These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29763509)

  • 41. Laparoscopic Versus Open Hysterectomy for Benign Disease in Uteri Weighing >1 kg: A Retrospective Analysis on 258 Patients.
    Uccella S; Morosi C; Marconi N; Arrigo A; Gisone B; Casarin J; Pinelli C; Borghi C; Ghezzi F
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):62-69. PubMed ID: 28711761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in a university hospital. Decreasing the need for abdominal hysterectomy and increasing resident experience in vaginal surgery.
    Fylstra DL; Carter JF
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Jul; 41(7):497-503. PubMed ID: 8829062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Effect of robotic surgery on hysterectomy trends: implications for resident education.
    Yamasato K; Casey D; Kaneshiro B; Hiraoka M
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(3):399-405. PubMed ID: 24172026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Impact of robotic technology on hysterectomy route and associated implications for resident education.
    Jeppson PC; Rahimi S; Gattoc L; Westermann LB; Cichowski S; Raker C; LeBrun EEW; Sung VW;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):196.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25068556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Versus Vaginal Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Sandberg EM; Twijnstra ARH; Driessen SRC; Jansen FW
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):206-217.e22. PubMed ID: 27867051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Complication Rates and Outcomes After Hysterectomy in Transgender Men.
    Bretschneider CE; Sheyn D; Pollard R; Ferrando CA
    Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 132(5):1265-1273. PubMed ID: 30303922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Considerations to improve the evidence-based use of vaginal hysterectomy in benign gynecology.
    Moen M; Walter A; Harmanli O; Cornella J; Nihira M; Gala R; Zimmerman C; Richter HE;
    Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Sep; 124(3):585-588. PubMed ID: 25162260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Physical Well-Being and Route of Benign Hysterectomy.
    Waldman I; Wagner S; Kulaylat AS; Deimling TA
    Womens Health Issues; 2018; 28(5):456-461. PubMed ID: 30177340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Vaginal route as the norm when planning hysterectomy for benign conditions: change in practice.
    Varma R; Tahseen S; Lokugamage AU; Kunde D
    Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Apr; 97(4):613-6. PubMed ID: 11275037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Multicenter analysis comparing robotic, open, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomies performed by high-volume surgeons for benign indications.
    Lim PC; Crane JT; English EJ; Farnam RW; Garza DM; Winter ML; Rozeboom JL
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Jun; 133(3):359-64. PubMed ID: 26952352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Hysterectomies in Finland in 1990-2012: comparison of outcomes between trainees and specialists.
    Jokinen E; Brummer T; Jalkanen J; Fraser J; Heikkinen AM; Mäkinen J; Sjöberg J; Tomàs E; Mikkola TS; Härkki P
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 Jul; 94(7):701-707. PubMed ID: 25867490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative adverse events in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for the large uterus.
    Bretschneider CE; Frazzini Padilla P; Das D; Jelovsek JE; Unger CA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):490.e1-490.e8. PubMed ID: 30222939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications.
    Swenson CW; Kamdar NS; Harris JA; Uppal S; Campbell DA; Morgan DM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):650.e1-650.e8. PubMed ID: 27343568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Hysterectomy for Uterine Cancer in the Elderly: A Comparison Between Laparoscopic and Robot-Assisted Techniques.
    Zakhari A; Czuzoj-Shulman N; Spence AR; Gotlieb WH; Abenhaim HA
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Sep; 26(7):1222-7. PubMed ID: 27648646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Hysterectomy types in Estonia are still different from the Nordic countries.
    Veerus P; Lang K; Toompere K; Kirss F
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 May; 94(5):489-93. PubMed ID: 25711677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Survey on Barriers to Adoption of Laparoscopic Surgery.
    Fuchs Weizman N; Maurer R; Einarsson JI; Vitonis AF; Cohen SL
    J Surg Educ; 2015; 72(5):985-94. PubMed ID: 26143517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Guidelines to determine the route of hysterectomy.
    Kovac SR
    Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jan; 85(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 7800317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Assessment of Surgical Competence: Development and Validation of Rating Scales Used for Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy.
    Goderstad JM; Sandvik L; Fosse E; Lieng M
    J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(4):600-8. PubMed ID: 26966082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Every woman deserves a high-volume gynecologic surgeon.
    Walter A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 216(2):139.e1-139.e3. PubMed ID: 27780703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Hospitalization and convalescence after hysterectomy. Open or laparoscopic surgery?].
    Møller C; Kehlet H; Ottesen BS
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1999 Aug; 161(33):4620-4. PubMed ID: 10464459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.