162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2976578)
1. Skin notation in the context of workplace exposure standards.
Scansetti G; Piolatto G; Rubino GF
Am J Ind Med; 1988; 14(6):725-32. PubMed ID: 2976578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of indices proposed as criteria for assigning skin notation.
Lavoué J; Milon A; Droz PO
Ann Occup Hyg; 2008 Nov; 52(8):747-56. PubMed ID: 18687973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The nature and significance of the corporate influence on threshold limit values.
Morton WE
Am J Ind Med; 1988; 14(6):721-3. PubMed ID: 3232689
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Dermal absorption potential of industrial chemicals: criteria for skin notation.
Fiserova-Bergerova V; Pierce JT; Droz PO
Am J Ind Med; 1990; 17(5):617-35. PubMed ID: 2337085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The skin notation in the MAC list and classification of dangerous chemicals.
Kupczewska-Dobecka M; Czerczak S
Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2006; 19(2):84-91. PubMed ID: 17128805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assignment of skin notation for maximum allowable concentration (MAC) list in Poland.
Czerczak S; Kupczewska M
Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2002 Mar; 17(3):187-99. PubMed ID: 11871755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dermal exposure assessment in occupational medicine.
Sartorelli P
Occup Med (Lond); 2002 May; 52(3):151-6. PubMed ID: 12063360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Implications for the use of TLVs to clinical occupational medicine practice.
Cullen MR
Am J Ind Med; 1991; 19(5):679-80. PubMed ID: 2053583
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Upgrading occupational epidemiology and standard setting by improved exposure monitoring.
Vanhoorne M
Am J Ind Med; 1988; 14(6):733-4. PubMed ID: 3232690
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. But they are not thresholds: a critical analysis of the documentation of Threshold Limit Values.
Roach SA; Rappaport SM
Am J Ind Med; 1990; 17(6):727-53. PubMed ID: 2188503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Strategy of biological monitoring and setting of biological threshold limits (BAT values) in Germany.
Lehnert G; Schaller KH
Isr J Med Sci; 1995 Sep; 31(9):549-57. PubMed ID: 7558779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Comparative study on occupational exposure limits of chemical substances in workplace between GBZ 2.1 in China and ACGIH in USA].
Li W; Zhang M; Wang D
Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2014 Jan; 32(1):1-26. PubMed ID: 24428986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Threshold limit values: historical perspectives and current practice.
Ziem GE; Castleman BI
J Occup Med; 1989 Nov; 31(11):910-8. PubMed ID: 2681586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The relationship between TLV-TWA compliance and TLV-STEL compliance.
Tuggle RM
Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2000 Apr; 15(4):380-6. PubMed ID: 10750282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The origin and basis of threshold limit values.
Paull JM
Am J Ind Med; 1984; 5(3):227-38. PubMed ID: 6702827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Response to "Corporate Influence on Threshold Limit Values".
Elkins HB
Am J Ind Med; 1988; 14(6):737-40. PubMed ID: 3232691
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Biological exposure index as a complement to the TLV.
Lowry LK
J Occup Med; 1986 Aug; 28(8):578-82. PubMed ID: 3746477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The contribution of acute toxicity in animals to occupational exposure limits of chemical substances.
Suda M; Tsuruta H; Honma T
Ind Health; 1999 Jan; 37(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 10052296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Criteria for skin notation in different countries.
Nielsen JB; Grandjean P
Am J Ind Med; 2004 Mar; 45(3):275-80. PubMed ID: 14991854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomonitoring and occupational medicine. Possibilities and limitations.
Angerer J; Gündel J
Ann Ist Super Sanita; 1996; 32(2):199-206. PubMed ID: 8913036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
