These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29763509)
1. Surgical approach to hysterectomy and barriers to using minimally invasive methods. Janda M; Armfield NR; Kerr G; Kurz S; Jackson G; Currie J; Page K; Weaver E; Yazdani A; Obermair A Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2018 Dec; 58(6):690-695. PubMed ID: 29763509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How to train practising gynaecologists in total laparoscopic hysterectomy: protocol for the stepped-wedge IMAGINE trial. Obermair A; Armfield NR; Graves N; Gebski V; Hanna GB; Coleman MG; Hughes A; Janda M BMJ Open; 2019 May; 9(5):e027155. PubMed ID: 31072858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Impact of Robotic-Assisted Surgery on Training Gynecology Residents. Moola D; Westermann LB; Pauls R; Eschenbacher M; Crisp C Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 26680564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimally invasive hysterectomies-a survey on attitudes and barriers among practicing gynecologists. Einarsson JI; Matteson KA; Schulkin J; Chavan NR; Sangi-Haghpeykar H J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(2):167-75. PubMed ID: 20226403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Inpatient Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in the United States: Trends and Factors Associated With Approach Selection. Desai VB; Guo XM; Fan L; Wright JD; Xu X J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):151-158.e1. PubMed ID: 27614151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Minimally invasive specialists and rates of laparoscopic hysterectomy. Loring M; Morris SN; Isaacson KB JSLS; 2015; 19(1):e2014.00221. PubMed ID: 25848189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Factors influencing the choice of hysterectomy. Shao JB; Wong F Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2001 Aug; 41(3):303-6. PubMed ID: 11592545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Underutilization of vaginal hysterectomy and its impact on residency training. Ocheke AN; Ekwempu CC; Musa J West Afr J Med; 2009; 28(5):323-6. PubMed ID: 20383838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An Assessment of the Continuing Surgical Education Program, a Surgical Preceptor Program for Faculty Members. Cundiff GW; Geoffrion R J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2016 Nov; 38(11):1053-1060. PubMed ID: 27969560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Impact of the LACC study. A SFOG survey]. Gauthier T; Lacorre A; Sallee C; Tardieu A; Guyon F; Margueritte F; Gouy S Bull Cancer; 2020 May; 107(5):551-555. PubMed ID: 32245607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Gynecologists' characteristics associated with the likelihood of performing laparoscopic-assisted hysterectomy: a nationwide population-based study. Huang CC; Wu MP; Huang YT Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Apr; 161(2):209-14. PubMed ID: 22300773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of Minimum-Volume Standards on Patient Outcomes and Surgical Practice Patterns for Hysterectomy. Ruiz MP; Chen L; Hou JY; Tergas AI; St Clair CM; Ananth CV; Neugut AI; Hershman DL; Wright JD Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 132(5):1229-1237. PubMed ID: 30303921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laparoscopic and Robotic-Assisted Hysterectomy for Uterine Leiomyomas: A Comparison of Complications and Costs. Ngan TYT; Zakhari A; Czuzoj-Shulman N; Tulandi T; Abenhaim HA J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2018 Apr; 40(4):432-439. PubMed ID: 29032064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A census of laparoscopic and robotic urological practice: a survey of minimally invasive surgery department of the Brazilian Society of Urology. Rocha MFH; Coelho RF; Branco AW; Filgueira PHO; Guida R Int Braz J Urol; 2019; 45(4):732-738. PubMed ID: 31184455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Role of Minimally Invasive Surgery in Gynecologic Oncology: An Updated Survey of Members of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology. Conrad LB; Ramirez PT; Burke W; Naumann RW; Ring KL; Munsell MF; Frumovitz M Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Jul; 25(6):1121-7. PubMed ID: 25860841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Factors influencing women's decision making in hysterectomy. Janda M; Armfield NR; Page K; Kerr G; Kurz S; Jackson G; Currie J; Weaver E; Yazdani A; Obermair A Patient Educ Couns; 2018 Mar; 101(3):504-510. PubMed ID: 28918105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development and validation of a laparoscopic hysterectomy cuff closure simulation model for surgical training. Tunitsky-Bitton E; Propst K; Muffly T Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 214(3):392.e1-6. PubMed ID: 26640072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Decline in surgeon volume after successful implementation of advanced laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: An undesired side effect? Tummers FHMP; Hoebink J; Driessen SRC; Jansen FW; Twijnstra ARH Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2021 Nov; 100(11):2082-2090. PubMed ID: 34490608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 100 laparoscopic hysterectomies in private practice and visiting professorship programs. Phillips DR; Nathanson HG; Milim SJ; Haselkorn JS J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 1995 Nov; 3(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 9050616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Factors Associated With Hemostatic Agent Use During Laparoscopic Hysterectomy. Kakos A; Allen V; Whiteside J J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(7):1167-1171. PubMed ID: 27590570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]