BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29762209)

  • 1. Positive Occluded Patch Test in the Face of Negative Repeat Open Application Test.
    Goldminz AM; Wald MS; Scheinman PL
    Dermatitis; 2018; 29(3):162-163. PubMed ID: 29762209
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical standardization of the TRUE Test formaldehyde patch.
    Fischer T; Andersen K; Bengtsson U; Frosch P; Gunnarsson Y; Kreilgård B; Menné T; Shaw S; Svensson L; Wilkinson J
    Curr Probl Dermatol; 1995; 22():24-30. PubMed ID: 7587329
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical relevance of positive patch test reactions to preservatives and fragrances.
    de Groot AC
    Contact Dermatitis; 1999 Oct; 41(4):224-7. PubMed ID: 10515107
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How to test for fragrance allergy.
    Larsen WG
    Cutis; 2000 Jan; 65(1):39-41. PubMed ID: 10664875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fragrance series testing in eyelid dermatitis.
    Wenk KS; Ehrlich A
    Dermatitis; 2012; 23(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 22653065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Path test reactions to the Chinese Standard Screening Allergens in 1,135 patients investigated for allergic contact dermatitis.
    Liu YQ; Zhao B; Zhuang LH; Fan WX
    Am J Contact Dermat; 1997 Sep; 8(3):141-3. PubMed ID: 9249281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relevance and avoidance of skin-care product allergens: pearls and pitfalls.
    Nelson SA; Yiannias JA
    Dermatol Clin; 2009 Jul; 27(3):329-36, vii. PubMed ID: 19580927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contact Dermatitis, Patch Testing, and Allergen Avoidance.
    Burkemper NM
    Mo Med; 2015; 112(4):296-300. PubMed ID: 26455061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Threshold for occluded formaldehyde patch test in formaldehyde-sensitive patients. Relationship to repeated open application test with a product containing formaldehyde releaser.
    Flyvholm MA; Hall BM; Agner T; Tiedemann E; Greenhill P; Vanderveken W; Freeberg FE; Menné T
    Contact Dermatitis; 1997 Jan; 36(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 9034684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A diagnostic pearl in allergic contact dermatitis to fragrances: the atomizer sign.
    Jacob SE; Castanedo-Tardan MP
    Cutis; 2008 Nov; 82(5):317-8. PubMed ID: 19090333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Contact eczema and allergens: an analysis of the preliminary results of patch tests in the Dermatology Service of the National Hospital and University Center in Cotonou].
    Yedomon HG; Fayomi EB; Do Ango Padonou F; Zohoun T
    Odontostomatol Trop; 1998 Jun; 21(81):19-23. PubMed ID: 11372117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of meteorological conditions on patch test results with 12 standard series allergens (fragrances, biocides, topical ingredients).
    Uter W; Hegewald J; Kränke B; Schnuch A; Gefeller O; Pfahlberg A
    Br J Dermatol; 2008 Apr; 158(4):734-9. PubMed ID: 18284398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Positive patch test reactions to formaldehyde releasers indicating contact allergy to formaldehyde.
    Geier J; Lessmann H; Hellriegel S; Fuchs T
    Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Mar; 58(3):175-7. PubMed ID: 18279163
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Immediate contact reactions to fragrance mix constituents and Myroxylon pereirae resin.
    Tanaka S; Matsumoto Y; Dlova N; Ostlere LS; Goldsmith PC; Rycroft RJ; Basketter DA; White IR; Banerjee P; McFadden JP
    Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Jul; 51(1):20-1. PubMed ID: 15291827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patch test results with the metalworking fluid series of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (DKG).
    Geier J; Lessmann H; Dickel H; Frosch PJ; Koch P; Becker D; Jappe U; Aberer W; Schnuch A; Uter W
    Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Sep; 51(3):118-30. PubMed ID: 15479200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pitfalls in Patch Testing: Minimizing the Risk of Avoidable False-Negative Reactions.
    Ophaug S; Schwarzenberger K
    Dermatol Clin; 2020 Jul; 38(3):293-300. PubMed ID: 32475507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Patch-testing North American lip dermatitis patients: data from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group, 2001 to 2004.
    Zug KA; Kornik R; Belsito DV; DeLeo VA; Fowler JF; Maibach HI; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Rietschel RL; Sasseville D; Storrs FJ; Taylor JS; Warshaw EM;
    Dermatitis; 2008; 19(4):202-8. PubMed ID: 18674455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contact sensitization to fragrances other than fragrance mix I in China.
    Liu J; Li LF
    Contact Dermatitis; 2015 Oct; 73(4):252-3. PubMed ID: 26094488
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. ROAT: morphology of ROAT on arm, neck and face in formaldehyde and diazolidinyl urea sensitive individuals.
    Zachariae C; Hall B; Cupferman S; Andersen KE; Menné T
    Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Jan; 54(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 16426289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patch test reactions to cosmetic allergens in 1995-1997 and 2000-2002 in Finland--a multicentre study.
    Hasan T; Rantanen T; Alanko K; Harvima RJ; Jolanki R; Kalimo K; Lahti A; Lammintausta K; Lauerma AI; Laukkanen A; Luukkaala T; Riekki R; Turjanmaa K; Varjonen E; Vuorela AM
    Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Jul; 53(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 15982231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.