These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29763459)

  • 1. The benefit of combining a deep neural network architecture with ideal ratio mask estimation in computational speech segregation to improve speech intelligibility.
    Bentsen T; May T; Kressner AA; Dau T
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(5):e0196924. PubMed ID: 29763459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A deep learning algorithm to increase intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners in the presence of a competing talker and reverberation.
    Healy EW; Delfarah M; Johnson EM; Wang D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Mar; 145(3):1378. PubMed ID: 31067936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speech intelligibility in background noise with ideal binary time-frequency masking.
    Wang D; Kjems U; Pedersen MS; Boldt JB; Lunner T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Apr; 125(4):2336-47. PubMed ID: 19354408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speech intelligibility in reverberation with ideal binary masking: effects of early reflections and signal-to-noise ratio threshold.
    Roman N; Woodruff J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1707-17. PubMed ID: 23464040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Large-scale training to increase speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners in novel noises.
    Chen J; Wang Y; Yoho SE; Wang D; Healy EW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2604. PubMed ID: 27250154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intelligibility of reverberant noisy speech with ideal binary masking.
    Roman N; Woodruff J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):2153-61. PubMed ID: 21973369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A talker-independent deep learning algorithm to increase intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners in reverberant competing talker conditions.
    Healy EW; Johnson EM; Delfarah M; Wang D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Jun; 147(6):4106. PubMed ID: 32611178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improvement of intelligibility of ideal binary-masked noisy speech by adding background noise.
    Cao S; Li L; Wu X
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Apr; 129(4):2227-36. PubMed ID: 21476677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A classification based approach to speech segregation.
    Han K; Wang D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):3475-83. PubMed ID: 23145627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Influence of Noise Reduction on Speech Intelligibility, Response Times to Speech, and Perceived Listening Effort in Normal-Hearing Listeners.
    van den Tillaart-Haverkate M; de Ronde-Brons I; Dreschler WA; Houben R
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517716844. PubMed ID: 28656807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ideal time-frequency masking algorithms lead to different speech intelligibility and quality in normal-hearing and cochlear implant listeners.
    Koning R; Madhu N; Wouters J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2015 Jan; 62(1):331-41. PubMed ID: 25167542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the sparse coding shrinkage noise reduction algorithm in normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners.
    Sang J; Hu H; Zheng C; Li G; Lutman ME; Bleeck S
    Hear Res; 2014 Apr; 310():36-47. PubMed ID: 24495441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies III: Speech Intelligibility of Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
    Völker C; Warzybok A; Ernst SM
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of the division between early and late reflections on intelligibility of ideal binary-masked speech.
    Li J; Xia R; Fang Q; Li A; Pan J; Yan Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 May; 137(5):2801-10. PubMed ID: 25994708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Role of mask pattern in intelligibility of ideal binary-masked noisy speech.
    Kjems U; Boldt JB; Pedersen MS; Lunner T; Wang D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Sep; 126(3):1415-26. PubMed ID: 19739755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of exploiting spectro-temporal context in computational speech segregation.
    Bentsen T; Kressner AA; Dau T; May T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Jan; 143(1):248. PubMed ID: 29390791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of ideal mask-based speech enhancement algorithms for speech mixed with white noise at low mixture signal-to-noise ratios.
    Graetzer S; Hopkins C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Dec; 152(6):3458. PubMed ID: 36586840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of effects on subjective intelligibility and quality of speech in babble for two algorithms: A deep recurrent neural network and spectral subtraction.
    Keshavarzi M; Goehring T; Turner RE; Moore BCJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Mar; 145(3):1493. PubMed ID: 31067946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bernstein JG; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3358-72. PubMed ID: 19425676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Talker- and language-specific effects on speech intelligibility in noise assessed with bilingual talkers: Which language is more robust against noise and reverberation?
    Hochmuth S; Jürgens T; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():23-34. PubMed ID: 26486466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.