These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29767308)

  • 1. Differentiating pseudoprogression from true progression: analysis of radiographic, biologic, and clinical clues in GBM.
    Rowe LS; Butman JA; Mackey M; Shih JH; Cooley-Zgela T; Ning H; Gilbert MR; Smart DK; Camphausen K; Krauze AV
    J Neurooncol; 2018 Aug; 139(1):145-152. PubMed ID: 29767308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Combination of IVIM-DWI and 3D-ASL for differentiating true progression from pseudoprogression of Glioblastoma multiforme after concurrent chemoradiotherapy: study protocol of a prospective diagnostic trial.
    Liu ZC; Yan LF; Hu YC; Sun YZ; Tian Q; Nan HY; Yu Y; Sun Q; Wang W; Cui GB
    BMC Med Imaging; 2017 Feb; 17(1):10. PubMed ID: 28143434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The predictive value of absolute lymphocyte counts on tumor progression and pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma.
    Xi J; Hassan B; Katumba RGN; Khaddour K; Govindan A; Luo J; Huang J; Campian JL
    BMC Cancer; 2021 Mar; 21(1):285. PubMed ID: 33726710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma multiforme using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging with ferumoxytol calls RANO criteria into question.
    Nasseri M; Gahramanov S; Netto JP; Fu R; Muldoon LL; Varallyay C; Hamilton BE; Neuwelt EA
    Neuro Oncol; 2014 Aug; 16(8):1146-54. PubMed ID: 24523362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Incidence, molecular characteristics, and imaging features of "clinically-defined pseudoprogression" in newly diagnosed glioblastoma treated with chemoradiation.
    Hagiwara A; Schlossman J; Shabani S; Raymond C; Tatekawa H; Abrey LE; Garcia J; Chinot O; Saran F; Nishikawa R; Henriksson R; Mason WP; Wick W; Cloughesy TF; Ellingson BM
    J Neurooncol; 2022 Sep; 159(3):509-518. PubMed ID: 35842871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Morphologic MRI features, diffusion tensor imaging and radiation dosimetric analysis to differentiate pseudo-progression from early tumor progression.
    Agarwal A; Kumar S; Narang J; Schultz L; Mikkelsen T; Wang S; Siddiqui S; Poptani H; Jain R
    J Neurooncol; 2013 May; 112(3):413-20. PubMed ID: 23417357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prediction of pseudoprogression in post-treatment glioblastoma using dynamic susceptibility contrast-derived oxygenation and microvascular transit time heterogeneity measures.
    Park JE; Kim HS; Kim N; Borra R; Mouridsen K; Hansen MB; Kim YH; Hong CK; Kim JH
    Eur Radiol; 2024 May; 34(5):3061-3073. PubMed ID: 37848773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria, contrast enhancement and perfusion MRI for assessing progression in glioblastoma.
    Tensaouti F; Khalifa J; Lusque A; Plas B; Lotterie JA; Berry I; Laprie A; Cohen-Jonathan Moyal E; Lubrano V
    Neuroradiology; 2017 Oct; 59(10):1013-1020. PubMed ID: 28842741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differentiation of Pseudoprogression from True Progressionin Glioblastoma Patients after Standard Treatment: A Machine Learning Strategy Combinedwith Radiomics Features from T
    Sun YZ; Yan LF; Han Y; Nan HY; Xiao G; Tian Q; Pu WH; Li ZY; Wei XC; Wang W; Cui GB
    BMC Med Imaging; 2021 Feb; 21(1):17. PubMed ID: 33535988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Refinement of response assessment in neuro-oncology (RANO) using non-enhancing lesion type and contrast enhancement evolution pattern in IDH wild-type glioblastomas.
    Moon HH; Kim HS; Park JE; Kim YH; Kim JH
    BMC Cancer; 2021 Jun; 21(1):654. PubMed ID: 34074252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three-dimensional echo planar spectroscopic imaging for differentiation of true progression from pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma.
    Verma G; Chawla S; Mohan S; Wang S; Nasrallah M; Sheriff S; Desai A; Brem S; O'Rourke DM; Wolf RL; Maudsley AA; Poptani H
    NMR Biomed; 2019 Feb; 32(2):e4042. PubMed ID: 30556932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Low incidence of pseudoprogression by imaging in newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients treated with cediranib in combination with chemoradiation.
    Pinho MC; Polaskova P; Kalpathy-Cramer J; Jennings D; Emblem KE; Jain RK; Rosen BR; Wen PY; Sorensen AG; Batchelor TT; Gerstner ER
    Oncologist; 2014 Jan; 19(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 24309981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison between the Prebolus T1 Measurement and the Fixed T1 Value in Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging for the Differentiation of True Progression from Pseudoprogression in Glioblastoma Treated with Concurrent Radiation Therapy and Temozolomide Chemotherapy.
    Nam JG; Kang KM; Choi SH; Lim WH; Yoo RE; Kim JH; Yun TJ; Sohn CH
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2017 Dec; 38(12):2243-2250. PubMed ID: 29074633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Combined analysis of MGMT methylation and dynamic-susceptibility-contrast MRI for the distinction between early and pseudo-progression in glioblastoma patients.
    Bani-Sadr A; Berner LP; Barritault M; Chamard L; Bidet CM; Eker OF; Hermier M; Guyotat J; Jouanneau E; Meyronet D; Gouttard S; D'Hombres A; Iziquierdo C; Honnorat J; Berthezène Y; Ducray F
    Rev Neurol (Paris); 2019 Oct; 175(9):534-543. PubMed ID: 31208813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Late Pseudoprogression in Glioblastoma: Diagnostic Value of Dynamic O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-Tyrosine PET.
    Kebir S; Fimmers R; Galldiks N; Schäfer N; Mack F; Schaub C; Stuplich M; Niessen M; Tzaridis T; Simon M; Stoffels G; Langen KJ; Scheffler B; Glas M; Herrlinger U
    Clin Cancer Res; 2016 May; 22(9):2190-6. PubMed ID: 26673798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pseudoprogression versus true progression in glioblastoma patients: A multiapproach literature review. Part 2 - Radiological features and metric markers.
    Le Fèvre C; Constans JM; Chambrelant I; Antoni D; Bund C; Leroy-Freschini B; Schott R; Cebula H; Noël G
    Crit Rev Oncol Hematol; 2021 Mar; 159():103230. PubMed ID: 33515701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Metabolic and physiologic magnetic resonance imaging in distinguishing true progression from pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma.
    Chawla S; Bukhari S; Afridi OM; Wang S; Yadav SK; Akbari H; Verma G; Nath K; Haris M; Bagley S; Davatzikos C; Loevner LA; Mohan S
    NMR Biomed; 2022 Jul; 35(7):e4719. PubMed ID: 35233862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma: added value of arterial spin labeling to dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MR imaging.
    Choi YJ; Kim HS; Jahng GH; Kim SJ; Suh DC
    Acta Radiol; 2013 May; 54(4):448-54. PubMed ID: 23592805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Incorporating diffusion- and perfusion-weighted MRI into a radiomics model improves diagnostic performance for pseudoprogression in glioblastoma patients.
    Kim JY; Park JE; Jo Y; Shim WH; Nam SJ; Kim JH; Yoo RE; Choi SH; Kim HS
    Neuro Oncol; 2019 Feb; 21(3):404-414. PubMed ID: 30107606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pseudoprogression in GBM versus true progression in patients with glioblastoma: A multiapproach analysis.
    Sidibe I; Tensaouti F; Gilhodes J; Cabarrou B; Filleron T; Desmoulin F; Ken S; Noël G; Truc G; Sunyach MP; Charissoux M; Magné N; Lotterie JA; Roques M; Péran P; Cohen-Jonathan Moyal E; Laprie A
    Radiother Oncol; 2023 Apr; 181():109486. PubMed ID: 36706959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.