These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29766350)

  • 1. An Alternative Interpretation of the Linearly Weighted Kappa Coefficients for Ordinal Data.
    Kvålseth TO
    Psychometrika; 2018 May; ():. PubMed ID: 29766350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hubert's multi-rater kappa revisited.
    Martín Andrés A; Álvarez Hernández M
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Feb; 73(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 31056757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dependence of weighted kappa coefficients on the number of categories.
    Brenner H; Kliebsch U
    Epidemiology; 1996 Mar; 7(2):199-202. PubMed ID: 8834562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Weighted specific-category kappa measure of interobserver agreement.
    Kvålseth TO
    Psychol Rep; 2003 Dec; 93(3 Pt 2):1283-90. PubMed ID: 14765602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Note on the Linearly and Quadratically Weighted Kappa Coefficients.
    Li P
    Psychometrika; 2016 Sep; 81(3):795-801. PubMed ID: 27246436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Weighted least-squares approach for comparing correlated kappa.
    Barnhart HX; Williamson JM
    Biometrics; 2002 Dec; 58(4):1012-9. PubMed ID: 12495157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Weighting schemes and incomplete data: A generalized Bayesian framework for chance-corrected interrater agreement.
    van Oest R; Girard JM
    Psychol Methods; 2022 Dec; 27(6):1069-1088. PubMed ID: 34766799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing the inter-rater agreement for ordinal data through weighted indexes.
    Marasini D; Quatto P; Ripamonti E
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Dec; 25(6):2611-2633. PubMed ID: 24740999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Analyzing interrater agreement for categorical data using Cohen's kappa and alternative coefficients].
    Wirtz M; Kutschmann M
    Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2007 Dec; 46(6):370-7. PubMed ID: 18188809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A New Interpretation of the Weighted Kappa Coefficients.
    Vanbelle S
    Psychometrika; 2016 Jun; 81(2):399-410. PubMed ID: 25516203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measuring Dispersion and Serial Dependence in Ordinal Time Series Based on the Cumulative Paired
    Weiß CH
    Entropy (Basel); 2021 Dec; 24(1):. PubMed ID: 35052068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantifying Interrater Agreement and Reliability Between Thoracic Pathologists: Paradoxical Behavior of Cohen's Kappa in the Presence of a High Prevalence of the Histopathologic Feature in Lung Cancer.
    Tan KS; Yeh YC; Adusumilli PS; Travis WD
    JTO Clin Res Rep; 2024 Jan; 5(1):100618. PubMed ID: 38283651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Standardizing ordinal subadult age indicators: Testing for observer agreement and consistency across modalities.
    Corron LK; Stock MK; Cole SJ; Hulse CN; Garvin HM; Klales AR; Stull KE
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Mar; 320():110687. PubMed ID: 33461006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The analysis of ordinal agreement data: beyond weighted kappa.
    Graham P; Jackson R
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1993 Sep; 46(9):1055-62. PubMed ID: 8263578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Excellent agreement of Norwegian trauma registry data compared to corresponding data in electronic patient records.
    Naberezhneva N; Uleberg O; Dahlhaug M; Giil-Jensen V; Ringdal KG; Røise O
    Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2023 Sep; 31(1):50. PubMed ID: 37752614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Kappa statistics to measure interrater and intrarater agreement for 1790 cervical biopsy specimens among twelve pathologists: qualitative histopathologic analysis and methodologic issues.
    Malpica A; Matisic JP; Niekirk DV; Crum CP; Staerkel GA; Yamal JM; Guillaud MH; Cox DD; Atkinson EN; Adler-Storthz K; Poulin NM; Macaulay CA; Follen M
    Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Dec; 99(3 Suppl 1):S38-52. PubMed ID: 16183106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intra- and interobserver agreement with regard to describing adnexal masses using International Ovarian Tumor Analysis terminology: reproducibility study involving seven observers.
    Zannoni L; Savelli L; Jokubkiene L; Di Legge A; Condous G; Testa AC; Sladkevicius P; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jul; 44(1):100-8. PubMed ID: 24307182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing the reliability of ordered categorical scales using kappa-type statistics.
    Roberts C; McNamee R
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2005 Oct; 14(5):493-514. PubMed ID: 16248350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of Cohen's Kappa and Gwet's AC1 when calculating inter-rater reliability coefficients: a study conducted with personality disorder samples.
    Wongpakaran N; Wongpakaran T; Wedding D; Gwet KL
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Apr; 13():61. PubMed ID: 23627889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Empirical evaluation of SUCRA-based treatment ranks in network meta-analysis: quantifying robustness using Cohen's kappa.
    Daly CH; Neupane B; Beyene J; Thabane L; Straus SE; Hamid JS
    BMJ Open; 2019 Sep; 9(9):e024625. PubMed ID: 31492773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.