BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29759435)

  • 1. Temporal Trends in and Factors Associated With Use of Single- Versus Dual-Coil Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Leads: Data From the NCDR ICD Registry.
    Pokorney SD; Parzynski CS; Daubert JP; Hegland DD; Varosy PD; Curtis JP; Al-Khatib SM
    JACC Clin Electrophysiol; 2017 Jun; 3(6):612-619. PubMed ID: 29759435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Single-coil and dual-coil defibrillator leads and association with clinical outcomes in a complete Danish nationwide ICD cohort.
    Larsen JM; Hjortshøj SP; Nielsen JC; Johansen JB; Petersen HH; Haarbo J; Johansen MB; Thøgersen AM
    Heart Rhythm; 2016 Mar; 13(3):706-12. PubMed ID: 26593333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Utilization trends and clinical outcomes in patients implanted with a single- vs a dual-coil implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead: Insights from the ALTITUDE Study.
    Hsu JC; Saxon LA; Jones PW; Wehrenberg S; Marcus GM
    Heart Rhythm; 2015 Aug; 12(8):1770-5. PubMed ID: 25916569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Temporal trends in patient characteristics and outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries undergoing primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator placement in the United States, 2006-2010. Results from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry's Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Registry.
    Borne RT; Peterson PN; Greenlee R; Heidenreich PA; Wang Y; Curtis JP; Tzou WS; Varosy PD; Kremers MS; Masoudi FA
    Circulation; 2014 Sep; 130(10):845-53. PubMed ID: 25095884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical impact, safety, and efficacy of single- versus dual-coil ICD leads in MADIT-CRT.
    Kutyifa V; Huth Ruwald AC; Aktas MK; Jons C; McNitt S; Polonsky B; Geller L; Merkely B; Moss AJ; Zareba W; Bloch Thomsen PE
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2013 Nov; 24(11):1246-52. PubMed ID: 23889863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator selection is associated with increased complication rates and mortality among patients enrolled in the NCDR implantable cardioverter-defibrillator registry.
    Dewland TA; Pellegrini CN; Wang Y; Marcus GM; Keung E; Varosy PD
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2011 Aug; 58(10):1007-13. PubMed ID: 21867834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Laser lead extraction allows for safe and effective removal of single- and dual-coil implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads: A single-centre experience over 12 years.
    Pecha S; Yildirim Y; Gosau N; Aydin MA; Willems S; Treede H; Reichenspurner H; Hakmi S
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2017 Jan; 24(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 27624353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Outcomes with single-coil versus dual-coil implantable cardioverter defibrillators: a meta-analysis.
    Sunderland N; Kaura A; Murgatroyd F; Dhillon P; Scott PA
    Europace; 2018 Mar; 20(3):e21-e29. PubMed ID: 28339860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Single-Coil and Dual-Coil Implantable Defibrillators: A Meta-Analysis.
    Kumar P; Baker M; Gehi AK
    JACC Clin Electrophysiol; 2017 Jan; 3(1):12-19. PubMed ID: 29759689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. No benefit of a dual coil over a single coil ICD lead: evidence from the Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial.
    Aoukar PS; Poole JE; Johnson GW; Anderson J; Hellkamp AS; Mark DB; Lee KL; Bardy GH
    Heart Rhythm; 2013 Jul; 10(7):970-6. PubMed ID: 23562699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Trends in Use of Single- vs Dual-Chamber Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators Among Patients Without a Pacing Indication, 2010-2018.
    Borne RT; Varosy P; Lan Z; Masoudi FA; Curtis JP; Matlock DD; Peterson PN
    JAMA Netw Open; 2022 Mar; 5(3):e223429. PubMed ID: 35315917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Inappropriate Shocks and Other Health Outcomes Between Single- and Dual-Chamber Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators for Primary Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death: Results From the Cardiovascular Research Network Longitudinal Study of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators.
    Peterson PN; Greenlee RT; Go AS; Magid DJ; Cassidy-Bushrow A; Garcia-Montilla R; Glenn KA; Gurwitz JH; Hammill SC; Hayes J; Kadish A; Reynolds K; Sharma P; Smith DH; Varosy PD; Vidaillet H; Zeng CX; Normand ST; Masoudi FA
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2017 Nov; 6(11):. PubMed ID: 29122811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Italian Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Registry. A survey of the national activity during the years 2001-2003.
    Proclemer A; Ghidina M; Cicuttini G; Gregori D; Fioretti PM
    Ital Heart J; 2005 Mar; 6(3):272-80. PubMed ID: 15875520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Characteristics and early clinical outcomes of patients undergoing totally subcutaneous vs. transvenous single chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator placement.
    Mithani AA; Kath H; Hunter K; Andriulli J; Ortman M; Field J; Russo AM
    Europace; 2018 Feb; 20(2):308-314. PubMed ID: 28383717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Trends and In-Hospital Outcomes Associated With Adoption of the Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator in the United States.
    Friedman DJ; Parzynski CS; Varosy PD; Prutkin JM; Patton KK; Mithani A; Russo AM; Curtis JP; Al-Khatib SM
    JAMA Cardiol; 2016 Nov; 1(8):900-911. PubMed ID: 27603935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Defibrillator implantations for primary prevention in the United States: Inappropriate care or inadequate documentation: Insights from the National Cardiovascular Data ICD Registry.
    Kaiser DW; Tsai V; Heidenreich PA; Goldstein MK; Wang Y; Curtis J; Turakhia MP;
    Heart Rhythm; 2015 Oct; 12(10):2086-93. PubMed ID: 25982720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Trends in Use and In-Hospital Outcomes of Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators in Patients Undergoing Long-Term Dialysis.
    Pun PH; Parzynski CS; Friedman DJ; Sanders G; Curtis JP; Al-Khatib SM
    Clin J Am Soc Nephrol; 2020 Nov; 15(11):1622-1630. PubMed ID: 32967922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prevalence, correlates, and temporal trends in antiarrhythmic drug use at discharge after implantable cardioverter defibrillator placement (from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry [NCDR]).
    Dev S; Peterson PN; Wang Y; Curtis JP; Varosy PD; Masoudi FA
    Am J Cardiol; 2014 Jan; 113(2):314-20. PubMed ID: 24216126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Association of the US Department of Justice Investigation of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators and Devices Not Meeting the Medicare National Coverage Determination, 2007-2015.
    Desai NR; Bourdillon PM; Parzynski CS; Brindis RG; Spatz ES; Masters C; Minges KE; Peterson P; Masoudi FA; Oetgen WJ; Buxton A; Zipes DP; Curtis JP
    JAMA; 2018 Jul; 320(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 29971398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Failure rates of single- versus dual-coil nonrecalled sprint quattro defibrillator leads.
    Shariff N; Alluri K; Saba S
    Am J Cardiol; 2015 Jan; 115(2):202-5. PubMed ID: 25465935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.