These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29764252)

  • 1. Response properties of the human frequency-following response (FFR) to speech and non-speech sounds: level dependence, adaptation and phase-locking limits.
    Bidelman G; Powers L
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Sep; 57(9):665-672. PubMed ID: 29764252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Aging degrades the neural encoding of simple and complex sounds in the human brainstem.
    Clinard CG; Tremblay KL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(7):590-9; quiz 643-4. PubMed ID: 24047946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Frequency-dependent fine structure in the frequency-following response: The byproduct of multiple generators.
    Tichko P; Skoe E
    Hear Res; 2017 May; 348():1-15. PubMed ID: 28137699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Subcortical sources dominate the neuroelectric auditory frequency-following response to speech.
    Bidelman GM
    Neuroimage; 2018 Jul; 175():56-69. PubMed ID: 29604459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multichannel recordings of the human brainstem frequency-following response: scalp topography, source generators, and distinctions from the transient ABR.
    Bidelman GM
    Hear Res; 2015 May; 323():68-80. PubMed ID: 25660195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Subcortical rather than cortical sources of the frequency-following response (FFR) relate to speech-in-noise perception in normal-hearing listeners.
    Bidelman GM; Momtaz S
    Neurosci Lett; 2021 Feb; 746():135664. PubMed ID: 33497718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Correlation between the frequency difference limen and an index based on principal component analysis of the frequency-following response of normal hearing listeners.
    Zhang X; Gong Q
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():255-264. PubMed ID: 27956352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Enhanced brainstem phase-locking in low-level noise reveals stochastic resonance in the frequency-following response (FFR).
    Shukla B; Bidelman GM
    Brain Res; 2021 Nov; 1771():147643. PubMed ID: 34473999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electrocochleographic frequency-following responses as a potential marker of age-related cochlear neural degeneration.
    Temboury-Gutierrez M; Märcher-Rørsted J; Bille M; Yde J; Encina-Llamas G; Hjortkjær J; Dau T
    Hear Res; 2024 May; 446():109005. PubMed ID: 38598943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differences between auditory frequency-following responses and onset responses: Intracranial evidence from rat inferior colliculus.
    Wang Q; Li L
    Hear Res; 2018 Jan; 357():25-32. PubMed ID: 29156225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Human frequency-following responses: representation of steady-state synthetic vowels.
    Krishnan A
    Hear Res; 2002 Apr; 166(1-2):192-201. PubMed ID: 12062771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Human Frequency Following Responses to Vocoded Speech.
    Ananthakrishnan S; Luo X; Krishnan A
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e256-e267. PubMed ID: 28362674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Human Frequency Following Response: Neural Representation of Envelope and Temporal Fine Structure in Listeners with Normal Hearing and Sensorineural Hearing Loss.
    Ananthakrishnan S; Krishnan A; Bartlett E
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(2):e91-e103. PubMed ID: 26583482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cross-correlation and latency compensation analysis of click-evoked and frequency-following brain-stem responses in man.
    Galbraith GC; Brown WS
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1990; 77(4):295-308. PubMed ID: 1695141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Brainstem correlates of concurrent speech identification in adverse listening conditions.
    Yellamsetty A; Bidelman GM
    Brain Res; 2019 Jul; 1714():182-192. PubMed ID: 30796895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Early maturation of frequency-following responses to voice pitch in infants with normal hearing.
    Jeng FC; Schnabel EA; Dickman BM; Hu J; Li X; Lin CD; Chung HK
    Percept Mot Skills; 2010 Dec; 111(3):765-84. PubMed ID: 21319616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Recording the human brainstem frequency-following-response in the free-field.
    Gama N; Peretz I; Lehmann A
    J Neurosci Methods; 2017 Mar; 280():47-53. PubMed ID: 28185890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Changes in pitch height elicit both language-universal and language-dependent changes in neural representation of pitch in the brainstem and auditory cortex.
    Krishnan A; Suresh CH; Gandour JT
    Neuroscience; 2017 Mar; 346():52-63. PubMed ID: 28108254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Brainstem correlates of cochlear nonlinearity measured via the scalp-recorded frequency-following response.
    Bidelman GM; Bhagat S
    Neuroreport; 2020 Jul; 31(10):702-707. PubMed ID: 32453027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.