159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29759782)
21. Usefulness of echocardiographically guided left ventricular lead placement for cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with intermediate QRS width and non-left bundle branch block morphology.
Marek JJ; Saba S; Onishi T; Ryo K; Schwartzman D; Adelstein EC; Gorcsan J
Am J Cardiol; 2014 Jan; 113(1):107-16. PubMed ID: 24169014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Speckle tracking echocardiography analyses of myocardial contraction efficiency predict response for cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Fulati Z; Liu Y; Sun N; Kang Y; Su Y; Chen H; Shu X
Cardiovasc Ultrasound; 2018 Nov; 16(1):30. PubMed ID: 30453975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. New insights from a computational model on the relation between pacing site and CRT response.
Pluijmert M; Bovendeerd PH; Lumens J; Vernooy K; Prinzen FW; Delhaas T
Europace; 2016 Dec; 18(suppl 4):iv94-iv103. PubMed ID: 28011836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Site of latest activation in patients eligible for cardiac resynchronization therapy: patterns of dyssynchrony among different QRS configurations and impact of heart failure etiology.
van Bommel RJ; Ypenburg C; Mollema SA; Borleffs CJ; Delgado V; Bertini M; Marsan NA; van der Wall EE; Schalij MJ; Bax JJ
Am Heart J; 2011 Jun; 161(6):1060-6. PubMed ID: 21641351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Dependency of cardiac resynchronization therapy on myocardial viability at the LV lead position.
Becker M; Zwicker C; Kaminski M; Napp A; Altiok E; Ocklenburg C; Friedman Z; Adam D; Schauerte P; Marx N; Hoffmann R
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Apr; 4(4):366-74. PubMed ID: 21492811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. High-density epicardial activation mapping to optimize the site for video-thoracoscopic left ventricular lead implant.
Polasek R; Skalsky I; Wichterle D; Martinca T; Hanuliakova J; Roubicek T; Bahnik J; Jansova H; Pirk J; Kautzner J
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2014 Aug; 25(8):882-888. PubMed ID: 24724625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Simple regional strain pattern analysis to predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: rationale, initial results, and advantages.
Risum N; Jons C; Olsen NT; Fritz-Hansen T; Bruun NE; Hojgaard MV; Valeur N; Kronborg MB; Kisslo J; Sogaard P
Am Heart J; 2012 Apr; 163(4):697-704. PubMed ID: 22520537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Non-invasive imaging of cardiac electrophysiology in a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator patient with a quadripolar left ventricular lead.
Seger M; Hanser F; Dichtl W; Stuehlinger M; Hintringer F; Trieb T; Pfeifer B; Berger T
Europace; 2014 May; 16(5):743-9. PubMed ID: 24798964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparative long-term outcomes after cardiac resynchronization therapy in right ventricular paced patients versus native wide left bundle branch block patients.
Tayal B; Gorcsan J; Delgado-Montero A; Goda A; Ryo K; Saba S; Risum N; Sogaard P
Heart Rhythm; 2016 Feb; 13(2):511-8. PubMed ID: 26545939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Three-dimensional propagation imaging of left ventricular activation by speckle-tracking echocardiography to predict responses to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Seo Y; Ishizu T; Kawamura R; Yamamoto M; Kuroki K; Igarashi M; Sekiguchi Y; Nogami A; Aonuma K
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2015 May; 28(5):606-14. PubMed ID: 25797706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Characterizing left ventricular mechanical and electrical activation in patients with normal and impaired systolic function using a non-fluoroscopic cardiovascular navigation system.
Piorkowski C; Arya A; Markovitz CD; Razavi H; Jiang C; Rosenberg S; Breithardt OA; Rolf S; John S; Kosiuk J; Huo Y; Döring M; Richter S; Ryu K; Gaspar T; Prinzen FW; Hindricks G; Sommer P
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2018 Apr; 51(3):205-214. PubMed ID: 29388068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Left Ventricular Lead Placement Targeted at the Latest Activated Site Guided by Electrophysiological Mapping in Coronary Sinus Branches Improves Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.
Liang Y; Yu H; Zhou W; Xu G; Sun YI; Liu R; Wang Z; Han Y
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2015 Dec; 26(12):1333-9. PubMed ID: 26249040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Longer right to left ventricular activation delay at cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation is associated with improved clinical outcome in left bundle branch block patients.
Kosztin A; Kutyifa V; Nagy VK; Geller L; Zima E; Molnar L; Szilagyi S; Ozcan EE; Szeplaki G; Merkely B
Europace; 2016 Apr; 18(4):550-9. PubMed ID: 26116830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Incremental Value of Speckle Tracking Echocardiography to Predict Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) Responders.
Seo Y; Ishizu T; Machino-Ohtsuka T; Yamamoto M; Machino T; Kuroki K; Yamasaki H; Sekiguchi Y; Nogami A; Aonuma K
J Am Heart Assoc; 2016 Oct; 5(10):. PubMed ID: 27792652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Impact of left ventricular lead position in cardiac resynchronization therapy on left ventricular remodelling. A circumferential strain analysis based on 2D echocardiography.
Becker M; Kramann R; Franke A; Breithardt OA; Heussen N; Knackstedt C; Stellbrink C; Schauerte P; Kelm M; Hoffmann R
Eur Heart J; 2007 May; 28(10):1211-20. PubMed ID: 17426079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effect of echocardiography-guided left ventricular lead placement for cardiac resynchronization therapy on mortality and risk of defibrillator therapy for ventricular arrhythmias in heart failure patients (from the Speckle Tracking Assisted Resynchronization Therapy for Electrode Region [STARTER] trial).
Adelstein E; Alam MB; Schwartzman D; Jain S; Marek J; Gorcsan J; Saba S
Am J Cardiol; 2014 May; 113(9):1518-22. PubMed ID: 24630387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Simultaneous His Bundle and Left Ventricular Pacing for Optimal Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Delivery: Acute Hemodynamic Assessment by Pressure-Volume Loops.
Padeletti L; Pieragnoli P; Ricciardi G; Innocenti L; Checchi L; Padeletti M; Michelucci A; Picariello F; Valsecchi S
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2016 May; 9(5):. PubMed ID: 27162032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparative mechanical activation mapping of RV pacing to LBBB by 2D and 3D speckle tracking and association with response to resynchronization therapy.
Tanaka H; Hara H; Adelstein EC; Schwartzman D; Saba S; Gorcsan J
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 May; 3(5):461-71. PubMed ID: 20466341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effect of low-amplitude two-dimensional radial strain at left ventricular pacing sites on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Khan FZ; Virdee MS; Read PA; Pugh PJ; O'Halloran D; Fahey M; Elsik M; Begley D; Fynn SP; Dutka DP
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2010 Nov; 23(11):1168-76. PubMed ID: 20888187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The use of multisite left ventricular pacing via quadripolar lead improves acute haemodynamics and mechanical dyssynchrony assessed by radial strain speckle tracking: initial results.
Osca J; Alonso P; Cano O; Andrés A; Miro V; Tello MJ; Olagüe J; Martínez L; Salvador A
Europace; 2016 Apr; 18(4):560-7. PubMed ID: 26333378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
