These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

323 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29757799)

  • 1. Improved Detection of Vowel Envelope Frequency Following Responses Using Hotelling's T2 Analysis.
    Vanheusden FJ; Bell SL; Chesnaye MA; Simpson DM
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):116-127. PubMed ID: 29757799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Envelope following responses elicited by English sentences.
    Choi JM; Purcell DW; Coyne JA; Aiken SJ
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):637-50. PubMed ID: 23575462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Brainstem auditory responses to resolved and unresolved harmonics of a synthetic vowel in quiet and noise.
    Laroche M; Dajani HR; Prévost F; Marcoux AM
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 22814487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Accuracy of Envelope Following Responses in Predicting Speech Audibility.
    Easwar V; Birstler J; Harrison A; Scollie S; Purcell D
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(6):1732-1746. PubMed ID: 33136646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Envelope frequency following responses are stronger for high-pass than low-pass filtered vowels.
    Vanheusden FJ; Chesnaye MA; Simpson DM; Bell SL
    Int J Audiol; 2019 Jun; 58(6):355-362. PubMed ID: 30675827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of Stimulus Level and Bandwidth on Speech-Evoked Envelope Following Responses in Adults With Normal Hearing.
    Easwar V; Purcell DW; Aiken SJ; Parsa V; Scollie SD
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):619-34. PubMed ID: 26226607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Human Frequency Following Responses to Filtered Speech.
    Ananthakrishnan S; Grinstead L; Yurjevich D
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(1):87-105. PubMed ID: 33369591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Test-Retest Variability in the Characteristics of Envelope Following Responses Evoked by Speech Stimuli.
    Easwar V; Scollie S; Aiken S; Purcell D
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(1):150-164. PubMed ID: 31136317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of Speech-Evoked Envelope Following Responses as an Objective Aided Outcome Measure: Effect of Stimulus Level, Bandwidth, and Amplification in Adults With Hearing Loss.
    Easwar V; Purcell DW; Aiken SJ; Parsa V; Scollie SD
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):635-52. PubMed ID: 26226606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speech Auditory Brainstem Responses: Effects of Background, Stimulus Duration, Consonant-Vowel, and Number of Epochs.
    BinKhamis G; Léger A; Bell SL; Prendergast G; O'Driscoll M; Kluk K
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(3):659-670. PubMed ID: 30124503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Human Frequency Following Responses to Vocoded Speech.
    Ananthakrishnan S; Luo X; Krishnan A
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e256-e267. PubMed ID: 28362674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Effect of Signal to Noise Ratio on Cortical Auditory-Evoked Potentials Elicited to Speech Stimuli in Infants and Adults With Normal Hearing.
    Small SA; Sharma M; Bradford M; Mandikal Vasuki PR
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):305-317. PubMed ID: 28863034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech Auditory Brainstem Response through hearing aid stimulation.
    Bellier L; Veuillet E; Vesson JF; Bouchet P; Caclin A; Thai-Van H
    Hear Res; 2015 Jul; 325():49-54. PubMed ID: 25828076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sensitivity of envelope following responses to vowel polarity.
    Easwar V; Beamish L; Aiken S; Choi JM; Scollie S; Purcell D
    Hear Res; 2015 Feb; 320():38-50. PubMed ID: 25500177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Objective measurement of physiological signal-to-noise gain in the brainstem response to a synthetic vowel.
    Prévost F; Laroche M; Marcoux AM; Dajani HR
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2013 Jan; 124(1):52-60. PubMed ID: 22688081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The detection of infant cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) using statistical and visual detection techniques.
    Carter L; Golding M; Dillon H; Seymour J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 May; 21(5):347-56. PubMed ID: 20569668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Brainstem correlates of concurrent speech identification in adverse listening conditions.
    Yellamsetty A; Bidelman GM
    Brain Res; 2019 Jul; 1714():182-192. PubMed ID: 30796895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Phase-locked responses to the vowel envelope vary in scalp-recorded amplitude due to across-frequency response interactions.
    Easwar V; Banyard A; Aiken SJ; Purcell DW
    Eur J Neurosci; 2018 Nov; 48(10):3126-3145. PubMed ID: 30240514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Auditory brainstem response recording to multiple interleaved broadband chirps.
    Cebulla M; Stürzebecher E; Don M; Müller-Mazzotta J
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):466-79. PubMed ID: 22343544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Objective measures for detecting the auditory brainstem response: comparisons of specificity, sensitivity and detection time.
    Chesnaye MA; Bell SL; Harte JM; Simpson DM
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(6):468-478. PubMed ID: 29537327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.