: Adaptive FDR controlling in microarray data.
    Biswas A; Chakraborty S; Baruah VJ
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2022 May; 31(5):917-927. PubMed ID: 35133933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. False discovery rate estimation for large-scale homogeneous discrete p-values.
    Liang K
    Biometrics; 2016 Jun; 72(2):639-48. PubMed ID: 26492596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of dependence in high-dimensional multiple testing problems.
    Kim KI; van de Wiel MA
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Feb; 9():114. PubMed ID: 18298808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the operational characteristics of the Benjamini and Hochberg False Discovery Rate procedure.
    Green GH; Diggle PJ
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2007; 6():Article27. PubMed ID: 18052910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of methods for estimating the number of true null hypotheses in multiplicity testing.
    Hsueh HM; Chen JJ; Kodell RL
    J Biopharm Stat; 2003 Nov; 13(4):675-89. PubMed ID: 14584715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Wavelet thresholding with bayesian false discovery rate control.
    Tadesse MG; Ibrahim JG; Vannucci M; Gentleman R
    Biometrics; 2005 Mar; 61(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 15737075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A direct approach to estimating false discovery rates conditional on covariates.
    Boca SM; Leek JT
    PeerJ; 2018; 6():e6035. PubMed ID: 30581661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. POWER-ENHANCED MULTIPLE DECISION FUNCTIONS CONTROLLING FAMILY-WISE ERROR AND FALSE DISCOVERY RATES.
    Peña EA; Habiger JD; Wu W
    Ann Stat; 2011 Feb; 39(1):556-583. PubMed ID: 25018568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Control procedures and estimators of the false discovery rate and their application in low-dimensional settings: an empirical investigation.
    Brinster R; Köttgen A; Tayo BO; Schumacher M; Sekula P;
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Mar; 19(1):78. PubMed ID: 29499647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A new estimation of protein-level false discovery rate.
    Wu G; Wan X; Xu B
    BMC Genomics; 2018 Aug; 19(Suppl 6):567. PubMed ID: 30367581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Re-sampling strategy to improve the estimation of number of null hypotheses in FDR control under strong correlation structures.
    Lu X; Perkins DL
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 May; 8():157. PubMed ID: 17509157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bias-corrected estimators for proportion of true null hypotheses: application of adaptive FDR-controlling in segmented failure data.
    Biswas A; Chattopadhyay G; Chatterjee A
    J Appl Stat; 2022; 49(14):3591-3613. PubMed ID: 36246854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Paradoxical results of adaptive false discovery rate procedures in neuroimaging studies.
    Reiss PT; Schwartzman A; Lu F; Huang L; Proal E
    Neuroimage; 2012 Dec; 63(4):1833-40. PubMed ID: 22842214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.