360 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29758220)
1. Evaluation of an Aggressive Prostate Biopsy Strategy in Men Younger than 50 Years.
Goldberg H; Klaassen Z; Chandrasekar T; Wallis CJD; Toi A; Sayyid R; Bhindi B; Nesbitt M; Evans A; van der Kwast T; Sweet J; Perlis N; Hamilton RJ; Kulkarni GS; Finelli A; Zlotta A; Fleshner N
J Urol; 2018 Nov; 200(5):1056-1061. PubMed ID: 29758220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk Factors for Biopsy Reclassification over Time in Men on Active Surveillance for Early Stage Prostate Cancer.
Lonergan PE; Washington SL; Cowan JE; Zhao S; Nguyen HG; Shinohara K; Cooperberg MR; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2020 Dec; 204(6):1216-1221. PubMed ID: 32519915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Limitations in Predicting Organ Confined Prostate Cancer in Patients with Gleason Pattern 4 on Biopsy: Implications for Active Surveillance.
Perlis N; Sayyid R; Evans A; Van Der Kwast T; Toi A; Finelli A; Kulkarni G; Hamilton R; Zlotta AR; Trachtenberg J; Ghai S; Fleshner NE
J Urol; 2017 Jan; 197(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 27457260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of Digital Rectal Examination as an Adjunct to Prostate Specific Antigen in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Halpern JA; Oromendia C; Shoag JE; Mittal S; Cosiano MF; Ballman KV; Vickers AJ; Hu JC
J Urol; 2018 Apr; 199(4):947-953. PubMed ID: 29061540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Long-Term Risks of Metastases in Men on Active Surveillance for Early Stage Prostate Cancer.
Maggi M; Cowan JE; Fasulo V; Washington SL; Lonergan PE; Sciarra A; Nguyen HG; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2020 Dec; 204(6):1222-1228. PubMed ID: 33157570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pathological upgrading in prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance: Does prostate-specific antigen density matter?
Jin BS; Kang SH; Kim DY; Oh HG; Kim CI; Moon GH; Kwon TG; Park JS
Korean J Urol; 2015 Sep; 56(9):624-9. PubMed ID: 26366274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. National Comprehensive Cancer Network® Favorable Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer-Is Active Surveillance Appropriate?
Aghazadeh MA; Frankel J; Belanger M; McLaughlin T; Tortora J; Staff I; Wagner JR
J Urol; 2018 May; 199(5):1196-1201. PubMed ID: 29288120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Guy's and St Thomas NHS Foundation active surveillance prostate cancer cohort: a characterisation of a prostate cancer active surveillance database.
Shah S; Beckmann K; Van Hemelrijck M; Challacombe B; Popert R; Dasgupta P; Rusere J; Zisengwe G; Elhage O; Santaolalla A
BMC Cancer; 2021 May; 21(1):573. PubMed ID: 34011308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tumor Volume on Biopsy of Low Risk Prostate Cancer Managed with Active Surveillance.
Tosoian JJ; Mamawala M; Patel HD; Alam R; Epstein JI; Ross AE; Carter HB
J Urol; 2018 Apr; 199(4):954-960. PubMed ID: 29074222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Negative Prebiopsy Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Risk of Significant Prostate Cancer: Baseline and Long-Term Followup Results.
Buisset J; Norris JM; Puech P; Leroy X; Ramdane N; Drumez E; Villers A; Olivier J
J Urol; 2021 Mar; 205(3):725-731. PubMed ID: 33080153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Metastatic Prostate Cancer in Men Initially Treated with Active Surveillance.
Yamamoto T; Musunuru HB; Vesprini D; Zhang L; Ghanem G; Loblaw A; Klotz L
J Urol; 2016 May; 195(5):1409-1414. PubMed ID: 26707510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. African American Race is Not Associated with Risk of Reclassification during Active Surveillance: Results from the Canary Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance Study.
Schenk JM; Newcomb LF; Zheng Y; Faino AV; Zhu K; Nyame YA; Brooks JD; Carroll PR; Cooperberg MR; Dash A; Filson CP; Gleave ME; Liss M; Martin FM; Morgan TM; Nelson PS; Thompson IM; Wagner AA; Lin DW
J Urol; 2020 Apr; 203(4):727-733. PubMed ID: 31651227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Regular transition zone biopsy during active surveillance for prostate cancer may improve detection of pathological progression.
Wong LM; Toi A; Van der Kwast T; Trottier G; Alibhai SM; Timilshina N; Evans A; Zlotta A; Fleshner N; Finelli A
J Urol; 2014 Oct; 192(4):1088-93. PubMed ID: 24742593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Extended use of Prostate Health Index and percentage of [-2]pro-prostate-specific antigen in Chinese men with prostate specific antigen 10-20 ng/mL and normal digital rectal examination.
Chiu PK; Teoh JY; Lee WM; Yee CH; Chan ES; Hou SM; Ng CF
Investig Clin Urol; 2016 Sep; 57(5):336-42. PubMed ID: 27617315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Population based study of predictors of adverse pathology among candidates for active surveillance with Gleason 6 prostate cancer.
Vellekoop A; Loeb S; Folkvaljon Y; Stattin P
J Urol; 2014 Feb; 191(2):350-7. PubMed ID: 24071481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration is positively associated with rate of disease reclassification on subsequent active surveillance prostate biopsy in men with low PSA density.
Umbehr MH; Platz EA; Peskoe SB; Bhavsar NA; Epstein JI; Landis P; Partin AW; Carter HB
BJU Int; 2014 Apr; 113(4):561-7. PubMed ID: 23746233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prostate cancers diagnosed at repeat biopsy are smaller and less likely to be high grade.
Tan N; Lane BR; Li J; Moussa AS; Soriano M; Jones JS
J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1325-9; discussion 1329. PubMed ID: 18707706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Clinical Significance of Multiple Negative Surveillance Prostate Biopsies for Men on Active Surveillance-Does Cancer Vanish or Simply Hide?
Chu CE; Cowan JE; Fasulo V; Washington SL; de la Calle C; Shoemaker J; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2021 Jan; 205(1):109-114. PubMed ID: 33198555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Pathological and Oncologic Outcomes of Favorable Risk Gleason Score 3 + 4 and Low Risk Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer: Considerations for Active Surveillance.
Gearman DJ; Morlacco A; Cheville JC; Rangel LJ; Karnes RJ
J Urol; 2018 May; 199(5):1188-1195. PubMed ID: 29225057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Incidence and Predictors of Upgrading and Up Staging among 10,000 Contemporary Patients with Low Risk Prostate Cancer.
Dinh KT; Mahal BA; Ziehr DR; Muralidhar V; Chen YW; Viswanathan VB; Nezolosky MD; Beard CJ; Choueiri TK; Martin NE; Orio PF; Sweeney CJ; Trinh QD; Nguyen PL
J Urol; 2015 Aug; 194(2):343-9. PubMed ID: 25681290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
