These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29760892)

  • 1. Effects of female preference intensity on the permissiveness of sexual trait polymorphisms.
    Ponkshe A; Endler JA
    Ecol Evol; 2018 May; 8(9):4518-4524. PubMed ID: 29760892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Joint effects of female preference intensity and frequency-dependent predation on the polymorphism maintenance in aposematic sexual traits.
    Ponkshe A; Endler JA
    Ecol Evol; 2022 Oct; 12(10):e9356. PubMed ID: 36248673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sexual selection and assortative mating: an experimental test.
    Debelle A; Ritchie MG; Snook RR
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Jul; 29(7):1307-16. PubMed ID: 26970522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of sexual selection on trait divergence in a peripheral population with gene flow.
    Servedio MR; Bürger R
    Evolution; 2015 Oct; 69(10):2648-61. PubMed ID: 26332694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mate Choice versus Mate Preference: Inferences about Color-Assortative Mating Differ between Field and Lab Assays of Poison Frog Behavior.
    Yang Y; Blomenkamp S; Dugas MB; Richards-Zawacki CL; Pröhl H
    Am Nat; 2019 Apr; 193(4):598-607. PubMed ID: 30912970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. You can't always get what you want: size assortative mating by mutual mate choice as a resolution of sexual conflict.
    Baldauf SA; Kullmann H; Schroth SH; Thünken T; Bakker TC
    BMC Evol Biol; 2009 Jun; 9():129. PubMed ID: 19515244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. When Do Opposites Attract? A Model Uncovering the Evolution of Disassortative Mating.
    Maisonneuve L; Beneteau T; Joron M; Smadi C; Llaurens V
    Am Nat; 2021 Nov; 198(5):625-641. PubMed ID: 34648401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Runaway sexual selection without genetic correlations: social environments and flexible mate choice initiate and enhance the Fisher process.
    Bailey NW; Moore AJ
    Evolution; 2012 Sep; 66(9):2674-84. PubMed ID: 22946795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does divergent selection predict the evolution of mate preference and reproductive isolation in the tropical butterfly genus Melinaea (Nymphalidae: Ithomiini)?
    McClure M; Mahrouche L; Houssin C; Monllor M; Le Poul Y; Frérot B; Furtos A; Elias M
    J Anim Ecol; 2019 Jun; 88(6):940-952. PubMed ID: 30873614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genetic Coupling of Female Mate Choice with Polygenic Ecological Divergence Facilitates Stickleback Speciation.
    Bay RA; Arnegard ME; Conte GL; Best J; Bedford NL; McCann SR; Dubin ME; Chan YF; Jones FC; Kingsley DM; Schluter D; Peichel CL
    Curr Biol; 2017 Nov; 27(21):3344-3349.e4. PubMed ID: 29056455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of ecology in speciation by sexual selection: a systematic empirical review.
    Scordato ES; Symes LB; Mendelson TC; Safran RJ
    J Hered; 2014; 105 Suppl 1():782-94. PubMed ID: 25149254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. No evidence for size-assortative mating in the wild despite mutual mate choice in sex-role-reversed pipefishes.
    Mobley KB; Abou Chakra M; Jones AG
    Ecol Evol; 2014 Jan; 4(1):67-78. PubMed ID: 24455162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multi-model inference of non-random mating from an information theoretic approach.
    Carvajal-Rodríguez A
    Theor Popul Biol; 2020 Feb; 131():38-53. PubMed ID: 31756362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contemporary sexual selection does not explain variation in male display traits among populations.
    Watts JC; Flynn A; Tenhumberg B; Hebets EA
    Evolution; 2019 Sep; 73(9):1927-1940. PubMed ID: 31343745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Frequency-dependent selection and the evolution of assortative mating.
    Otto SP; Servedio MR; Nuismer SL
    Genetics; 2008 Aug; 179(4):2091-112. PubMed ID: 18660541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Temperature coupling of mate attraction signals and female mate preferences in four populations of Enchenopa treehopper (Hemiptera: Membracidae).
    Jocson DMI; Smeester ME; Leith NT; Macchiano A; Fowler-Finn KD
    J Evol Biol; 2019 Oct; 32(10):1046-1056. PubMed ID: 31278803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diversification under sexual selection: the relative roles of mate preference strength and the degree of divergence in mate preferences.
    Rodríguez RL; Boughman JW; Gray DA; Hebets EA; Höbel G; Symes LB
    Ecol Lett; 2013 Aug; 16(8):964-74. PubMed ID: 23809185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Artificial selection reveals sex differences in the genetic basis of sexual attractiveness.
    Gosden TP; Reddiex AJ; Chenoweth SF
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 May; 115(21):5498-5503. PubMed ID: 29735676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Imprinting sets the stage for speciation.
    Yang Y; Servedio MR; Richards-Zawacki CL
    Nature; 2019 Oct; 574(7776):99-102. PubMed ID: 31578486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Frequency-dependent and correlational selection pressures have conflicting consequences for assortative mating in a color-polymorphic lizard, Uta stansburiana.
    Lancaster LT; McAdam AG; Hipsley CA; Sinervo BR
    Am Nat; 2014 Aug; 184(2):188-97. PubMed ID: 25058279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.