These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29762686)

  • 1. Presenting self-monitoring test results for consumers: the effects of graphical formats and age.
    Tao D; Yuan J; Qu X
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2018 Aug; 25(8):1036-1046. PubMed ID: 29762686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of presentation formats on consumers' performance and perceptions in the use of personal health records among older and young adults.
    Tao D; Yuan J; Qu X
    Patient Educ Couns; 2019 Mar; 102(3):578-585. PubMed ID: 30318383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Communicating risk information: the influence of graphical display format on quantitative information perception-Accuracy, comprehension and preferences.
    Price M; Cameron R; Butow P
    Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Dec; 69(1-3):121-8. PubMed ID: 17905553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differences in Memory, Perceptions, and Preferences of Multimedia Consumer Medication Information: Experimental Performance and Self-Report Study.
    Monkman H; Kushniruk AW; Borycki EM; Sheets DJ; Barnett J
    JMIR Hum Factors; 2020 Dec; 7(4):e15913. PubMed ID: 33258780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Absolute risk representation in cardiovascular disease prevention: comprehension and preferences of health care consumers and general practitioners involved in a focus group study.
    Hill S; Spink J; Cadilhac D; Edwards A; Kaufman C; Rogers S; Ryan R; Tonkin A
    BMC Public Health; 2010 Mar; 10():108. PubMed ID: 20199692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Informing patients: the influence of numeracy, framing, and format of side effect information on risk perceptions.
    Peters E; Hart PS; Fraenkel L
    Med Decis Making; 2011; 31(3):432-6. PubMed ID: 21191122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Developing alternative over-the-counter medicine label formats: How do they compare when evaluated by consumers?
    Tong V; Raynor DK; Aslani P
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2018 Mar; 14(3):248-261. PubMed ID: 28546037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contextualizing numeric clinical test results for gist comprehension: Implications for EHR patient portals.
    Morrow D; Azevedo RFL; Garcia-Retamero R; Hasegawa-Johnson M; Huang T; Schuh W; Gu K; Zhang Y
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2019 Mar; 25(1):41-61. PubMed ID: 30688498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tailoring risk communication to improve comprehension: Do patient preferences help or hurt?
    Barnes AJ; Hanoch Y; Miron-Shatz T; Ozanne EM
    Health Psychol; 2016 Sep; 35(9):1007-16. PubMed ID: 27183307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Consumers' interpretation and use of comparative information on the quality of health care: the effect of presentation approaches.
    Damman OC; Hendriks M; Rademakers J; Spreeuwenberg P; Delnoij DM; Groenewegen PP
    Health Expect; 2012 Jun; 15(2):197-211. PubMed ID: 21615637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Communicating quality of care information to physicians: a study of eight presentation formats.
    Geraedts M; Hermeling P; de Cruppé W
    Patient Educ Couns; 2012 Jun; 87(3):375-82. PubMed ID: 22177585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How should risk be communicated to children: a cross-sectional study comparing different formats of probability information.
    Ulph F; Townsend E; Glazebrook C
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2009 Jun; 9():26. PubMed ID: 19500337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual analogies, not graphs, increase patients' comprehension of changes in their health status.
    Reading Turchioe M; Grossman LV; Myers AC; Baik D; Goyal P; Masterson Creber RM
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2020 May; 27(5):677-689. PubMed ID: 31999316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patients' and health professionals' understanding of and preferences for graphical presentation styles for individual-level EORTC QLQ-C30 scores.
    Kuijpers W; Giesinger JM; Zabernigg A; Young T; Friend E; Tomaszewska IM; Aaronson NK; Holzner B
    Qual Life Res; 2016 Mar; 25(3):595-604. PubMed ID: 26353905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of different graphical and numerical likelihood formats on perception of likelihood and choice.
    Oudhoff JP; Timmermans DR
    Med Decis Making; 2015 May; 35(4):487-500. PubMed ID: 25769496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of new multimedia formats for cancer communications.
    Bader JL; Strickman-Stein N
    J Med Internet Res; 2003; 5(3):e16. PubMed ID: 14517107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Graphics help patients distinguish between urgent and non-urgent deviations in laboratory test results.
    Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Scherer AM; Witteman HO; Solomon JB; Exe NL; Tarini BA; Fagerlin A
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2017 May; 24(3):520-528. PubMed ID: 28040686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patient preferences for visualization of longitudinal patient-reported outcomes data.
    Stonbraker S; Porras T; Schnall R
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2020 Feb; 27(2):212-224. PubMed ID: 31670816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comprehension of Internet-based numeric cancer information by older adults.
    Donelle L; Hoffman-Goetz L; Gatobu S; Arocha JF
    Inform Health Soc Care; 2009 Dec; 34(4):209-24. PubMed ID: 19919298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Making comparative performance information more comprehensible: an experimental evaluation of the impact of formats on consumer understanding.
    Damman OC; De Jong A; Hibbard JH; Timmermans DR
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2016 Nov; 25(11):860-869. PubMed ID: 26543066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.