91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29749857)
1. Participants' decision to enroll in cohort studies with biobanks: quantitative insights from two German studies.
Nobile H; Borry P; Pischon T; Steinbrecher A; Boeing H; Vigl M; Bergmann MM
Per Med; 2017 Nov; 14(6):477-485. PubMed ID: 29749857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Understanding motivations to participate in an observational research study: Why do patients enroll?
Soule MC; Beale EE; Suarez L; Beach SR; Mastromauro CA; Celano CM; Moore SV; Huffman JC
Soc Work Health Care; 2016; 55(3):231-46. PubMed ID: 26933943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Participants' Accounts on Their Decision to Join a Cohort Study With an Attached Biobank: A Qualitative Content Analysis Study Within Two German Studies.
Nobile H; Bergmann MM; Moldenhauer J; Borry P
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2016 Jul; 11(3):237-49. PubMed ID: 27381010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Enrolling in Clinical Research While Incarcerated: What Influences Participants' Decisions?
Christopher PP; Garcia-Sampson LG; Stein M; Johnson J; Rich J; Lidz C
Hastings Cent Rep; 2017 Mar; 47(2):21-29. PubMed ID: 28301701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The privacy-reciprocity connection in biobanking: comparing German with UK strategies.
Hobbs A; Starkbaum J; Gottweis U; Wichmann HE; Gottweis H
Public Health Genomics; 2012; 15(5):272-84. PubMed ID: 22722691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patients or research subjects? A qualitative study of participation in a randomised controlled trial of a complex intervention.
Heaven B; Murtagh M; Rapley T; May C; Graham R; Kaner E; Thomson R
Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Aug; 62(2):260-70. PubMed ID: 16181766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Motivations for participating in a non-interventional gender-based violence survey in a low-income setting in South Africa.
Sikweyiya Y; Nduna M; Shai N; Jewkes R
BMC Public Health; 2017 Jun; 17(1):605. PubMed ID: 28662653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Characteristics of Australian cohort study participants who do and do not take up an additional invitation to join a long-term biobank: The 45 and Up Study.
Banks E; Herbert N; Mather T; Rogers K; Jorm L
BMC Res Notes; 2012 Nov; 5():655. PubMed ID: 23181586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The impact of distance and duration of travel on participation rates and participants' satisfaction: results from a pilot study at one study centre in Pretest 2 of the German National Cohort.
Schweitzer A; Akmatov MK; Kindler F; Kemmling Y; Kreienbrock L; Krause G; Pessler F
BMJ Open; 2015 Aug; 5(8):e007461. PubMed ID: 26297358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Altruism among participants in cancer clinical trials.
Truong TH; Weeks JC; Cook EF; Joffe S
Clin Trials; 2011 Oct; 8(5):616-23. PubMed ID: 21813584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Understanding the decisions of cancer clinical trial participants to enter research studies: factors associated with informed consent, patient satisfaction, and decisional regret.
Stryker JE; Wray RJ; Emmons KM; Winer E; Demetri G
Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Oct; 63(1-2):104-9. PubMed ID: 16242898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Biobanks and the return of results to donors].
Vermeulen E; Boeckhout M; Zielhuis GA; Bakker R; Janssens AC; Schmidt MK
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2014; 158(5):A6653. PubMed ID: 24472337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Altruism and participation in longitudinal health research? Insights from the Whitehall II Study.
Mein G; Seale C; Rice H; Johal S; Ashcroft RE; Ellison G; Tinker A
Soc Sci Med; 2012 Dec; 75(12):2345-52. PubMed ID: 23031604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An investigation of patients' motivations for their participation in genetics-related research.
Hallowell N; Cooke S; Crawford G; Lucassen A; Parker M; Snowdon C
J Med Ethics; 2010 Jan; 36(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 20026692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Why do participants enroll in population biobank studies? A systematic literature review.
Nobile H; Vermeulen E; Thys K; Bergmann MM; Borry P
Expert Rev Mol Diagn; 2013 Jan; 13(1):35-47. PubMed ID: 23256702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Public perceptions of cohort studies and biobanks in Germany.
Starkbaum J; Gottweis H; Gottweis U; Kleiser C; Linseisen J; Meisinger C; Kamtsiuris P; Moebus S; Jöckel KH; Börm S; Wichmann HE
Biopreserv Biobank; 2014 Apr; 12(2):121-30. PubMed ID: 24749879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Motives of contributing personal data for health research: (non-)participation in a Dutch biobank.
Broekstra R; Maeckelberghe ELM; Aris-Meijer JL; Stolk RP; Otten S
BMC Med Ethics; 2020 Jul; 21(1):62. PubMed ID: 32711531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of veteran and nonveteran motivations and reasons for participating in clinical trials.
Campbell HM; Raisch DW; Sather MR; Warren SR; Segal AR
Mil Med; 2007 Jan; 172(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 17274261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Patients or volunteers? The impact of motivation for trial participation on the efficacy of patient decision Aids: a secondary analysis of a Cochrane systematic review.
Brown JG; Joyce KE; Stacey D; Thomson RG
Med Decis Making; 2015 May; 35(4):419-35. PubMed ID: 25943578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Study of the media's potential influence on prospective research participants' understanding of and motivations for participation in a high-profile phase I trial.
Pentz RD; Flamm AL; Sugarman J; Cohen MZ; Daniel Ayers G; Herbst RS; Abbruzzese JL
J Clin Oncol; 2002 Sep; 20(18):3785-91. PubMed ID: 12228198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
