These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29754036)

  • 1. Electrophysiological decomposition of attentional factors on the hypercorrection effect of false lexical representations.
    Iwaki N; Tanaka S
    Brain Cogn; 2018 Jul; 124():64-72. PubMed ID: 29754036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hypercorrection of high confidence errors in lexical representations.
    Iwaki N; Matsushima H; Kodaira K
    Percept Mot Skills; 2013 Aug; 117(1):1261-77. PubMed ID: 24422352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hypercorrection of high-confidence errors in the classroom.
    Carpenter SK; Haynes CL; Corral D; Yeung KL
    Memory; 2018 Nov; 26(10):1379-1384. PubMed ID: 29781391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An exploratory high-density EEG investigation of the misinformation effect: Attentional and recollective differences between true and false perceptual memories.
    Kiat JE; Belli RF
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2017 May; 141():199-208. PubMed ID: 28442391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On Teaching Old Dogs New Tricks.
    Metcalfe J; Casal-Roscum L; Radin A; Friedman D
    Psychol Sci; 2015 Dec; 26(12):1833-42. PubMed ID: 26494598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of memory set-size upon event related potentials for concrete and abstract kanji stimuli.
    Osaka M
    Percept Mot Skills; 1992 Oct; 75(2):401-2. PubMed ID: 1408598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neural correlates of error detection and correction in a semantic retrieval task.
    Butterfield B; Mangels JA
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2003 Oct; 17(3):793-817. PubMed ID: 14561464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Processes contributing to forward and backward span: an ERP investigation.
    Nulsen CE; Fox AM; Hammond GR
    Neuroreport; 2010 Mar; 21(4):298-302. PubMed ID: 20125053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Beyond hypercorrection: remembering corrective feedback for low-confidence errors.
    Griffiths L; Higham PA
    Memory; 2018 Feb; 26(2):201-218. PubMed ID: 28671026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prior knowledge is more predictive of error correction than subjective confidence.
    Sitzman DM; Rhodes MG; Tauber SK
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Jan; 42(1):84-96. PubMed ID: 23797971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of the P3 and CNV components in voluntary and automatic temporal orienting: A high spatial-resolution ERP study.
    Mento G
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Dec; 107():31-40. PubMed ID: 29109036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. N200, N250r, and N400 event-related brain potentials reveal three loci of repetition priming for familiar names.
    Pickering EC; Schweinberger SR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1298-311. PubMed ID: 14622062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Event-related potential evidence that automatic recollection can be voluntarily avoided.
    Bergström ZM; de Fockert J; Richardson-Klavehn A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jul; 21(7):1280-301. PubMed ID: 18702575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How does error correction occur during lexical learning?
    Iwaki N; Takahashi I; Kaneko S
    Psychol Res; 2024 Jun; 88(4):1272-1287. PubMed ID: 38488873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of feedback on predictions of future memory performance.
    Sitzman DM; Rhodes MG; Kornell N
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Oct; 44(7):1102-13. PubMed ID: 27245926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A change of task prolongs early processes: evidence from ERPs in lexical tasks.
    Elchlepp H; Lavric A; Monsell S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2015 Apr; 144(2):299-325. PubMed ID: 25844623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surprising feedback improves later memory.
    Fazio LK; Marsh EJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Feb; 16(1):88-92. PubMed ID: 19145015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Emotional contexts modulate intentional memory suppression of neutral faces: Insights from ERPs.
    Pierguidi L; Righi S; Gronchi G; Marzi T; Caharel S; Giovannelli F; Viggiano MP
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2016 Aug; 106():1-13. PubMed ID: 27234617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An electrophysiological investigation of the relationship between conceptual fluency and familiarity.
    Wolk DA; Schacter DL; Berman AR; Holcomb PJ; Daffner KR; Budson AE
    Neurosci Lett; 2004 Oct; 369(2):150-5. PubMed ID: 15450686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attentional modulation of early ERP components in response to faces: evidence from the attentional blink paradigm.
    Darque A; Del Zotto M; Khateb A; Pegna AJ
    Brain Topogr; 2012 Apr; 25(2):167-81. PubMed ID: 21858700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.