These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29767760)

  • 21. Influence of menu labeling on food choices in real-life settings: a systematic review.
    Fernandes AC; Oliveira RC; Proença RP; Curioni CC; Rodrigues VM; Fiates GM
    Nutr Rev; 2016 Aug; 74(8):534-48. PubMed ID: 27358442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Single-larger-portion-size and dual-column nutrition labeling may help consumers make more healthful food choices.
    Lando AM; Lo SC
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2013 Feb; 113(2):241-50. PubMed ID: 23351627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Food Environment Interventions to Improve the Dietary Behavior of Young Adults in Tertiary Education Settings: A Systematic Literature Review.
    Roy R; Kelly B; Rangan A; Allman-Farinelli M
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2015 Oct; 115(10):1647-81.e1. PubMed ID: 26271691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Organic food labels bias food healthiness perceptions: Estimating healthiness equivalence using a Discrete Choice Experiment.
    Richetin J; Caputo V; Demartini E; Conner M; Perugini M
    Appetite; 2022 May; 172():105970. PubMed ID: 35150793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The impact of image-size manipulation and sugar content on children's cereal consumption.
    Neyens E; Aerts G; Smits T
    Appetite; 2015 Dec; 95():152-7. PubMed ID: 26162951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The impact of traffic light color-coding on food health perceptions and choice.
    Trudel R; Murray KB; Kim S; Chen S
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2015 Sep; 21(3):255-75. PubMed ID: 26121372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Calorie labeling in a rural middle school influences food selection: findings from community-based participatory research.
    Hunsberger M; McGinnis P; Smith J; Beamer BA; O'Malley J
    J Obes; 2015; 2015():531690. PubMed ID: 25874121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A nudge in a healthy direction. The effect of nutrition labels on food purchasing behaviors in university dining facilities.
    Cioffi CE; Levitsky DA; Pacanowski CR; Bertz F
    Appetite; 2015 Sep; 92():7-14. PubMed ID: 25913685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A review of evidence supporting current strategies, challenges, and opportunities to reduce portion sizes.
    Almiron-Roig E; Forde CG; Hollands GJ; Vargas MÁ; Brunstrom JM
    Nutr Rev; 2020 Feb; 78(2):91-114. PubMed ID: 31504856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of single serving versus entire package nutritional information on consumption norms and actual consumption of a snack food.
    Antonuk B; Block LG
    J Nutr Educ Behav; 2006; 38(6):365-70. PubMed ID: 17142193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Do nutrition labels influence healthier food choices? Analysis of label viewing behaviour and subsequent food purchases in a labelling intervention trial.
    Ni Mhurchu C; Eyles H; Jiang Y; Blakely T
    Appetite; 2018 Feb; 121():360-365. PubMed ID: 29191745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of nutrition label format and product assortment on the healthfulness of food choice.
    Aschemann-Witzel J; Grunert KG; van Trijp HC; Bialkova S; Raats MM; Hodgkins C; Wasowicz-Kirylo G; Koenigstorfer J
    Appetite; 2013 Dec; 71():63-74. PubMed ID: 23891558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Visual illusions and plate design: the effects of plate rim widths and rim coloring on perceived food portion size.
    McClain AD; van den Bos W; Matheson D; Desai M; McClure SM; Robinson TN
    Int J Obes (Lond); 2014 May; 38(5):657-62. PubMed ID: 24005858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Food labels: a critical assessment.
    Temple NJ; Fraser J
    Nutrition; 2014 Mar; 30(3):257-60. PubMed ID: 24139165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Consumers' Response to an On-Shelf Nutrition Labelling System in Supermarkets: Evidence to Inform Policy and Practice.
    Hobin E; Bollinger B; Sacco J; Liebman E; Vanderlee L; Zuo F; Rosella L; L'abbe M; Manson H; Hammond D
    Milbank Q; 2017 Sep; 95(3):494-534. PubMed ID: 28895220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. What to do about portion sizes? Roundtable discussion at the Forefronts in Portion Size Conference.
    Raynor HA
    Int J Obes (Lond); 2014 Jul; 38 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S34-6. PubMed ID: 25033962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Influence of simplified nutrition labeling and taxation on laboratory energy intake in adults.
    Temple JL; Johnson KM; Archer K; Lacarte A; Yi C; Epstein LH
    Appetite; 2011 Aug; 57(1):184-92. PubMed ID: 21569807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The impact of interpretive and reductive front-of-pack labels on food choice and willingness to pay.
    Talati Z; Norman R; Pettigrew S; Neal B; Kelly B; Dixon H; Ball K; Miller C; Shilton T
    Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2017 Dec; 14(1):171. PubMed ID: 29258543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Double trouble: Portion size and energy density combine to increase preschool children's lunch intake.
    Kling SM; Roe LS; Keller KL; Rolls BJ
    Physiol Behav; 2016 Aug; 162():18-26. PubMed ID: 26879105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Food and the consumer: could labelling be the answer?
    Kerr MA; McCann MT; Livingstone MB
    Proc Nutr Soc; 2015 May; 74(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 25998678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.