199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29767308)
1. Differentiating pseudoprogression from true progression: analysis of radiographic, biologic, and clinical clues in GBM.
Rowe LS; Butman JA; Mackey M; Shih JH; Cooley-Zgela T; Ning H; Gilbert MR; Smart DK; Camphausen K; Krauze AV
J Neurooncol; 2018 Aug; 139(1):145-152. PubMed ID: 29767308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Combination of IVIM-DWI and 3D-ASL for differentiating true progression from pseudoprogression of Glioblastoma multiforme after concurrent chemoradiotherapy: study protocol of a prospective diagnostic trial.
Liu ZC; Yan LF; Hu YC; Sun YZ; Tian Q; Nan HY; Yu Y; Sun Q; Wang W; Cui GB
BMC Med Imaging; 2017 Feb; 17(1):10. PubMed ID: 28143434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The predictive value of absolute lymphocyte counts on tumor progression and pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma.
Xi J; Hassan B; Katumba RGN; Khaddour K; Govindan A; Luo J; Huang J; Campian JL
BMC Cancer; 2021 Mar; 21(1):285. PubMed ID: 33726710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma multiforme using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging with ferumoxytol calls RANO criteria into question.
Nasseri M; Gahramanov S; Netto JP; Fu R; Muldoon LL; Varallyay C; Hamilton BE; Neuwelt EA
Neuro Oncol; 2014 Aug; 16(8):1146-54. PubMed ID: 24523362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Incidence, molecular characteristics, and imaging features of "clinically-defined pseudoprogression" in newly diagnosed glioblastoma treated with chemoradiation.
Hagiwara A; Schlossman J; Shabani S; Raymond C; Tatekawa H; Abrey LE; Garcia J; Chinot O; Saran F; Nishikawa R; Henriksson R; Mason WP; Wick W; Cloughesy TF; Ellingson BM
J Neurooncol; 2022 Sep; 159(3):509-518. PubMed ID: 35842871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Morphologic MRI features, diffusion tensor imaging and radiation dosimetric analysis to differentiate pseudo-progression from early tumor progression.
Agarwal A; Kumar S; Narang J; Schultz L; Mikkelsen T; Wang S; Siddiqui S; Poptani H; Jain R
J Neurooncol; 2013 May; 112(3):413-20. PubMed ID: 23417357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prediction of pseudoprogression in post-treatment glioblastoma using dynamic susceptibility contrast-derived oxygenation and microvascular transit time heterogeneity measures.
Park JE; Kim HS; Kim N; Borra R; Mouridsen K; Hansen MB; Kim YH; Hong CK; Kim JH
Eur Radiol; 2024 May; 34(5):3061-3073. PubMed ID: 37848773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria, contrast enhancement and perfusion MRI for assessing progression in glioblastoma.
Tensaouti F; Khalifa J; Lusque A; Plas B; Lotterie JA; Berry I; Laprie A; Cohen-Jonathan Moyal E; Lubrano V
Neuroradiology; 2017 Oct; 59(10):1013-1020. PubMed ID: 28842741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Differentiation of Pseudoprogression from True Progressionin Glioblastoma Patients after Standard Treatment: A Machine Learning Strategy Combinedwith Radiomics Features from T
Sun YZ; Yan LF; Han Y; Nan HY; Xiao G; Tian Q; Pu WH; Li ZY; Wei XC; Wang W; Cui GB
BMC Med Imaging; 2021 Feb; 21(1):17. PubMed ID: 33535988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Refinement of response assessment in neuro-oncology (RANO) using non-enhancing lesion type and contrast enhancement evolution pattern in IDH wild-type glioblastomas.
Moon HH; Kim HS; Park JE; Kim YH; Kim JH
BMC Cancer; 2021 Jun; 21(1):654. PubMed ID: 34074252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Three-dimensional echo planar spectroscopic imaging for differentiation of true progression from pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma.
Verma G; Chawla S; Mohan S; Wang S; Nasrallah M; Sheriff S; Desai A; Brem S; O'Rourke DM; Wolf RL; Maudsley AA; Poptani H
NMR Biomed; 2019 Feb; 32(2):e4042. PubMed ID: 30556932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Low incidence of pseudoprogression by imaging in newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients treated with cediranib in combination with chemoradiation.
Pinho MC; Polaskova P; Kalpathy-Cramer J; Jennings D; Emblem KE; Jain RK; Rosen BR; Wen PY; Sorensen AG; Batchelor TT; Gerstner ER
Oncologist; 2014 Jan; 19(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 24309981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison between the Prebolus T1 Measurement and the Fixed T1 Value in Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging for the Differentiation of True Progression from Pseudoprogression in Glioblastoma Treated with Concurrent Radiation Therapy and Temozolomide Chemotherapy.
Nam JG; Kang KM; Choi SH; Lim WH; Yoo RE; Kim JH; Yun TJ; Sohn CH
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2017 Dec; 38(12):2243-2250. PubMed ID: 29074633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Combined analysis of MGMT methylation and dynamic-susceptibility-contrast MRI for the distinction between early and pseudo-progression in glioblastoma patients.
Bani-Sadr A; Berner LP; Barritault M; Chamard L; Bidet CM; Eker OF; Hermier M; Guyotat J; Jouanneau E; Meyronet D; Gouttard S; D'Hombres A; Iziquierdo C; Honnorat J; Berthezène Y; Ducray F
Rev Neurol (Paris); 2019 Oct; 175(9):534-543. PubMed ID: 31208813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Late Pseudoprogression in Glioblastoma: Diagnostic Value of Dynamic O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-Tyrosine PET.
Kebir S; Fimmers R; Galldiks N; Schäfer N; Mack F; Schaub C; Stuplich M; Niessen M; Tzaridis T; Simon M; Stoffels G; Langen KJ; Scheffler B; Glas M; Herrlinger U
Clin Cancer Res; 2016 May; 22(9):2190-6. PubMed ID: 26673798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pseudoprogression versus true progression in glioblastoma patients: A multiapproach literature review. Part 2 - Radiological features and metric markers.
Le Fèvre C; Constans JM; Chambrelant I; Antoni D; Bund C; Leroy-Freschini B; Schott R; Cebula H; Noël G
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol; 2021 Mar; 159():103230. PubMed ID: 33515701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Metabolic and physiologic magnetic resonance imaging in distinguishing true progression from pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma.
Chawla S; Bukhari S; Afridi OM; Wang S; Yadav SK; Akbari H; Verma G; Nath K; Haris M; Bagley S; Davatzikos C; Loevner LA; Mohan S
NMR Biomed; 2022 Jul; 35(7):e4719. PubMed ID: 35233862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma: added value of arterial spin labeling to dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MR imaging.
Choi YJ; Kim HS; Jahng GH; Kim SJ; Suh DC
Acta Radiol; 2013 May; 54(4):448-54. PubMed ID: 23592805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pseudoprogression as an adverse event of glioblastoma therapy.
Balaña C; Capellades J; Pineda E; Estival A; Puig J; Domenech S; Verger E; Pujol T; Martinez-García M; Oleaga L; Velarde J; Mesia C; Fuentes R; Marruecos J; Del Barco S; Villà S; Carrato C; Gallego O; Gil-Gil M; Craven-Bartle J; Alameda F;
Cancer Med; 2017 Dec; 6(12):2858-2866. PubMed ID: 29105360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Incorporating diffusion- and perfusion-weighted MRI into a radiomics model improves diagnostic performance for pseudoprogression in glioblastoma patients.
Kim JY; Park JE; Jo Y; Shim WH; Nam SJ; Kim JH; Yoo RE; Choi SH; Kim HS
Neuro Oncol; 2019 Feb; 21(3):404-414. PubMed ID: 30107606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
