248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29764252)
1. Response properties of the human frequency-following response (FFR) to speech and non-speech sounds: level dependence, adaptation and phase-locking limits.
Bidelman G; Powers L
Int J Audiol; 2018 Sep; 57(9):665-672. PubMed ID: 29764252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Aging degrades the neural encoding of simple and complex sounds in the human brainstem.
Clinard CG; Tremblay KL
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(7):590-9; quiz 643-4. PubMed ID: 24047946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Frequency-dependent fine structure in the frequency-following response: The byproduct of multiple generators.
Tichko P; Skoe E
Hear Res; 2017 May; 348():1-15. PubMed ID: 28137699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Subcortical sources dominate the neuroelectric auditory frequency-following response to speech.
Bidelman GM
Neuroimage; 2018 Jul; 175():56-69. PubMed ID: 29604459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multichannel recordings of the human brainstem frequency-following response: scalp topography, source generators, and distinctions from the transient ABR.
Bidelman GM
Hear Res; 2015 May; 323():68-80. PubMed ID: 25660195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Subcortical rather than cortical sources of the frequency-following response (FFR) relate to speech-in-noise perception in normal-hearing listeners.
Bidelman GM; Momtaz S
Neurosci Lett; 2021 Feb; 746():135664. PubMed ID: 33497718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correlation between the frequency difference limen and an index based on principal component analysis of the frequency-following response of normal hearing listeners.
Zhang X; Gong Q
Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():255-264. PubMed ID: 27956352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Enhanced brainstem phase-locking in low-level noise reveals stochastic resonance in the frequency-following response (FFR).
Shukla B; Bidelman GM
Brain Res; 2021 Nov; 1771():147643. PubMed ID: 34473999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Electrocochleographic frequency-following responses as a potential marker of age-related cochlear neural degeneration.
Temboury-Gutierrez M; Märcher-Rørsted J; Bille M; Yde J; Encina-Llamas G; Hjortkjær J; Dau T
Hear Res; 2024 May; 446():109005. PubMed ID: 38598943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Differences between auditory frequency-following responses and onset responses: Intracranial evidence from rat inferior colliculus.
Wang Q; Li L
Hear Res; 2018 Jan; 357():25-32. PubMed ID: 29156225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Human frequency-following responses: representation of steady-state synthetic vowels.
Krishnan A
Hear Res; 2002 Apr; 166(1-2):192-201. PubMed ID: 12062771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Human Frequency Following Responses to Vocoded Speech.
Ananthakrishnan S; Luo X; Krishnan A
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e256-e267. PubMed ID: 28362674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Human Frequency Following Response: Neural Representation of Envelope and Temporal Fine Structure in Listeners with Normal Hearing and Sensorineural Hearing Loss.
Ananthakrishnan S; Krishnan A; Bartlett E
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(2):e91-e103. PubMed ID: 26583482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cross-correlation and latency compensation analysis of click-evoked and frequency-following brain-stem responses in man.
Galbraith GC; Brown WS
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1990; 77(4):295-308. PubMed ID: 1695141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Brainstem correlates of concurrent speech identification in adverse listening conditions.
Yellamsetty A; Bidelman GM
Brain Res; 2019 Jul; 1714():182-192. PubMed ID: 30796895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Early maturation of frequency-following responses to voice pitch in infants with normal hearing.
Jeng FC; Schnabel EA; Dickman BM; Hu J; Li X; Lin CD; Chung HK
Percept Mot Skills; 2010 Dec; 111(3):765-84. PubMed ID: 21319616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Recording the human brainstem frequency-following-response in the free-field.
Gama N; Peretz I; Lehmann A
J Neurosci Methods; 2017 Mar; 280():47-53. PubMed ID: 28185890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Changes in pitch height elicit both language-universal and language-dependent changes in neural representation of pitch in the brainstem and auditory cortex.
Krishnan A; Suresh CH; Gandour JT
Neuroscience; 2017 Mar; 346():52-63. PubMed ID: 28108254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Brainstem correlates of cochlear nonlinearity measured via the scalp-recorded frequency-following response.
Bidelman GM; Bhagat S
Neuroreport; 2020 Jul; 31(10):702-707. PubMed ID: 32453027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
