303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29756458)
1. Evaluation of the effects of adding vibrotactile feedback to myoelectric prosthesis users on performance and visual attention in a dual-task paradigm.
Raveh E; Friedman J; Portnoy S
Clin Rehabil; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1308-1316. PubMed ID: 29756458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Myoelectric Prosthesis Users Improve Performance Time and Accuracy Using Vibrotactile Feedback When Visual Feedback Is Disturbed.
Raveh E; Portnoy S; Friedman J
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2018 Nov; 99(11):2263-2270. PubMed ID: 29935153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Visuomotor behaviors and performance in a dual-task paradigm with and without vibrotactile feedback when using a myoelectric controlled hand.
Raveh E; Friedman J; Portnoy S
Assist Technol; 2018; 30(5):274-280. PubMed ID: 28628379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Vibrotactile grasping force and hand aperture feedback for myoelectric forearm prosthesis users.
Witteveen HJ; Rietman HS; Veltink PH
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2015 Jun; 39(3):204-12. PubMed ID: 24567348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Adding vibrotactile feedback to a myoelectric-controlled hand improves performance when online visual feedback is disturbed.
Raveh E; Portnoy S; Friedman J
Hum Mov Sci; 2018 Apr; 58():32-40. PubMed ID: 29353091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of vibrotactile feedback and grasp interface compliance on perception and control of a sensorized myoelectric hand.
Pena AE; Rincon-Gonzalez L; Abbas JJ; Jung R
PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0210956. PubMed ID: 30650161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Non-Invasive, Temporally Discrete Feedback of Object Contact and Release Improves Grasp Control of Closed-Loop Myoelectric Transradial Prostheses.
Clemente F; D'Alonzo M; Controzzi M; Edin BB; Cipriani C
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2016 Dec; 24(12):1314-1322. PubMed ID: 26584497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intraneural sensory feedback restores grip force control and motor coordination while using a prosthetic hand.
Clemente F; Valle G; Controzzi M; Strauss I; Iberite F; Stieglitz T; Granata G; Rossini PM; Petrini F; Micera S; Cipriani C
J Neural Eng; 2019 Apr; 16(2):026034. PubMed ID: 30736030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of vibrotactile and joint-torque feedback in a myoelectric upper-limb prosthesis.
Thomas N; Ung G; McGarvey C; Brown JD
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2019 Jun; 16(1):70. PubMed ID: 31186005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. EMG Biofeedback for online predictive control of grasping force in a myoelectric prosthesis.
Dosen S; Markovic M; Somer K; Graimann B; Farina D
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2015 Jun; 12():55. PubMed ID: 26088323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sensory substitution of elbow proprioception to improve myoelectric control of upper limb prosthesis: experiment on healthy subjects and amputees.
Guémann M; Halgand C; Bastier A; Lansade C; Borrini L; Lapeyre É; Cattaert D; de Rugy A
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2022 Jun; 19(1):59. PubMed ID: 35690860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hand-opening feedback for myoelectric forearm prostheses: performance in virtual grasping tasks influenced by different levels of distraction.
Witteveen HJ; de Rond L; Rietman JS; Veltink PH
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2012; 49(10):1517-26. PubMed ID: 23516055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relative to direct haptic feedback, remote vibrotactile feedback improves but slows object manipulation.
Stepp CE; Matsuoka Y
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():2089-92. PubMed ID: 21095683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Myocontrol is closed-loop control: incidental feedback is sufficient for scaling the prosthesis force in routine grasping.
Markovic M; Schweisfurth MA; Engels LF; Farina D; Dosen S
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 Sep; 15(1):81. PubMed ID: 30176929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Psychometric characterization of incidental feedback sources during grasping with a hand prosthesis.
Wilke MA; Niethammer C; Meyer B; Farina D; Dosen S
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2019 Dec; 16(1):155. PubMed ID: 31823792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Closed-loop control of grasping with a myoelectric hand prosthesis: which are the relevant feedback variables for force control?
Ninu A; Dosen S; Muceli S; Rattay F; Dietl H; Farina D
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2014 Sep; 22(5):1041-52. PubMed ID: 24801625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The clinical relevance of advanced artificial feedback in the control of a multi-functional myoelectric prosthesis.
Markovic M; Schweisfurth MA; Engels LF; Bentz T; Wüstefeld D; Farina D; Dosen S
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 Mar; 15(1):28. PubMed ID: 29580245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Vibro- and electrotactile user feedback on hand opening for myoelectric forearm prostheses.
Witteveen HJ; Droog EA; Rietman JS; Veltink PH
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2012 Aug; 59(8):2219-26. PubMed ID: 22645262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Haptic shared control improves neural efficiency during myoelectric prosthesis use.
Thomas N; Miller AJ; Ayaz H; Brown JD
Sci Rep; 2023 Jan; 13(1):484. PubMed ID: 36627340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Getting a Grip on the Impact of Incidental Feedback From Body-Powered and Myoelectric Prostheses.
Gonzalez MA; Lee C; Kang J; Gillespie RB; Gates DH
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2021; 29():1905-1912. PubMed ID: 34516377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
