These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2976578)

  • 21. Dermal exposure to chemicals in the workplace: just how important is skin absorption?
    Semple S
    Occup Environ Med; 2004 Apr; 61(4):376-82. PubMed ID: 15031402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Dermal exposure assessment techniques.
    Fenske RA
    Ann Occup Hyg; 1993 Dec; 37(6):687-706. PubMed ID: 8304685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effects of temperature and pressure on airborne exposure concentrations when performing compliance evaluations using ACGIH TLVs and OSHA PELs.
    Stephenson DJ; Lillquist DR
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2001 Apr; 16(4):482-6. PubMed ID: 11318391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation and application of the RD50 for determining acceptable exposure levels of airborne sensory irritants for the general public.
    Kuwabara Y; Alexeeff GV; Broadwin R; Salmon AG
    Environ Health Perspect; 2007 Nov; 115(11):1609-16. PubMed ID: 18007993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A Web-based Tool to Aid the Identification of Chemicals Potentially Posing a Health Risk through Percutaneous Exposure.
    Gorman Ng M; Milon A; Vernez D; Lavoué J
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2016 Apr; 60(3):276-89. PubMed ID: 26721263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Standards for the control of carcinogens in the workplace.
    Rose VE
    J Occup Med; 1976 Feb; 18(2):81-4. PubMed ID: 1249665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Biological monitoring and Biological Limit Values (BLV): the strategy of the European Union.
    Bolt HM; Thier R
    Toxicol Lett; 2006 Apr; 162(2-3):119-24. PubMed ID: 16326051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Proposal for the assessment of quantitative dermal exposure limits in occupational environments: Part 1. Development of a concept to derive a quantitative dermal occupational exposure limit.
    Bos PM; Brouwer DH; Stevenson H; Boogaard PJ; de Kort WL; van Hemmen JJ
    Occup Environ Med; 1998 Dec; 55(12):795-804. PubMed ID: 9924440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dermal route in systemic exposure.
    Benford DJ; Cocker J; Sartorelli P; Schneider T; van Hemmen J; Firth JG
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 1999 Dec; 25(6):511-20. PubMed ID: 10884147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Identifying an apppropriate occupational exposure limit (OEL) for beryllium: data gaps and current research initiatives.
    Paustenbach DJ; Madl AK; Greene JF
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2001 May; 16(5):527-38. PubMed ID: 11370933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Assignment of skin notation for MAK values and its legal consequences in Germany.
    Drexler H
    Int Arch Occup Environ Health; 1998 Oct; 71(7):503-5. PubMed ID: 9826085
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The 2008 ICOH Workshop on Skin Notation.
    Sartorelli P; Ahlers HW; Cherrie JW; Kezic S; Johanson G; Filon FL; Nielsen JB; Shepherd A; Stull J; Williams F
    Med Lav; 2010; 101(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 20415043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Methods for assessing risks of dermal exposures in the workplace.
    McDougal JN; Boeniger MF
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2002 Jul; 32(4):291-327. PubMed ID: 12184506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A quantitative analysis of factors affecting PELs and TLVs for carcinogens.
    Smith JS; Mendeloff JM
    Risk Anal; 1999 Dec; 19(6):1223-34. PubMed ID: 10765459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The nonuniform application of TLV's as legal workplace standards.
    Stock TH
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1980 Mar; 41(3):226-8. PubMed ID: 7395735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The development of hygiene standards.
    Turner D
    Ann Occup Hyg; 1976 Nov; 19(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 1008408
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Complex mixtures in industrial workspaces: lessons for indoor air quality evaluations.
    Lippy BE; Turner RW
    Environ Health Perspect; 1991 Nov; 95():81-3. PubMed ID: 1821384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Use of dermal LD(50) as a criterion for skin notation.
    Chen CP; Boeniger MF; Ahlers HW
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2003 Mar; 18(3):154-5; author reply 156-7. PubMed ID: 12573958
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Development of workplace environment standards in foreign countries. Pt 3.--Procedures for Development of MAC values in the USSR.
    Dinman BD
    J Occup Med; 1976 Aug; 18(8):556-60. PubMed ID: 956941
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Should control measures be based on air measurements or biological/biological effect monitoring?
    Harrison J; Sepai O
    Occup Med (Lond); 2000 Jan; 50(1):61-3. PubMed ID: 10795396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.