266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29766319)
1. Surgical margin status and its impact on prostate cancer prognosis after radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis.
Zhang L; Wu B; Zha Z; Zhao H; Yuan J; Jiang Y; Yang W
World J Urol; 2018 Nov; 36(11):1803-1815. PubMed ID: 29766319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Positive surgical margin is associated with biochemical recurrence risk following radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis from high-quality retrospective cohort studies.
Zhang L; Wu B; Zha Z; Zhao H; Jiang Y; Yuan J
World J Surg Oncol; 2018 Jul; 16(1):124. PubMed ID: 29970100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-term oncological outcomes of apical positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy in the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital cohort.
Wadhwa H; Terris MK; Aronson WJ; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Cooperberg MR; Freedland SJ; Abern MR
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2016 Dec; 19(4):423-428. PubMed ID: 27698440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Significant reduction in positive surgical margin rate after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy by application of the modified surgical margin recommendations of the 2009 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus.
Maxeiner A; Magheli A; Jöhrens K; Kilic E; Braun TL; Kempkensteffen C; Hinz S; Stephan C; Miller K; Busch J
BJU Int; 2016 Nov; 118(5):750-757. PubMed ID: 26915345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing the Impact of Positive Surgical Margins on Mortality in Patients Who Underwent Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: 20 Years' Report from the EAU Robotic Urology Section Scientific Working Group.
Pellegrino F; Falagario UG; Knipper S; Martini A; Akre O; Egevad L; Aly M; Moschovas MC; Bravi CA; Tran J; Heiniger Y; von Kempis A; Schaffar R; Carrieri G; Briganti A; Montorsi F; Rochat CH; Mottrie A; Ahlering TE; John H; Patel V; Graefen M; Wiklund P;
Eur Urol Oncol; 2023 Dec; ():. PubMed ID: 38155061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of Multifocality and Multilocation of Positive Surgical Margin After Radical Prostatectomy on Predicting Oncological Outcome.
Wu S; Lin SX; Wirth GJ; Lu M; Lu J; Subtelny AO; Wang Z; Dahl DM; Olumi AF; Wu CL
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2019 Feb; 17(1):e44-e52. PubMed ID: 30287224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. First Danish single-institution experience with radical prostatectomy: impact of surgical margins on biochemical outcome.
Vrang ML; Røder MA; Vainer B; Christensen IJ; Gruschy L; Brasso K; Iversen P
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2012 Jun; 46(3):172-9. PubMed ID: 22320899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radical prostatectomy and the effect of close surgical margins: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) database.
Herforth C; Stroup SP; Chen Z; Howard LE; Freedland SJ; Moreira DM; Terris MK; Aronson WJ; Cooperberg MR; Amling CL; Kane CJ
BJU Int; 2018 Oct; 122(4):592-598. PubMed ID: 29473992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Defining Clinically Meaningful Positive Surgical Margins in Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy for Localised Prostate Cancer.
Martini A; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Scuderi S; Bravi CA; Mazzone E; Stabile A; Scarcella S; Robesti D; Barletta F; Cucchiara V; Mirone V; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Feb; 4(1):42-48. PubMed ID: 31411971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Population-based determinants of radical prostatectomy surgical margin positivity.
Williams SB; D'Amico AV; Weinberg AC; Gu X; Lipsitz SR; Hu JC
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1734-40. PubMed ID: 20942827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: do they have an impact on biochemical or clinical progression?
Pfitzenmaier J; Pahernik S; Tremmel T; Haferkamp A; Buse S; Hohenfellner M
BJU Int; 2008 Nov; 102(10):1413-8. PubMed ID: 18537951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Do margins matter? The influence of positive surgical margins on prostate cancer-specific mortality.
Stephenson AJ; Eggener SE; Hernandez AV; Klein EA; Kattan MW; Wood DP; Rabah DM; Eastham JA; Scardino PT
Eur Urol; 2014 Apr; 65(4):675-80. PubMed ID: 24035631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Swindle P; Eastham JA; Ohori M; Kattan MW; Wheeler T; Maru N; Slawin K; Scardino PT
J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):903-7. PubMed ID: 16093984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Surgical method influences specimen margins and biochemical recurrence during radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Srougi V; Bessa J; Baghdadi M; Nunes-Silva I; da Costa JB; Garcia-Barreras S; Barret E; Rozet F; Galiano M; Sanchez-Salas R; Cathelineau X
World J Urol; 2017 Oct; 35(10):1481-1488. PubMed ID: 28243789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of positive surgical margins on secondary treatment, palliative radiotherapy and prostate cancer-specific mortality. A population-based study of 13 198 patients.
Kvåle R; Myklebust TÅ; Fosså SD; Aas K; Ekanger C; Helle SI; Honoré A; Møller B
Prostate; 2019 Dec; 79(16):1852-1860. PubMed ID: 31566779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy.
Savdie R; Horvath LG; Benito RP; Rasiah KK; Haynes AM; Chatfield M; Stricker PD; Turner JJ; Delprado W; Henshall SM; Sutherland RL; Kench JG
BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(12):1794-800. PubMed ID: 21992536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Perineural invasion as an independent predictor of biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zhang LJ; Wu B; Zha ZL; Qu W; Zhao H; Yuan J; Feng YJ
BMC Urol; 2018 Feb; 18(1):5. PubMed ID: 29390991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The impact on oncological outcomes after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer of converting soft tissue margins at the apex and bladder neck from tumour-positive to -negative.
Pak S; Park S; Kim M; Go H; Cho YM; Ahn H
BJU Int; 2019 May; 123(5):811-817. PubMed ID: 29978558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Primary Gleason grade 4 at the positive margin is associated with metastasis and death among patients with Gleason 7 prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.
Viers BR; Sukov WR; Gettman MT; Rangel LJ; Bergstralh EJ; Frank I; Tollefson MK; Thompson RH; Boorjian SA; Karnes RJ
Eur Urol; 2014 Dec; 66(6):1116-24. PubMed ID: 25052213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
