These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2975115)

  • 1. [Composite and amalgam fillings in a 4-year clinical comparison].
    Hoyer I; Gängler P; Niemela S
    Zahn Mund Kieferheilkd Zentralbl; 1988; 76(7):721-6. PubMed ID: 2975115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preventive resin restorations vs. amalgam restorations: a three-year clinical study.
    Cloyd S; Gilpatrick RO; Moore D
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1997 Oct; 77(4):36-40. PubMed ID: 9520761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer) in Class II restorations of primary teeth: a two-year follow-up study.
    Papagiannoulis L; Kakaboura A; Pantaleon F; Kavvadia K
    Pediatr Dent; 1999; 21(4):231-4. PubMed ID: 10436476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Clinical evaluation of composite restorations on the posterior teeth after 4 years].
    Prati C; Montanari G
    Minerva Stomatol; 1987 Oct; 36(10):765-9. PubMed ID: 3480412
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Clinical evaluation of the quality of amalgam and polymer filling materials after various periods of function. A study of servicemen of the German armed forces].
    Pieper K; Mausberg R; Curdt R; Uhde V
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1989 Sep; 44(9):707-10. PubMed ID: 2637851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Two-year clinical evaluation of preventive resin restorations.
    Moore DS; Gilpatrick RO; Cloyd JS
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1994 Apr; 74(2):27-30. PubMed ID: 9520767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The enigma of dental amalgam.
    Leinfelder K
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2004; 16(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 15259537
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Clinical follow-up studies of composite (Evicrol) fillings].
    Nyárasdy I; Herczegh B; Bánóczy J
    Zahn Mund Kieferheilkd Zentralbl; 1984; 72(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 6236646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Clinical study of amalgam fillings with different lifetimes].
    Nowak M; Ketterl W; Geurtsen W
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1984 Sep; 39(9):732-5. PubMed ID: 6593213
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors influencing dentists' choice of amalgam and tooth-colored restorative materials for Class II preparations in younger patients.
    Vidnes-Kopperud S; Tveit AB; Gaarden T; Sandvik L; Espelid I
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2009; 67(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 19085213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three-year clinical study of two composite resins and one non-gamma 2 conventional amalgam in posterior teeth.
    Prati C; Montanari G
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1988; 98(2):120-5. PubMed ID: 3162608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The surface texture of trimmed composite fillings. A scanning electron microscopy study.
    Gray HS; Gavin JB
    N Z Dent J; 1975 Jul; 71(325):139-45. PubMed ID: 1059036
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An alternative restoration method.
    Jackson GL
    Dent Surv; 1978 Sep; 54(9):24-7. PubMed ID: 288706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Amalgam can cause adverse effects in many people. No].
    Roeloffs W
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2011 Feb; 118(2):67. PubMed ID: 21438356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Mixed amalgam-composite restorations].
    Dallari A; Rovatti L
    Attual Dent; 1987 Apr; 3(14):10-1, 13-9. PubMed ID: 3477241
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical evaluation of composite resin and amalgam posterior restorations: three year results.
    Derkson GD; Richardson AS; Waldman R
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1984 Jun; 50(6):478-80. PubMed ID: 6378338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The clinical evaluation of glass ionomer cements and microfilled composite resins in the treatment of cervical lesions of the teeth (confirmed with scanning electron microscopy).
    Shahani DR; Kolwalkar NS
    J Indian Dent Assoc; 1986 Jan; 58(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 3457864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Clinical experience with a 5-year use of Evicrol fillings].
    Niemela S; Nyárasdy I; Hoyer I; Bánóczy J; Gangler P
    Fogorv Sz; 1987 Feb; 80(2):35-9. PubMed ID: 3549371
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Composite or amalgam? Not a black or white decision].
    Roeters FJ; Opdam NJ; Burgersdijk RC
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1992 Oct; 99(10):371-4. PubMed ID: 11820006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Approximal surfaces of class II amalgam fillings].
    Keszthelyi G
    Fogorv Sz; 1985 Mar; 78(3):83-9. PubMed ID: 3857198
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.