329 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29764239)
1. Horizontal sound localisation accuracy in individuals with conductive hearing loss: effect of the bone conduction implant.
Asp F; Reinfeldt S
Int J Audiol; 2018 Sep; 57(9):657-664. PubMed ID: 29764239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Amplification of transcutaneous and percutaneous bone-conduction devices with a test-band in an induced model of conductive hearing loss.
Park MJ; Lee JR; Yang CJ; Yoo MH; Jin IS; Choi CH; Park HJ
Int J Audiol; 2016 Nov; 55(11):653-7. PubMed ID: 27347717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improved directional hearing of children with congenital unilateral conductive hearing loss implanted with an active bone-conduction implant or an active middle ear implant.
Vogt K; Frenzel H; Ausili SA; Hollfelder D; Wollenberg B; Snik AFM; Agterberg MJH
Hear Res; 2018 Dec; 370():238-247. PubMed ID: 30174182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bilateral bone conduction stimulation provides reliable binaural cues for localization.
Snapp H; Vogt K; Agterberg MJH
Hear Res; 2020 Mar; 388():107881. PubMed ID: 31945691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The bone conduction implant: Clinical results of the first six patients.
Reinfeldt S; Håkansson B; Taghavi H; Fredén Jansson KJ; Eeg-Olofsson M
Int J Audiol; 2015 Jun; 54(6):408-16. PubMed ID: 25705995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Contribution of spectral pinna cues for sound localization in children with congenital unilateral conductive hearing loss after hearing rehabilitation.
Vogt K; Wasmann JW; Van Opstal AJ; Snik AFM; Agterberg MJH
Hear Res; 2020 Jan; 385():107847. PubMed ID: 31786443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sound Localization in Patients With Congenital Unilateral Conductive Hearing Loss With a Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Implant.
Vyskocil E; Liepins R; Kaider A; Blineder M; Hamzavi S
Otol Neurotol; 2017 Mar; 38(3):318-324. PubMed ID: 28079678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differing Bilateral Benefits for Spatial Release From Masking and Sound Localization Accuracy Using Bone Conduction Devices.
Denanto FM; Wales J; Tideholm B; Asp F
Ear Hear; 2022 Nov-Dec 01; 43(6):1708-1720. PubMed ID: 35588503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bone-anchored Hearing Aids: correlation between pure-tone thresholds and outcome in three user groups.
Pfiffner F; Kompis M; Stieger C
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Oct; 30(7):884-90. PubMed ID: 19730146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of an active transcutaneous bone conduction device on spatial release from masking.
Rigato C; Reinfeldt S; Asp F
Int J Audiol; 2020 May; 59(5):348-359. PubMed ID: 31873054
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Unilateral and Bilateral Audiological Benefit With an Adhesively Attached, Noninvasive Bone Conduction Hearing System.
Gawliczek T; Munzinger F; Anschuetz L; Caversaccio M; Kompis M; Wimmer W
Otol Neurotol; 2018 Sep; 39(8):1025-1030. PubMed ID: 30015748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparative study of hearing aids and round window application of the vibrant sound bridge (VSB) for patients with mixed or conductive hearing loss.
Marino R; Linton N; Eikelboom RH; Statham E; Rajan GP
Int J Audiol; 2013 Apr; 52(4):209-18. PubMed ID: 23527900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Preliminary functional results and quality of life after implantation of a new bone conduction hearing device in patients with conductive and mixed hearing loss.
Ihler F; Volbers L; Blum J; Matthias C; Canis M
Otol Neurotol; 2014 Feb; 35(2):211-5. PubMed ID: 24448279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-Term Outcomes of Vibroplasty Coupler Implantations to Treat Mixed/Conductive Hearing Loss.
Zahnert T; Mlynski R; Löwenheim H; Beutner D; Hagen R; Ernst A; Zehlicke T; Kühne H; Friese N; Tropitzsch A; Luers JC; Todt I; Hüttenbrink KB
Audiol Neurootol; 2018; 23(6):316-325. PubMed ID: 30650421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does hearing in response to soft-tissue stimulation involve skull vibrations? A within-subject comparison between skull vibration magnitudes and hearing thresholds.
Chordekar S; Perez R; Adelman C; Sohmer H; Kishon-Rabin L
Hear Res; 2018 Jul; 364():59-67. PubMed ID: 29678325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sound-localisation performance in patients with congenital unilateral microtia and atresia fitted with an active middle ear implant.
Zhao C; Liu Y; Yang J; Chen P; Gao M; Zhao S
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Jan; 278(1):31-39. PubMed ID: 32449028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improvement of speech perception in quiet and in noise without decreasing localization abilities with the bone conduction device Bonebridge.
Weiss R; Leinung M; Baumann U; Weißgerber T; Rader T; Stöver T
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 May; 274(5):2107-2115. PubMed ID: 28032241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Objective and subjective results of the Bonebridge transcutaneous active direct-drive bone conduction hearing implant.
Alzhrani F
Saudi Med J; 2019 Aug; 40(8):797-801. PubMed ID: 31423516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Outcomes after Application of Active Bone Conducting Implants.
Koro E; Werner M
Audiol Neurootol; 2019; 24(4):197-205. PubMed ID: 31499490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Simultaneous bilateral transcutaneous bone conduction device implantation: sound localisation and speech perception in children with bilateral conductive hearing loss.
Chen P; Yang L; Yang J; Wang D; Li Y; Zhao C; Liu Y; Gao M; Zhu J; Li S; Zhao S
J Laryngol Otol; 2022 Oct; 136(10):939-946. PubMed ID: 35570567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
