These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29750361)

  • 1. Effects of reward context on feedback processing as indexed by time-frequency analysis.
    Watts ATM; Bernat EM
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Sep; 55(9):e13195. PubMed ID: 29750361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Time-frequency theta and delta measures index separable components of feedback processing in a gambling task.
    Bernat EM; Nelson LD; Baskin-Sommers AR
    Psychophysiology; 2015 May; 52(5):626-37. PubMed ID: 25581491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Expectancy effects in feedback processing are explained primarily by time-frequency delta not theta.
    Watts ATM; Bachman MD; Bernat EM
    Biol Psychol; 2017 Oct; 129():242-252. PubMed ID: 28865935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The electrocortical response to rewarding and aversive feedback: The reward positivity does not reflect salience in simple gambling tasks.
    Mulligan EM; Hajcak G
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Oct; 132(Pt B):262-267. PubMed ID: 29183793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Feedback-related negativity reflects omission of monetary gains: Evidence from ERP gambling study.
    Yaple Z; Shestakova A; Klucharev V
    Neurosci Lett; 2018 Nov; 686():145-149. PubMed ID: 30195974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Utilizing time-frequency amplitude and phase synchrony measure to assess feedback processing in a gambling task.
    Watts ATM; Tootell AV; Fix ST; Aviyente S; Bernat EM
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Oct; 132(Pt B):203-212. PubMed ID: 29719202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Manipulation of feedback expectancy and valence induces negative and positive reward prediction error signals manifest in event-related brain potentials.
    Pfabigan DM; Alexopoulos J; Bauer H; Sailer U
    Psychophysiology; 2011 May; 48(5):656-64. PubMed ID: 21039585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dissociating absolute and relative reward- and punishment-related electrocortical processing: An event-related potential study.
    Wischnewski M; Schutter DJLG
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Apr; 126():13-19. PubMed ID: 29481828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The ERP, frequency, and time-frequency correlates of feedback processing: Insights from a large sample study.
    Williams CC; Ferguson TD; Hassall CD; Abimbola W; Krigolson OE
    Psychophysiology; 2021 Feb; 58(2):e13722. PubMed ID: 33169842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Anterior cingulate activity to monetary loss and basal ganglia activity to monetary gain uniquely contribute to the feedback negativity.
    Foti D; Weinberg A; Bernat EM; Proudfit GH
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2015 Jul; 126(7):1338-47. PubMed ID: 25454338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Feedback information and the reward positivity.
    Cockburn J; Holroyd CB
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Oct; 132(Pt B):243-251. PubMed ID: 29208491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. It is less than you expected: the feedback-related negativity reflects violations of reward magnitude expectations.
    Bellebaum C; Polezzi D; Daum I
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Sep; 48(11):3343-50. PubMed ID: 20655319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of the magnitude, probability, and valence of potential wins and losses on the amplitude of the feedback negativity.
    Kreussel L; Hewig J; Kretschmer N; Hecht H; Coles MG; Miltner WH
    Psychophysiology; 2012 Feb; 49(2):207-19. PubMed ID: 22091824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transient and sustained ERP activity related to feedback processing in the probabilistic selection task.
    West R; Bailey K; Anderson S
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Apr; 126():1-12. PubMed ID: 29499240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Beyond the FRN: Broadening the time-course of EEG and ERP components implicated in reward processing.
    Glazer JE; Kelley NJ; Pornpattananangkul N; Mittal VA; Nusslock R
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Oct; 132(Pt B):184-202. PubMed ID: 29454641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. EEG correlates of physical effort and reward processing during reinforcement learning.
    Palidis DJ; Gribble PL
    J Neurophysiol; 2020 Aug; 124(2):610-622. PubMed ID: 32727262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Psychometric properties of neural responses to monetary and social rewards across development.
    Ethridge P; Weinberg A
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Oct; 132(Pt B):311-322. PubMed ID: 29402529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceptual properties of feedback stimuli influence the feedback-related negativity in the flanker gambling task.
    Liu Y; Nelson LD; Bernat EM; Gehring WJ
    Psychophysiology; 2014 Aug; 51(8):782-8. PubMed ID: 24673119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The feedback negativity reflects favorable compared to nonfavorable outcomes based on global, not local, alternatives.
    Kujawa A; Smith E; Luhmann C; Hajcak G
    Psychophysiology; 2013 Feb; 50(2):134-8. PubMed ID: 23241216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relevance and uncertainty jointly influence reward anticipation at the level of the SPN ERP component.
    Walentowska W; Paul K; Severo MC; Moors A; Pourtois G
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Oct; 132(Pt B):287-297. PubMed ID: 29129655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.