These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29762319)
1. Comparison of Bone Grafts From Various Donor Sites in Human Bone Specimens. Kamal M; Gremse F; Rosenhain S; Bartella AK; Hölzle F; Kessler P; Lethaus B J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Sep; 29(6):1661-1665. PubMed ID: 29762319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Trabecular structure and composition analysis of human autogenous bone donor sites using micro-computed tomography. Imamura E; Mayahara M; Inoue S; Miyamoto M; Funae T; Watanabe Y; Matsuki-Fukushima M; Nakamura M J Oral Biosci; 2021 Mar; 63(1):74-79. PubMed ID: 33486081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Secondary bone grafting of alveolar clefts: a densitometric comparison of iliac crest and tibial bone grafts. Sivarajasingam V; Pell G; Morse M; Shepherd JP Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2001 Jan; 38(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 11204675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Anterior iliac crest, posterior iliac crest, and proximal tibia donor sites: a comparison of cancellous bone volumes in fresh cadavers. Engelstad ME; Morse T J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Dec; 68(12):3015-21. PubMed ID: 20970906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Human trabecular bone microarchitecture can be assessed independently of density with second generation HR-pQCT. Manske SL; Zhu Y; Sandino C; Boyd SK Bone; 2015 Oct; 79():213-21. PubMed ID: 26079995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Gender-related changes in three-dimensional microstructure of trabecular bone at the human proximal tibia with aging. Chen H; Washimi Y; Kubo KY; Onozuka M Histol Histopathol; 2011 May; 26(5):563-70. PubMed ID: 21432771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-dimensional morphometric analysis of human cadaver bone: microstructural data from maxilla and mandible. Fanuscu MI; Chang TL Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Apr; 15(2):213-8. PubMed ID: 15008933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three-dimensional bone structure and bone mineral density evaluations of autogenous bone graft after sinus augmentation: a microcomputed tomography analysis. Huang HL; Chen MY; Hsu JT; Li YF; Chang CH; Chen KT Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Sep; 23(9):1098-103. PubMed ID: 22092756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tibial versus iliac bone grafts: a comparative examination in 15 freshly preserved adult cadavers. Gerressen M; Prescher A; Riediger D; van der Ven D; Ghassemi A Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Dec; 19(12):1270-5. PubMed ID: 19040442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reconstruction of isolated mandibular bone defects with non-vascularized corticocancellous bone autograft and graft viability. Akbay E; Aydogan F Auris Nasus Larynx; 2014 Feb; 41(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 23910898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantity and Quality of Intraoral Autogenous Block Graft Donor Sites with Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Ataman-Duruel ET; Duruel O; Nares S; Stanford C; Tözüm TF Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(4):782-788. PubMed ID: 32724932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The three-dimensional microstructure of the trabecular bone in the mandible. Moon HS; Won YY; Kim KD; Ruprecht A; Kim HJ; Kook HK; Chung MK Surg Radiol Anat; 2004 Dec; 26(6):466-73. PubMed ID: 15146293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Morphometric analysis of the Korean mandibular ramus for distraction osteogenesis using micro-computed tomography. Lee JG; Kim IS; Kim YW; Park JT; Hu KS; Kim HG; Kim HJ J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Jan; 22(1):306-18. PubMed ID: 21239925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Microscopic analysis of reconstructed maxillary alveolar ridges using autogenous bone grafts from the chin and iliac crest. Matsumoto MA; Filho HN; Francischone aE; Consolaro A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(4):507-16. PubMed ID: 12182293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Surgical technique and comparison of autologous cancellous bone grafts from various donor sites in rats. Gens L; Marchionatti E; Steiner A; Stoddart MJ; Thompson K; Mys K; Zeiter S; Constant C J Orthop Res; 2023 Apr; 41(4):834-844. PubMed ID: 35953282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Changes in the volume and density of calvarial split bone grafts after alveolar ridge augmentation. Smolka W; Eggensperger N; Carollo V; Ozdoba C; Iizuka T Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Apr; 17(2):149-55. PubMed ID: 16584410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Volume changes of autogenous bone grafts after alveolar ridge augmentation of atrophic maxillae and mandibles. Sbordone L; Toti P; Menchini-Fabris GB; Sbordone C; Piombino P; Guidetti F Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 38(10):1059-65. PubMed ID: 19632815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bone quality evaluation at dental implant site using multislice CT, micro-CT, and cone beam CT. Parsa A; Ibrahim N; Hassan B; van der Stelt P; Wismeijer D Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015; 26(1):e1-7. PubMed ID: 24325572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of trabecular bone microarchitecture by two different x-ray microcomputed tomographs: a comparative study of the rat distal tibia using Skyscan and Scanco devices. Bonnet N; Laroche N; Vico L; Dolleans E; Courteix D; Benhamou CL Med Phys; 2009 Apr; 36(4):1286-97. PubMed ID: 19472637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative radiologic study of bone density and cortical thickness of donor bone used in mandibular reconstruction. Myoung H; Kim YY; Heo MS; Lee SS; Choi SC; Kim MJ Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Jul; 92(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 11458242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]