These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29755848)

  • 41. CT dose reduction using Automatic Exposure Control and iterative reconstruction: A chest paediatric phantoms study.
    Greffier J; Pereira F; Macri F; Beregi JP; Larbi A
    Phys Med; 2016 Apr; 32(4):582-9. PubMed ID: 27056436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Optimization of the chest computed tomography scan by varying the position of the arms].
    Matsumoto Y; Masuda T; Imada N; Maruyama N; Inada S; Ishibashi T; Satou T
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2012; 68(7):851-6. PubMed ID: 22821158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Automatic exposure control systems designed to maintain constant image noise: effects on computed tomography dose and noise relative to clinically accepted technique charts.
    Favazza CP; Yu L; Leng S; Kofler JM; McCollough CH
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(3):437-42. PubMed ID: 25938214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. ESTIMATION OF RADIATION DOSE IN CT VENOGRAPHY OF THE LOWER EXTREMITIES: PHANTOM EXPERIMENTS USING DIFFERENT AUTOMATIC EXPOSURE CONTROL SETTINGS AND SCAN RANGES.
    Inoue Y; Itoh H; Nagahara K; Takahashi Y
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2020 Jun; 188(1):109-116. PubMed ID: 31822914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Changing the Patient's Position: Pitfalls and Benefits for Radiation Dose and Image Quality of Computed Tomography in Polytrauma.
    Graef J; Bressem KK; Asbach P; Hamm B; Niehues SM
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2022 Nov; 12(11):. PubMed ID: 36359504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Automatic exposure control at single- and dual-heartbeat CTCA on a 320-MDCT volume scanner: effect of heart rate, exposure phase window setting, and reconstruction algorithm.
    Funama Y; Utsunomiya D; Taguchi K; Oda S; Shimonobo T; Yamashita Y
    Phys Med; 2014 May; 30(3):385-90. PubMed ID: 24225011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Automatic Exposure Control Attains Radiation Dose Modulation Matched with the Head Size in Pediatric Brain CT.
    Inoue Y; Itoh H; Miyatake H; Hata H; Sasa R; Shiibashi N; Mitsui K
    Tomography; 2022 Dec; 8(6):2929-2938. PubMed ID: 36548538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Estimating patient dose from CT exams that use automatic exposure control: Development and validation of methods to accurately estimate tube current values.
    McMillan K; Bostani M; Cagnon CH; Yu L; Leng S; McCollough CH; McNitt-Gray MF
    Med Phys; 2017 Aug; 44(8):4262-4275. PubMed ID: 28477342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Effect of automatic tube current modulation on radiation dose and image quality for low tube voltage multidetector row CT angiography: phantom study.
    Schindera ST; Nelson RC; Yoshizumi T; Toncheva G; Nguyen G; DeLong DM; Szucs-Farkas Z
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Aug; 16(8):997-1002. PubMed ID: 19409820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Automatic exposure control calibration and optimisation for abdomen, pelvis and lumbar spine imaging with an Agfa computed radiography system.
    Moore CS; Wood TJ; Avery G; Balcam S; Needler L; Joshi H; Saunderson JR; Beavis AW
    Phys Med Biol; 2016 Nov; 61(21):N551-N564. PubMed ID: 27716642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Inadequate object positioning and improvement of automatic exposure control system calculations based on an empirical algorithm.
    Furukawa Y; Matsubara K; Miyati T
    Phys Eng Sci Med; 2021 Mar; 44(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 33252720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Correlation of cross-sectional diameter with image quality and radiation exposure in MDCT examinations of the neck.
    Hoang JK; Gafton AR; Eastwood JD; Chen LF; Hurwitz LM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Nov; 197(5):W904-9. PubMed ID: 22021540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Use of an automatic exposure control mechanism for dose optimization in multi-detector row CT examinations: clinical evaluation.
    Mulkens TH; Bellinck P; Baeyaert M; Ghysen D; Van Dijck X; Mussen E; Venstermans C; Termote JL
    Radiology; 2005 Oct; 237(1):213-23. PubMed ID: 16126917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Detection of urinary tract stones at low-radiation-dose CT with z-axis automatic tube current modulation: phantom and clinical studies.
    Kalra MK; Maher MM; D'Souza RV; Rizzo S; Halpern EF; Blake MA; Saini S
    Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):523-9. PubMed ID: 15770037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Arm raising at exposure-controlled multidetector trauma CT of thoracoabdominal region: higher image quality, lower radiation dose.
    Brink M; de Lange F; Oostveen LJ; Dekker HM; Kool DR; Deunk J; Edwards MJ; van Kuijk C; Kamman RL; Blickman JG
    Radiology; 2008 Nov; 249(2):661-70. PubMed ID: 18936319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. INFLUENCE OF LOCALIZER AND SCAN DIRECTION ON THE DOSE-REDUCING EFFECT OF AUTOMATIC TUBE CURRENT MODULATION IN COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY.
    Franck C; Bacher K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):136-42. PubMed ID: 27056145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Low-dose computed tomography scans with automatic exposure control for patients of different ages undergoing cardiac PET/CT and SPECT/CT.
    Yang CC; Yang BH; Tu CY; Wu TH; Liu SH
    Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Jun; 38(6):546-555. PubMed ID: 28430740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Radiation dose modulation techniques in the multidetector CT era: from basics to practice.
    Lee CH; Goo JM; Ye HJ; Ye SJ; Park CM; Chun EJ; Im JG
    Radiographics; 2008; 28(5):1451-9. PubMed ID: 18794318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Effective dose and image quality evaluations of an automatic CT tube current modulation system with an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Rampado O; Marchisio F; Izzo A; Garelli E; Bianchi CC; Gandini G; Ropolo R
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Oct; 72(1):181-7. PubMed ID: 18692337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Dose reduction and image quality assessment in MDCT using AEC (D-DOM & Z-DOM) and in-plane bismuth shielding.
    Lee K; Lee W; Lee J; Lee B; Oh G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Sep; 141(2):162-7. PubMed ID: 20511402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.