These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
417 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29763790)
1. The language of smell: Connecting linguistic and psychophysical properties of odor descriptors. Iatropoulos G; Herman P; Lansner A; Karlgren J; Larsson M; Olofsson JK Cognition; 2018 Sep; 178():37-49. PubMed ID: 29763790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Semantic Organization of the English Odor Vocabulary. Hörberg T; Larsson M; Olofsson JK Cogn Sci; 2022 Nov; 46(11):e13205. PubMed ID: 36334010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Expansive linguistic representations to predict interpretable odor mixture discriminability. Dhurandhar A; Li H; Cecchi GA; Meyer P Chem Senses; 2023 Jan; 48():. PubMed ID: 37262433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Odor-color associations differ with verbal descriptors for odors: A comparison of three linguistically diverse groups. de Valk JM; Wnuk E; Huisman JLA; Majid A Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1171-1179. PubMed ID: 27783225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Human Olfaction at the Intersection of Language, Culture, and Biology. Majid A Trends Cogn Sci; 2021 Feb; 25(2):111-123. PubMed ID: 33349546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A parosmia severity index based on word-classification predicts olfactory abilities and impairment. Hörberg T; Sekine R; Overbeck C; Hummel T; Olofsson JK Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2023 Aug; 280(8):3695-3706. PubMed ID: 36906652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Odor identification errors reveal cognitive aspects of age-associated smell loss. Raj R; Hörberg T; Lindroos R; Larsson M; Herman P; Laukka EJ; Olofsson JK Cognition; 2023 Jul; 236():105445. PubMed ID: 37027897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Psycholinguistic variables matter in odor naming. Huisman JLA; Majid A Mem Cognit; 2018 May; 46(4):577-588. PubMed ID: 29435824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Self-Ratings of Olfactory Performance and Odor Annoyance Are Associated With the Affective Impact of Odor, but Not With Smell Test Results. Knaapila A; Raittola A; Sandell M; Yang B Perception; 2017; 46(3-4):352-365. PubMed ID: 27687812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Revisiting the limits of language: the odor lexicon of Maniq. Wnuk E; Majid A Cognition; 2014 Apr; 131(1):125-38. PubMed ID: 24462926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Data based predictive models for odor perception. Chacko R; Jain D; Patwardhan M; Puri A; Karande S; Rai B Sci Rep; 2020 Oct; 10(1):17136. PubMed ID: 33051564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A systematic review of olfactory related questionnaires and scales. Han P; Su T; Qin M; Chen H; Hummel T Rhinology; 2021 Apr; 59(2):133-143. PubMed ID: 33078172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An Exception to Mental Simulation: No Evidence for Embodied Odor Language. Speed LJ; Majid A Cogn Sci; 2018 May; 42(4):1146-1178. PubMed ID: 29442364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Olfactory language and semantic processing in anosmia: a neuropsychological case control study. Reilly J; Finley AM; Kelly A; Zuckerman B; Flurie M Neurocase; 2021 Feb; 27(1):86-96. PubMed ID: 33400623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predicting natural language descriptions of mono-molecular odorants. Gutiérrez ED; Dhurandhar A; Keller A; Meyer P; Cecchi GA Nat Commun; 2018 Nov; 9(1):4979. PubMed ID: 30478272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The perception of odor is not a surrogate marker for chemical exposure: a review of factors influencing human odor perception. Greenberg MI; Curtis JA; Vearrier D Clin Toxicol (Phila); 2013 Feb; 51(2):70-6. PubMed ID: 23387344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]