These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29753349)

  • 1. Can Severity Outweigh Smaller Numbers? A Deliberative Perspective from Canada.
    Magalhaes M
    Value Health; 2018 May; 21(5):532-537. PubMed ID: 29753349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The use of citizens' juries in health policy decision-making: a systematic review.
    Street J; Duszynski K; Krawczyk S; Braunack-Mayer A
    Soc Sci Med; 2014 May; 109():1-9. PubMed ID: 24657639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do consumer voices in health-care citizens' juries matter?
    Krinks R; Kendall E; Whitty JA; Scuffham PA
    Health Expect; 2016 Oct; 19(5):1015-22. PubMed ID: 26414486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of information and deliberation on the consistency of preferences for prioritization in health care - evidence from discrete choice experiments undertaken alongside citizens' juries.
    Whitty JA; Littlejohns P; Ratcliffe J; Rixon K; Wilson A; Kendall E; Burton P; Chalkidou K; Scuffham PA
    J Med Econ; 2023; 26(1):1237-1249. PubMed ID: 37738383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effectiveness of public deliberation methods for gathering input on issues in healthcare: Results from a randomized trial.
    Carman KL; Mallery C; Maurer M; Wang G; Garfinkel S; Yang M; Gilmore D; Windham A; Ginsburg M; Sofaer S; Gold M; Pathak-Sen E; Davies T; Siegel J; Mangrum R; Fernandez J; Richmond J; Fishkin J; Siu Chao A
    Soc Sci Med; 2015 May; 133():11-20. PubMed ID: 25828260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Engaging the public in priority-setting for health technology assessment: findings from a citizens' jury.
    Menon D; Stafinski T
    Health Expect; 2008 Sep; 11(3):282-93. PubMed ID: 18816324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Investigating the Extent to Which Patients Should Control Access to Patient Records for Research: A Deliberative Process Using Citizens' Juries.
    Tully MP; Bozentko K; Clement S; Hunn A; Hassan L; Norris R; Oswald M; Peek N
    J Med Internet Res; 2018 Mar; 20(3):e112. PubMed ID: 29592847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing the impact of deliberative processes on the views of participants: is it 'in one ear and out the other'?
    Stafinski T; Menon D; Yasui Y
    Health Expect; 2014 Apr; 17(2):278-90. PubMed ID: 22296492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating the use of citizens' juries in food policy: a case study of food regulation.
    Henderson J; House E; Coveney J; Meyer S; Ankeny R; Ward P; Calnan M
    BMC Public Health; 2013 Jun; 13():596. PubMed ID: 23782688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Science and deliberation].
    Ravazzi S
    Epidemiol Prev; 2008; 32(6):319-24. PubMed ID: 19353967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Which public and why deliberate?--A scoping review of public deliberation in public health and health policy research.
    Degeling C; Carter SM; Rychetnik L
    Soc Sci Med; 2015 Apr; 131():114-21. PubMed ID: 25770463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influencing health policy through public deliberation: Lessons learned from two decades of Citizens'/community juries.
    Degeling C; Rychetnik L; Street J; Thomas R; Carter SM
    Soc Sci Med; 2017 Apr; 179():166-171. PubMed ID: 28285232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does the community want devolved authority? Results of deliberative polling in Ontario.
    Abelson J; Lomas J; Eyles J; Birch S; Veenstra G
    CMAJ; 1995 Aug; 153(4):403-12. PubMed ID: 7634217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. From passive subject to active agent: the potential of Citizens' Juries for nursing research.
    Iredale R; Longley M
    Nurse Educ Today; 2007 Oct; 27(7):788-95. PubMed ID: 17157967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Public Engagement through Inclusive Deliberation: The Human Genome International Commission and Citizens' Juries.
    Scheinerman N
    Am J Bioeth; 2023 Dec; 23(12):66-76. PubMed ID: 36476040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Moving beyond the Court of Public Opinion: A Citizens' Jury Exploring the Public's Values around Funding Decisions for Ultra-Orphan Drugs.
    Stafinski T; Street J; Young A; Menon D
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Dec; 20(1):. PubMed ID: 36612953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Trading off accuracy and explainability in AI decision-making: findings from 2 citizens' juries.
    van der Veer SN; Riste L; Cheraghi-Sohi S; Phipps DL; Tully MP; Bozentko K; Atwood S; Hubbard A; Wiper C; Oswald M; Peek N
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2021 Sep; 28(10):2128-2138. PubMed ID: 34333646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Trade-offs, fairness, and funding for cancer drugs: key findings from a deliberative public engagement event in British Columbia, Canada.
    Bentley C; Costa S; Burgess MM; Regier D; McTaggart-Cowan H; Peacock SJ
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 May; 18(1):339. PubMed ID: 29739463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Making policy decisions about population screening for breast cancer: the role of citizens' deliberation.
    Paul C; Nicholls R; Priest P; McGee R
    Health Policy; 2008 Mar; 85(3):314-20. PubMed ID: 17931738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Citizens' Perspectives on Disinvestment from Publicly Funded Pathology Tests: A Deliberative Forum.
    Street JM; Callaghan P; Braunack-Mayer AJ; Hiller JE
    Value Health; 2015 Dec; 18(8):1050-6. PubMed ID: 26686790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.