These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29753349)

  • 41. Research priorities in urinary incontinence: results from citizens' juries.
    Herbison P; Hay-Smith J; Paterson H; Ellis G; Wilson D
    BJOG; 2009 Apr; 116(5):713-8. PubMed ID: 19298439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Giving voice to the pragmatic majority in New Jersey.
    Hill TP
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(5):20. PubMed ID: 2228579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Evaluation of two methods of deliberative participation of older people in food-policy development.
    Timotijevic L; Raats MM
    Health Policy; 2007 Aug; 82(3):302-19. PubMed ID: 17067716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. How deliberative designs empower citizens' voices: A case study on Ghana's deliberative poll on agriculture and the environment.
    Chen K
    Public Underst Sci; 2021 Feb; 30(2):179-195. PubMed ID: 33103601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. People's policies for the health of the poor globally.
    Govender V; Mooney G
    Int J Health Plann Manage; 2012; 27(2):e92-103. PubMed ID: 21674620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Citizens' juries for health policy.
    Wise J
    BMJ; 2017 Jun; 357():j2650. PubMed ID: 28576765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Deciding whether to engage the public on health care issues.
    Chafe R; Neville D; Rathwell T; Deber R
    Healthc Manage Forum; 2008; 21(3):24-8. PubMed ID: 19086482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Social preferences for prioritizing the treatment of severely ill patients: The relevance of severity, expected benefit, past health and lifetime health.
    McKie J; Richardson J
    Health Policy; 2017 Aug; 121(8):913-922. PubMed ID: 28622939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The voice of the public in public health policy and planning: the role of public judgment.
    Scutchfield FD; Ireson C; Hall L
    J Public Health Policy; 2004; 25(2):197-205; discussion 206-10. PubMed ID: 15255385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Community participation in health care decision making: is it feasible?
    Singer MA
    CMAJ; 1995 Aug; 153(4):421-4. PubMed ID: 7634219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The monetary value of a life year: evidence from a qualitative study of treatment costs.
    McKie J; Shrimpton B; Richardson J; Hurworth R
    Health Econ; 2011 Aug; 20(8):945-57. PubMed ID: 20806424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Assessing the impacts of citizen deliberations on the health technology process.
    Abelson J; Bombard Y; Gauvin FP; Simeonov D; Boesveld S
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2013 Jul; 29(3):282-9. PubMed ID: 23863188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The Social Functionality of Humor in Group-Based Research.
    Hewer R; Smith K; Fergie G
    Qual Health Res; 2019 Feb; 29(3):431-444. PubMed ID: 30340445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Engaging the public in healthcare decision-making: results from a Citizens' Jury on emergency care services.
    Scuffham PA; Moretto N; Krinks R; Burton P; Whitty JA; Wilson A; Fitzgerald G; Littlejohns P; Kendall E
    Emerg Med J; 2016 Nov; 33(11):782-788. PubMed ID: 27323789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. My health: whose responsibility? A jury decides.
    Elwood P; Longley M
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2010 Sep; 64(9):761-4. PubMed ID: 19897471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Evaluating the 2008 consensus conference on genetically modified foods in Taiwan.
    Fan MF
    Public Underst Sci; 2015 Jul; 24(5):533-46. PubMed ID: 24068183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Genetics, insurance and participation: how a Citizens' Jury reached its verdict.
    Bennett P; Smith SJ
    Soc Sci Med; 2007 Jun; 64(12):2487-98. PubMed ID: 17418469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Informing public health policy through deliberative public engagement: perceived impact on participants and citizen-government relations.
    Molster C; Potts A; McNamara B; Youngs L; Maxwell S; Dawkins H; O'Leary P
    Genet Test Mol Biomarkers; 2013 Sep; 17(9):713-8. PubMed ID: 23862565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Stock options, tax credits or employment contracts please! The value of deliberative public disagreement about human tissue donation.
    Walmsley HL
    Soc Sci Med; 2011 Jul; 73(2):209-16. PubMed ID: 21683492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Engaging the Public to Identify Opportunities to Improve Critical Care: A Qualitative Analysis of an Open Community Forum.
    Potestio ML; Boyd JM; Bagshaw SM; Heyland D; Oxland P; Doig CJ; Zygun D; Stelfox HT
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0143088. PubMed ID: 26580406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.