These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29753356)

  • 1. Measurement Equivalence of Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Response Scale Types Collected Using Bring Your Own Device Compared to Paper and a Provisioned Device: Results of a Randomized Equivalence Trial.
    Byrom B; Doll H; Muehlhausen W; Flood E; Cassedy C; McDowell B; Sohn J; Hogan K; Belmont R; Skerritt B; McCarthy M
    Value Health; 2018 May; 21(5):581-589. PubMed ID: 29753356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does scrolling affect measurement equivalence of electronic patient-reported outcome measures (ePROM)? Results of a quantitative equivalence study.
    Shahraz S; Pham TP; Gibson M; De La Cruz M; Baara M; Karnik S; Dell C; Pease S; Nigam S; Cappelleri JC; Lipset C; Zornow P; Lee J; Byrom B
    J Patient Rep Outcomes; 2021 Feb; 5(1):23. PubMed ID: 33638726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparability of a provisioned device versus bring your own device for completion of patient-reported outcome measures by participants with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: quantitative study findings.
    Hudgens S; Newton L; Eremenco S; Crescioni M; Symonds T; Griffiths PCG; Reasner DS; Byrom B; O'Donohoe P; Vallow S;
    J Patient Rep Outcomes; 2022 Nov; 6(1):119. PubMed ID: 36435889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparability of a provisioned device versus bring your own device for completion of patient-reported outcome measures by participants with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: qualitative interview findings.
    Newton L; Knight-West O; Eremenco S; Hudgens S; Crescioni M; Symonds T; Reasner DS; Byrom B; O'Donohoe P; Vallow S; ;
    J Patient Rep Outcomes; 2022 Aug; 6(1):86. PubMed ID: 35925498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measurement Equivalence of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Migrated to Electronic Formats: A Review of Evidence and Recommendations for Clinical Trials and Bring Your Own Device.
    Byrom B; Gwaltney C; Slagle A; Gnanasakthy A; Muehlhausen W
    Ther Innov Regul Sci; 2019 Jul; 53(4):426-430. PubMed ID: 30157687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force report.
    Coons SJ; Gwaltney CJ; Hays RD; Lundy JJ; Sloan JA; Revicki DA; Lenderking WR; Cella D; Basch E;
    Value Health; 2009 Jun; 12(4):419-29. PubMed ID: 19900250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Feasibility of the "Bring Your Own Device" Model in Clinical Research: Results from a Randomized Controlled Pilot Study of a Mobile Patient Engagement Tool.
    Pugliese L; Woodriff M; Crowley O; Lam V; Sohn J; Bradley S
    Cureus; 2016 Mar; 8(3):e535. PubMed ID: 27096135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bring-your-own-device in medical schools and healthcare facilities: A review of the literature.
    Kadimo K; Kebaetse MB; Ketshogileng D; Seru LE; Sebina KB; Kovarik C; Balotlegi K
    Int J Med Inform; 2018 Nov; 119():94-102. PubMed ID: 30342692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Capturing Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Data Electronically: The Past, Present, and Promise of ePRO Measurement in Clinical Trials.
    Coons SJ; Eremenco S; Lundy JJ; O'Donohoe P; O'Gorman H; Malizia W
    Patient; 2015 Aug; 8(4):301-9. PubMed ID: 25300613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mode equivalence and acceptability of tablet computer-, interactive voice response system-, and paper-based administration of the U.S. National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE).
    Bennett AV; Dueck AC; Mitchell SA; Mendoza TR; Reeve BB; Atkinson TM; Castro KM; Denicoff A; Rogak LJ; Harness JK; Bearden JD; Bryant D; Siegel RD; Schrag D; Basch E;
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2016 Feb; 14():24. PubMed ID: 26892667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Equivalence of electronic and paper administration of patient-reported outcome measures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies conducted between 2007 and 2013.
    Muehlhausen W; Doll H; Quadri N; Fordham B; O'Donohoe P; Dogar N; Wild DJ
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2015 Oct; 13():167. PubMed ID: 26446159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hospital Bring-Your-Own-Device Security Challenges and Solutions: Systematic Review of Gray Literature.
    Wani TA; Mendoza A; Gray K
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2020 Jun; 8(6):e18175. PubMed ID: 32554388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. "Bring Your Own Device" (BYOD): The Future of Field-Based Patient-Reported Outcome Data Collection in Clinical Trials?
    Gwaltney C; Coons SJ; O'Donohoe P; O'Gorman H; Denomey M; Howry C; Ross J
    Ther Innov Regul Sci; 2015 Nov; 49(6):783-791. PubMed ID: 30222388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. To BYOD or not: Are device latencies important for bring-your-own-device (BYOD) smartphone cognitive testing?
    Nicosia J; Wang B; Aschenbrenner AJ; Sliwinski MJ; Yabiku ST; Roque NA; Germine LT; Bateman RJ; Morris JC; Hassenstab J
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Sep; 55(6):2800-2812. PubMed ID: 35953659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Regulatory Acceptance of Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Data from Bring-Your-Own-Device (BYOD) Solutions to Support Medical Product Labeling Claims : Let's Share the Success Stories to Move the Industry Forward.
    Mowlem FD; Tenaerts P; Gwaltney C; Oakley-Girvan I
    Ther Innov Regul Sci; 2022 Jul; 56(4):531-535. PubMed ID: 35534774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Paper and electronic versions of HM-PRO, a novel patient-reported outcome measure for hematology: an equivalence study.
    Goswami P; Oliva EN; Ionova T; Else R; Kell J; Fielding AK; Jennings DM; Karakantza M; Al-Ismail S; Lyness J; Collins GP; McConnell S; Langton C; Al-Obaidi MJ; Oblak M; Salek S
    J Comp Eff Res; 2019 May; 8(7):523-533. PubMed ID: 31037971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Considerations for Conducting Bring Your Own "Device" (BYOD) Clinical Studies.
    Demanuele C; Lokker C; Jhaveri K; Georgiev P; Sezgin E; Geoghegan C; Zou KH; Izmailova E; McCarthy M
    Digit Biomark; 2022; 6(2):47-60. PubMed ID: 35949223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Mobile App Development Guideline for Hospital Settings: Maximizing the Use of and Minimizing the Security Risks of "Bring Your Own Devices" Policies.
    Al Ayubi SU; Pelletier A; Sunthara G; Gujral N; Mittal V; Bourgeois FC
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2016 May; 4(2):e50. PubMed ID: 27169345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the paper-based and electronic versions of the Dermatology Life Quality Index: evidence of equivalence.
    Ali FM; Johns N; Finlay AY; Salek MS; Piguet V
    Br J Dermatol; 2017 Nov; 177(5):1306-1315. PubMed ID: 28112800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The feasibility of using 'bring your own device' (BYOD) technology for electronic data capture in multicentre medical audit and research.
    Faulds MC; Bauchmuller K; Miller D; Rosser JH; Shuker K; Wrench I; Wilson P; Mills GH;
    Anaesthesia; 2016 Jan; 71(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 26526934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.