839 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29749178)
1. [Greenhouse gas emissions, carbon leakage and net carbon sequestration from afforestation and forest management: A review.].
Liu BJ; Lu F; Wang XK; Liu WW
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2017 Feb; 28(2):673-688. PubMed ID: 29749178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Greenhouse gas emissions and net carbon sequestration of "Grain for Green" Program in China.].
Liu BJ; Zhang L; Lu F; Wang XK; Liu WW; Zheng H; Meng L; OuYang ZY
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2016 Jun; 27(6):1693-1707. PubMed ID: 29737675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Afforestation: Replacing livestock emissions with carbon sequestration.
Duffy C; O'Donoghue C; Ryan M; Styles D; Spillane C
J Environ Manage; 2020 Jun; 264():110523. PubMed ID: 32250923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Effects of Mushroom Residue Application Rates on Net Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Purple Paddy Soil].
Qi L; Gao M; Zhou P; Wang FH; Gao YQ; Chen SQ; Wu SQ; Deng JL; Wen T
Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2018 Jun; 39(6):2827-2836. PubMed ID: 29965641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Chinese cropping systems are a net source of greenhouse gases despite soil carbon sequestration.
Gao B; Huang T; Ju X; Gu B; Huang W; Xu L; Rees RM; Powlson DS; Smith P; Cui S
Glob Chang Biol; 2018 Dec; 24(12):5590-5606. PubMed ID: 30118572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Designing a carbon market that protects forests in developing countries.
Niesten E; Frumhoff PC; Manion M; Hardner JJ
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2002 Aug; 360(1797):1875-88. PubMed ID: 12460503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantification and mapping of the supply of and demand for carbon storage and sequestration service in woody biomass and soil to mitigate climate change in the socio-ecological environment.
Sahle M; Saito O; Fürst C; Yeshitela K
Sci Total Environ; 2018 May; 624():342-354. PubMed ID: 29258035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Forest and grassland cover types reduce net greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural soils.
Baah-Acheamfour M; Carlyle CN; Lim SS; Bork EW; Chang SX
Sci Total Environ; 2016 Nov; 571():1115-27. PubMed ID: 27450260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A synthesis of current knowledge on forests and carbon storage in the United States.
McKinley DC; Ryan MG; Birdsey RA; Giardina CP; Harmon ME; Heath LS; Houghton RA; Jackson RB; Morrison JF; Murray BC; Patakl DE; Skog KE
Ecol Appl; 2011 Sep; 21(6):1902-24. PubMed ID: 21939033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analyzing the effects of various forest management strategies and carbon prices on carbon dynamics in western Turkey.
Kucuker DM
J Environ Manage; 2019 Nov; 249():109356. PubMed ID: 31445370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reducing climate impacts of beef production: A synthesis of life cycle assessments across management systems and global regions.
Cusack DF; Kazanski CE; Hedgpeth A; Chow K; Cordeiro AL; Karpman J; Ryals R
Glob Chang Biol; 2021 May; 27(9):1721-1736. PubMed ID: 33657680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Climate change mitigation for agriculture: water quality benefits and costs.
Wilcock R; Elliott S; Hudson N; Parkyn S; Quinn J
Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(11):2093-9. PubMed ID: 19092184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Boreal forests can have a remarkable role in reducing greenhouse gas emissions locally: Land use-related and anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions and sinks at the municipal level.
Vanhala P; Bergström I; Haaspuro T; Kortelainen P; Holmberg M; Forsius M
Sci Total Environ; 2016 Jul; 557-558():51-7. PubMed ID: 26994793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Greenhouse gas emissions and carbon sequestration by agroforestry systems in southeastern Brazil.
Torres CMME; Jacovine LAG; Nolasco de Olivera Neto S; Fraisse CW; Soares CPB; de Castro Neto F; Ferreira LR; Zanuncio JC; Lemes PG
Sci Rep; 2017 Dec; 7(1):16738. PubMed ID: 29196680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Greenhouse Gas Emissions for Typical Open-Field Vegetable Production in China].
Zhang F; Cheng TH; Chen XP; Wang XZ
Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2020 Jul; 41(7):3410-3417. PubMed ID: 32608915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimating the full greenhouse gas emissions offset potential and profile between rehabilitating and established mangroves.
Cameron C; Hutley LB; Friess DA
Sci Total Environ; 2019 May; 665():419-431. PubMed ID: 30772573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Net mitigation potential of straw return to Chinese cropland: estimation with a full greenhouse gas budget model.
Lu F; Wang X; Han B; Ouyang Z; Duan X; Zheng H
Ecol Appl; 2010 Apr; 20(3):634-47. PubMed ID: 20437953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Potential greenhouse gas reductions from Natural Climate Solutions in Oregon, USA.
Graves RA; Haugo RD; Holz A; Nielsen-Pincus M; Jones A; Kellogg B; Macdonald C; Popper K; Schindel M
PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0230424. PubMed ID: 32275725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. From sink to source: Regional variation in U.S. forest carbon futures.
Wear DN; Coulston JW
Sci Rep; 2015 Nov; 5():16518. PubMed ID: 26558439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Are secondary forests second-rate? Comparing peatland greenhouse gas emissions, chemical and microbial community properties between primary and secondary forests in Peninsular Malaysia.
Dhandapani S; Ritz K; Evers S; Yule CM; Sjögersten S
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Mar; 655():220-231. PubMed ID: 30471590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]