130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2976774)
1. Comparison of Dacron-tipped applicator and cytobrush for detection of chlamydial infections.
Weiland TL; Noller KL; Smith TF; Ory SJ
J Clin Microbiol; 1988 Nov; 26(11):2437-8. PubMed ID: 2976774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cytobrush versus swab endocervical sampling for the detection of obstetric chlamydial infection.
Grossman JH; Rivlin ME; Morrison JC
Am J Perinatol; 1993 Jan; 10(1):76-8. PubMed ID: 8442808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of cotton wool swab and cytobrush for detection of chlamydial infection in women attending a genitourinary medicine clinic.
Mandal D; Ray TK; Richmond SJ; Goorney BP; Haye KR
Int J STD AIDS; 1991; 2(1):49-51. PubMed ID: 2036461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Opportunistic screening for Chlamydia trachomatis cervicitis: the value of cytobrush specimens for detection by PCR compared with cell culture.
Wandall DA; Ostergaard L; Overgaard L; Worm AM; Gutschik E
APMIS; 1998 May; 106(5):580-4. PubMed ID: 9674896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of the Cytobrush for concurrent endocervical cytology and chlamydia sampling.
Szarewski A; Pompey A; Bertrand J; Bradbeer C
Genitourin Med; 1990 Jun; 66(3):205-7. PubMed ID: 2370065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of cytobrushes with swabs for recovery of endocervical cells and for Chlamydiazyme detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.
Kellogg JA; Seiple JW; Klinedinst JL; Levisky JS
J Clin Microbiol; 1992 Nov; 30(11):2988-90. PubMed ID: 1452671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of a new amplified enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in male urine, female endocervical swab, and patient obtained vaginal swab specimens.
Tanaka M; Nakayama H; Sagiyama K; Haraoka M; Yoshida H; Hagiwara T; Akazawa K; Naito S
J Clin Pathol; 2000 May; 53(5):350-4. PubMed ID: 10889816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis cervical infection: a comparison of Papanicolaou and immunofluorescent staining in smears obtained by Ayre's spatula and cytobrush.
Maeda MY; Longatto Filho A; Santos DR; Cavaliere MJ; Shih LW; Oyafuso MS; De Andrea Filho A
Pathologica; 1991; 83(1083):105-9. PubMed ID: 1714070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The value of the Cytobrush for obtaining cells from the uterine cervix.
Kawaguchi K; Nogi M; Ohya M; Nishikawa Y; Kobayashi TK
Diagn Cytopathol; 1987 Sep; 3(3):262-7. PubMed ID: 3665693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The efficiency of the Cytobrush versus the cotton swab in the collection of endocervical cells in cervical smears.
Trimbos JB; Arentz NP
Acta Cytol; 1986; 30(3):261-3. PubMed ID: 3521175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of cytobrush and cotton swab sampling for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by cell culture.
Lees MI; Newnan DM; Plackett M; Traynor PW; Forsyth JR; Garland SM
Genitourin Med; 1990 Aug; 66(4):267-9. PubMed ID: 2202656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of self-collected samples in contrast to practitioner-collected samples for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis by polymerase chain reaction among women living in remote areas.
Knox J; Tabrizi SN; Miller P; Petoumenos K; Law M; Chen S; Garland SM
Sex Transm Dis; 2002 Nov; 29(11):647-54. PubMed ID: 12438900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Cytobrush effect on Pap smear adequacy.
Davey-Sullivan B; Gearhart J; Evers CG; Cason Z; Replogle WH
Fam Pract Res J; 1991 Mar; 11(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 2028815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sampling for Chlamydia trachomatis infection - a comparison of vaginal, first-catch urine, combined vaginal and first-catch urine and endocervical sampling.
Falk L; Coble BI; Mjörnberg PA; Fredlund H
Int J STD AIDS; 2010 Apr; 21(4):283-7. PubMed ID: 20378903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cytobrush in collection of cervical specimens for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.
Moncada J; Schachter J; Shipp M; Bolan G; Wilber J
J Clin Microbiol; 1989 Aug; 27(8):1863-6. PubMed ID: 2671035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is one swab enough to detect chlamydial infection of the cervix?
Munday PE; Carder JM; Hanna NF; Taylor-Robinson D
Br J Vener Dis; 1984 Dec; 60(6):384-6. PubMed ID: 6518349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of cytobrush with cotton swab for endocervical cytologic sampling.
Neinstein LS; Rabinovitz S; Recalde A
J Adolesc Health Care; 1989 Jul; 10(4):305-7. PubMed ID: 2732111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of the Cytobrush for concurrent cytology and chlamydia sampling: a comparison of immunofluorescence and culture for detection of chlamydia.
Szarewski A; Pompey A; Cronin D; Bertrand J; Bradbeer C; Thin RN
Int J STD AIDS; 1991; 2(5):367-8. PubMed ID: 1958724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improved PCR detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by using an altered method of specimen transport and high-quality endocervical specimens.
Kellogg JA; Seiple JW; Klinedinst JL; Stroll ES; Cavanaugh SH
J Clin Microbiol; 1995 Oct; 33(10):2765-7. PubMed ID: 8567922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of cytobrush and cotton swab for Papanicolaou smears in pregnancy.
Rivlin ME; Woodliff JM; Bowlin RB; Moore JL; Martin RW; Grossman JH; Morrison JC
J Reprod Med; 1993 Feb; 38(2):147-50. PubMed ID: 8445608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
