These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29755004)

  • 1. I know why you voted for Trump: (Over)inferring motives based on choice.
    Barasz K; Kim T; Evangelidis I
    Cognition; 2019 Jul; 188():85-97. PubMed ID: 29755004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A rational model of people's inferences about others' preferences based on response times.
    Gates V; Callaway F; Ho MK; Griffiths TL
    Cognition; 2021 Dec; 217():104885. PubMed ID: 34454336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Choice perception: Making sense (and nonsense) of others' decisions.
    Barasz K; Kim T
    Curr Opin Psychol; 2022 Feb; 43():176-181. PubMed ID: 34403961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Memory-Based Simple Heuristics as Attribute Substitution: Competitive Tests of Binary Choice Inference Models.
    Honda H; Matsuka T; Ueda K
    Cogn Sci; 2017 May; 41 Suppl 5():1093-1118. PubMed ID: 27435359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Decision heuristic or preference? Attribute non-attendance in discrete choice problems.
    Heidenreich S; Watson V; Ryan M; Phimister E
    Health Econ; 2018 Jan; 27(1):157-171. PubMed ID: 28620975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An attentional drift diffusion model over binary-attribute choice.
    Fisher G
    Cognition; 2017 Nov; 168():34-45. PubMed ID: 28646751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Six of one, half dozen of the other: expanding and contracting numerical dimensions produces preference reversals.
    Burson KA; Larrick RP; Lynch JG
    Psychol Sci; 2009 Sep; 20(9):1074-8. PubMed ID: 19572972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accounting for Attribute-Level Non-Attendance in a Health Choice Experiment: Does it Matter?
    Erdem S; Campbell D; Hole AR
    Health Econ; 2015 Jul; 24(7):773-89. PubMed ID: 24798402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A lack of appetite for information and computation. Simple heuristics in food choice.
    Schulte-Mecklenbeck M; Sohn M; de Bellis E; Martin N; Hertwig R
    Appetite; 2013 Dec; 71():242-51. PubMed ID: 23994507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Familiarity-Matching: An Ecologically Rational Heuristic for the Relationships-Comparison Task.
    Shirasuna M; Honda H; Matsuka T; Ueda K
    Cogn Sci; 2020 Feb; 44(2):e12806. PubMed ID: 31981246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Seeing approach motivation in the avoidance behavior of others: implications for an understanding of pluralistic ignorance.
    Miller DT; Nelson LD
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2002 Nov; 83(5):1066-75. PubMed ID: 12416912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Behavioral variability of choices versus structural inconsistency of preferences.
    Regenwetter M; Davis-Stober CP
    Psychol Rev; 2012 Apr; 119(2):408-16. PubMed ID: 22506679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rejecting a bad option feels like choosing a good one.
    Perfecto H; Galak J; Simmons JP; Nelson LD
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2017 Nov; 113(5):659-670. PubMed ID: 28737416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Risk preference: How decision maker's goal, current value state, and choice set work together.
    Zou X; Scholer AA; Higgins ET
    Psychol Rev; 2020 Jan; 127(1):74-94. PubMed ID: 31414876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accounting for Taste: A Multi-Attribute Neurocomputational Model Explains the Neural Dynamics of Choices for Self and Others.
    Harris A; Clithero JA; Hutcherson CA
    J Neurosci; 2018 Sep; 38(37):7952-7968. PubMed ID: 30076214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lateral orbitofrontal cortex links social impressions to political choices.
    Xia C; Stolle D; Gidengil E; Fellows LK
    J Neurosci; 2015 Jun; 35(22):8507-14. PubMed ID: 26041918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sophisticated approval voting, ignorance priors, and plurality heuristics: a behavioral social choice analysis in a Thurstonian framework.
    Regenwetter M; Ho MH; Tsetlin I
    Psychol Rev; 2007 Oct; 114(4):994-1014. PubMed ID: 17907870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Humans can infer social preferences from decision speed alone.
    Bavard S; Stuchlý E; Konovalov A; Gluth S
    PLoS Biol; 2024 Jun; 22(6):e3002686. PubMed ID: 38900903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Understanding the Cognitive and Affective Mechanisms that Underlie Proxy Risk Perceptions among Caregivers of Asthmatic Children.
    Shepperd JA; Lipsey NP; Pachur T; Waters EA
    Med Decis Making; 2018 Jul; 38(5):562-572. PubMed ID: 29629847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Making sense of candidates: partisanship, ideology, and issues as guides to judgment.
    Huckfeldt R; Mondak JJ; Craw M; Mendez JM
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Apr; 23(1):11-23. PubMed ID: 15795130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.