These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29764252)
21. The frequency-following response to continuous tones in humans. Batra R; Kuwada S; Maher VL Hear Res; 1986; 21(2):167-77. PubMed ID: 3700255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Noise and pitch interact during the cortical segregation of concurrent speech. Bidelman GM; Yellamsetty A Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():34-44. PubMed ID: 28578876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Human Frequency Following Responses to Filtered Speech. Ananthakrishnan S; Grinstead L; Yurjevich D Ear Hear; 2021; 42(1):87-105. PubMed ID: 33369591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effects of congenital blindness on the subcortical representation of speech cues. Jafari Z; Malayeri S Neuroscience; 2014 Jan; 258():401-9. PubMed ID: 24291729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Dichotic phase effects on frequency following responses reveal phase variant and invariant harmonic distortion products. Gnanateja GN; Maruthy S Hear Res; 2019 Sep; 380():84-99. PubMed ID: 31212114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Neural temporal coding of low pitch. I. Human frequency-following responses to complex tones. Greenberg S; Marsh JT; Brown WS; Smith JC Hear Res; 1987; 25(2-3):91-114. PubMed ID: 3558136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation of two algorithms for detecting human frequency-following responses to voice pitch. Jeng FC; Hu J; Dickman B; Lin CY; Lin CD; Wang CY; Chung HK; Li X Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 21047294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Speech frequency-following response in human auditory cortex is more than a simple tracking. Guo N; Si X; Zhang Y; Ding Y; Zhou W; Zhang D; Hong B Neuroimage; 2021 Feb; 226():117545. PubMed ID: 33186711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effects of stimulus presentation mode and subcortical laterality in speech-evoked auditory brainstem responses. Ahadi M; Pourbakht A; Jafari AH; Jalaie S Int J Audiol; 2014 Apr; 53(4):243-9. PubMed ID: 24506562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Objective information-theoretic algorithm for detecting brainstem-evoked responses to complex stimuli. Bidelman GM J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Sep; 25(8):715-26. PubMed ID: 25380118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Brainstem-cortical functional connectivity for speech is differentially challenged by noise and reverberation. Bidelman GM; Davis MK; Pridgen MH Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():149-160. PubMed ID: 29871826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Self-masking and overlap-masking from reverberation using the speech-evoked auditory brainstem response. Al Osman R; Dajani HR; Giguère C J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Dec; 142(6):EL555. PubMed ID: 29289064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Test-Retest Reliability of Dual-Recorded Brainstem versus Cortical Auditory-Evoked Potentials to Speech. Bidelman GM; Pousson M; Dugas C; Fehrenbach A J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Feb; 29(2):164-174. PubMed ID: 29401063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Stimulus rate and subcortical auditory processing of speech. Krizman JL; Skoe E; Kraus N Audiol Neurootol; 2010; 15(5):332-42. PubMed ID: 20215743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Noise tolerance in human frequency-following responses to voice pitch. Li X; Jeng FC J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jan; 129(1):EL21-6. PubMed ID: 21302977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effects of lifetime noise exposure on the middle-age human auditory brainstem response, tinnitus and speech-in-noise intelligibility. Valderrama JT; Beach EF; Yeend I; Sharma M; Van Dun B; Dillon H Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():36-48. PubMed ID: 29913342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Testing native language neural commitment at the brainstem level: A cross-linguistic investigation of the association between frequency-following response and speech perception. Yu L; Zhang Y Neuropsychologia; 2018 Jan; 109():140-148. PubMed ID: 29246484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Aging effects on the neural representation and perception of consonant transition cues. Poe AA; Karawani H; Anderson S Hear Res; 2024 Jul; 448():109034. PubMed ID: 38781768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. High gamma cortical processing of continuous speech in younger and older listeners. Kulasingham JP; Brodbeck C; Presacco A; Kuchinsky SE; Anderson S; Simon JZ Neuroimage; 2020 Nov; 222():117291. PubMed ID: 32835821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]