140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29765658)
1. Nest size is predicted by female identity and the local environment in the blue tit (
O'Neill LG; Parker TH; Griffith SC
R Soc Open Sci; 2018 Apr; 5(4):172036. PubMed ID: 29765658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intraspecific variation and interspecific differences in the bacterial and fungal assemblages of blue tit (Cyanistes caeruleus) and great tit (Parus major) nests.
Goodenough AE; Stallwood B
Microb Ecol; 2010 Feb; 59(2):221-32. PubMed ID: 19830477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Experimental evidence for state-dependent nest weight in the blue tit, Cyanistes caeruleus.
Mainwaring MC; Hartley IR
Behav Processes; 2009 May; 81(1):144-6. PubMed ID: 19429209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lining the nest with more feathers increases offspring recruitment probability: Selection on an extended phenotype in the blue tit.
Järvinen P; Brommer JE
Ecol Evol; 2020 Dec; 10(23):13327-13333. PubMed ID: 33304540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of interspecific coexistence on laying date and clutch size in two closely related species of hole-nesting birds.
Møller AP; Balbontín J; Dhondt AA; Remeš V; Adriaensen F; Biard C; Camprodon J; Cichoń M; Doligez B; Dubiec A; Eens M; Eeva T; Goodenough AE; Gosler AG; Gustafsson L; Heeb P; Hinsley SA; Jacob S; Juškaitis R; Laaksonen T; Leclercq B; Massa B; Mazgajski TD; Nager RG; Nilsson JÅ; Nilsson SG; Norte AC; Pinxten R; Robles H; Solonen T; Sorace A; van Noordwijk AJ; Lambrechts MM
J Anim Ecol; 2018 Nov; 87(6):1738-1748. PubMed ID: 30101503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Population genetic structure of the tree-hole tick Ixodes arboricola (Acari: Ixodidae) at different spatial scales.
Van Oosten AR; Heylen DJ; Jordaens K; Backeljau T; Matthysen E
Heredity (Edinb); 2014 Nov; 113(5):408-15. PubMed ID: 24781806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of nest-box environment on fledgling success rate and pathogen load.
Scott-Baumann JF; Morgan ER; Cogan TA
Parasitology; 2022 Aug; 149(9):1186-1192. PubMed ID: 35570692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Habitat-dependent
Garrido-Bautista J; Martínez-de la Puente J; Ros-Santaella JL; Pintus E; Lopezosa P; Bernardo N; Comas M; Moreno-Rueda G
Parasitology; 2022 Jul; 149(8):1119-1128. PubMed ID: 35570671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Local individual preferences for nest materials in a passerine bird.
Mennerat A; Perret P; Lambrechts MM
PLoS One; 2009; 4(4):e5104. PubMed ID: 19337365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Nest decoration: birds exploit a fear of feathers to guard their nest from usurpation.
Slagsvold T; Wiebe KL
R Soc Open Sci; 2021 Nov; 8(11):211579. PubMed ID: 34804584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Low heritability of nest construction in a wild bird.
Järvinen P; Kluen E; Brommer JE
Biol Lett; 2017 Oct; 13(10):. PubMed ID: 29046371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Nest design in a changing world: great tit
Lambrechts MM; Charmantier A; Demeyrier V; Lucas A; Perret S; Abouladzé M; Bonnet M; Canonne C; Faucon V; Grosset S; le Prado G; Lidon F; Noell T; Pagano P; Perret V; Pouplard S; Spitaliéry R; Bernard C; Perret P; Blondel J; Grégoire A
Urban Ecosyst; 2017 Dec; 20(6):1181-1190. PubMed ID: 29230087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Blue tits (Cyanistes caeruleus) respond to an experimental change in the aromatic plant odour composition of their nest.
Mennerat A
Behav Processes; 2008 Nov; 79(3):189-91. PubMed ID: 18692552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Phenotypic consequences of maternally selected nests: a cross-fostering experiment in a desert lizard.
Li S; Hao X; Sun B; Bi J; Zhang Y; DU W
Integr Zool; 2021 Sep; 16(5):741-754. PubMed ID: 33190392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sex-specific heritability of cell-mediated immune response in the blue tit nestlings (Cyanistes caeruleus).
Drobniak SM; Wiejaczka D; Arct A; Dubiec A; Gustafsson L; Cichoń M
J Evol Biol; 2010 Jun; 23(6):1286-92. PubMed ID: 20456564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The environmental predictors of spatio-temporal variation in the breeding phenology of a passerine bird.
Shutt JD; Cabello IB; Keogan K; Leech DI; Samplonius JM; Whittle L; Burgess MD; Phillimore AB
Proc Biol Sci; 2019 Aug; 286(1908):20190952. PubMed ID: 31409248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of ambient temperature, habitat quality and individual age on incubation behaviour and incubation feeding in a socially monogamous songbird.
Amininasab SM; Kingma SA; Birker M; Hildenbrandt H; Komdeur J
Behav Ecol Sociobiol; 2016; 70():1591-1600. PubMed ID: 27546954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Nest building in titmice Paridae: Selectivity in bryophyte use.
Rydgren K; Indreeide B; Slagsvold T; Lampe HM
Ecol Evol; 2023 Mar; 13(3):e9852. PubMed ID: 36911310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Weather and nest cavity characteristics influence fecundity in mountain chickadees.
Norris AR; Martin K; Cockle KL
PeerJ; 2022; 10():e14327. PubMed ID: 36389406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pollution-related changes in nest microbiota: Implications for growth and fledging in three passerine birds.
Leino LI; Vesterinen EJ; Sánchez-Virosta P; Puigbò P; Eeva T; Rainio MJ
Environ Pollut; 2024 Jun; 357():124434. PubMed ID: 38936789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
