These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29749838)

  • 41. Dynamic online peer evaluations to improve group assignments in nursing e-learning environment.
    Adwan J
    Nurse Educ Today; 2016 Jun; 41():67-72. PubMed ID: 27138485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Impact of peer teaching on nursing students: perceptions of learning environment, self-efficacy, and knowledge.
    Brannagan KB; Dellinger A; Thomas J; Mitchell D; Lewis-Trabeaux S; Dupre S
    Nurse Educ Today; 2013 Nov; 33(11):1440-7. PubMed ID: 23260616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Implementation of the peer-led team-learning instructional model as a stopgap measure improves student achievement for students opting out of laboratory.
    Snyder JJ; Carter BE; Wiles JR
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2015 Mar; 14(1):ar2. PubMed ID: 25673354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Assessment of the effectiveness of the studio format in introductory undergraduate biology.
    Montelone BA; Rintoul DA; Williams LG
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2008; 7(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 18519615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Assessment of a novel group-centered testing schema in an upper-level undergraduate molecular biotechnology course.
    Srougi MC; Miller HB; Witherow DS; Carson S
    Biochem Mol Biol Educ; 2013; 41(4):232-41. PubMed ID: 23868378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Increased course structure improves performance in introductory biology.
    Freeman S; Haak D; Wenderoth MP
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2011; 10(2):175-86. PubMed ID: 21633066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Investigations of protein structure and function using the scientific literature: an assignment for an undergraduate cell physiology course.
    Mulnix AB
    Cell Biol Educ; 2003; 2(4):248-55. PubMed ID: 14673490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Formative student-authored question bank: perceptions, question quality and association with summative performance.
    Walsh JL; Harris BHL; Denny P; Smith P
    Postgrad Med J; 2018 Feb; 94(1108):97-103. PubMed ID: 28866607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. How accurate is peer grading?
    Freeman S; Parks JW
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2010; 9(4):482-8. PubMed ID: 21123695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Training peer instructors for a combined ultrasound/physical exam curriculum.
    Ahn JS; French AJ; Thiessen ME; Kendall JL
    Teach Learn Med; 2014; 26(3):292-5. PubMed ID: 25010242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Effects of students' peer teaching in a new pharmacokinetics teaching format.
    Legeay S; Repussart H; Oudini AS; Laurier C; Eveillard M
    Ann Pharm Fr; 2023 Mar; 81(2):248-257. PubMed ID: 36220463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Midwifery students' evaluation of team-based academic assignments involving peer-marking.
    Parratt JA; Fahy KM; Hastie CR
    Women Birth; 2014 Mar; 27(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 24200860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Participation in Voluntary Re-quizzing Is Predictive of Increased Performance on Cumulative Assessments in Introductory Biology.
    Walck-Shannon EM; Cahill MJ; McDaniel MA; Frey RF
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2019 Jun; 18(2):ar15. PubMed ID: 31025914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Collaborative group work: effects of group size and assignment structure on learning gain, student satisfaction and perceived participation.
    Kooloos JG; Klaassen T; Vereijken M; Van Kuppeveld S; Bolhuis S; Vorstenbosch M
    Med Teach; 2011; 33(12):983-8. PubMed ID: 22225436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Using the web to encourage student-generated questions in large-format introductory biology classes.
    Colbert JT; Olson JK; Clough MP
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2007; 6(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 17339393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The "Near-Peer" Approach to Teaching Musculoskeletal Physical Examination Skills Benefits Residents and Medical Students.
    Rosenberg CJ; Nanos KN; Newcomer KL
    PM R; 2017 Mar; 9(3):251-257. PubMed ID: 27292435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Medical faculty opinions of peer tutoring.
    Rudland JR; Rennie SC
    Educ Health (Abingdon); 2014; 27(1):4-9. PubMed ID: 24934936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The effect of flipped teaching combined with modified team-based learning on student performance in physiology.
    Gopalan C; Klann MC
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2017 Sep; 41(3):363-367. PubMed ID: 28679573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. From biology to mathematical models and back: teaching modeling to biology students, and biology to math and engineering students.
    Chiel HJ; McManus JM; Shaw KM
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2010; 9(3):248-65. PubMed ID: 20810957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Cues Matter: Learning Assistants Influence Introductory Biology Student Interactions during Clicker-Question Discussions.
    Knight JK; Wise SB; Rentsch J; Furtak EM
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2015; 14(4):ar41. PubMed ID: 26590204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.