These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29749024)

  • 1. Determining the effects of adulterants on drug detection via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and adulterant tests strips.
    Olivieri B; Marić M; Bridge C
    Drug Test Anal; 2018 Sep; 10(9):1383-1393. PubMed ID: 29749024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adulterants in Urine Drug Testing.
    Fu S
    Adv Clin Chem; 2016; 76():123-63. PubMed ID: 27645818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. False-negative results in the immunoassay analysis of drugs of abuse: can adulterants be detected by sample check test?
    Matriciani B; Huppertz B; Keller R; Weiskirchen R
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2018 May; 55(3):348-354. PubMed ID: 28728424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of urine adulterants on commercial drug abuse screening test strip results.
    Rajšić I; Javorac D; Tatović S; Repić A; Đukić-Ćosić D; Đorđević S; Lukić V; Bulat Z
    Arh Hig Rada Toksikol; 2020 Mar; 71(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 32597134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance evaluation of three on-site adulterant detection devices for urine specimens.
    Peace MR; Tarnai LD
    J Anal Toxicol; 2002 Oct; 26(7):464-70. PubMed ID: 12423001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Zinc reduces the detection of cocaine, methamphetamine, and THC by ELISA urine testing.
    Venkatratnam A; Lents NH
    J Anal Toxicol; 2011 Jul; 35(6):333-40. PubMed ID: 21740689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of adulterants on urine screen for drugs of abuse: detection by an on-site dipstick device.
    Wong R
    Am Clin Lab; 2002; 21(1):37-9. PubMed ID: 11975450
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of spot tests with AdultaCheck 6 and Intect 7 urine test strips for detecting the presence of adulterants in urine specimens.
    Dasgupta A; Chughtai O; Hannah C; Davis B; Wells A
    Clin Chim Acta; 2004 Oct; 348(1-2):19-25. PubMed ID: 15369731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adulterants causing false negatives in illicit drug testing.
    Mikkelsen SL; Ash KO
    Clin Chem; 1988 Nov; 34(11):2333-6. PubMed ID: 3052928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Urine drug-testing tampering approaches: Turkish probationers.
    Aydoğdu M; Akgür SA
    Med Sci Law; 2021 Jan; 61(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 32924786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimization of cloned enzyme donor immunoassay cut-offs for drugs of abuse in whole blood of drivers involved in road accidents.
    Pelletti G; Garagnani M; Rossi F; Roffi R; Barone R; Pelotti S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Jan; 294():27-33. PubMed ID: 30447484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of adulterants and selected ingested compounds on drugs-of-abuse testing in urine.
    Dasgupta A
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2007 Sep; 128(3):491-503. PubMed ID: 17709324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A field evaluation of five on-site drug-testing devices.
    Crouch DJ; Hersch RK; Cook RF; Frank JF; Walsh JM
    J Anal Toxicol; 2002 Oct; 26(7):493-9. PubMed ID: 12423006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adulteration of urine by "Urine Luck".
    Wu AH; Bristol B; Sexton K; Cassella-McLane G; Holtman V; Hill DW
    Clin Chem; 1999 Jul; 45(7):1051-7. PubMed ID: 10388482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of endogenous urinary biomarkers for indirect detection of urine adulteration attempts by five different chemical adulterants in mass spectrometry methods.
    Steuer AE; Kamber D; Kraemer T
    Drug Test Anal; 2019 May; 11(5):638-648. PubMed ID: 30408836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detectability of phencyclidine and 11-nor-delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol-9-carboxylic acid in adulterated urine by radioimmunoassay and fluorescence polarization immunoassay.
    Bronner W; Nyman P; von Minden D
    J Anal Toxicol; 1990; 14(6):368-71. PubMed ID: 1964989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of oxidizing adulterants on detection of 11-nor-delta9-THC-9-carboxylic acid in urine.
    Paul BD; Jacobs A
    J Anal Toxicol; 2002 Oct; 26(7):460-3. PubMed ID: 12423000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of adulterating agents on FPIA analysis of urine for drugs of abuse.
    Schwarzhoff R; Cody JT
    J Anal Toxicol; 1993; 17(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 8429620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the TRI 'dipstick' test for the detection of drugs of abuse in urine.
    Jukofsky D; Kramer A; Mulé SJ
    J Anal Toxicol; 1981; 5(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 6783782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the integrated E-Z split key(®) cup II for rapid detection of twelve drug classes in urine.
    Greene DN; Lehman CM; McMillin GA
    J Anal Toxicol; 2011 Jan; 35(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 21219703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.