These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29768579)

  • 1. [Cost-effectiveness analysis of spontaneous vaginal delivery and elective cesarean for normal risk pregnant women in the Brazilian Unified National Health System].
    Entringer AP; Pinto M; Dias MAB; Gomes MASM
    Cad Saude Publica; 2018 May; 34(5):e00022517. PubMed ID: 29768579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Costs analysis of hospital care for vaginal delivery and elective caesarean section for usual risk pregnant women in the Brazilian Unified National Health System.
    Entringer AP; Pinto MFT; Gomes MASM
    Cien Saude Colet; 2019 Apr; 24(4):1527-1536. PubMed ID: 31066854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Elective cesarean section or not? Maternal age and risk of adverse outcomes at term: a population-based registry study of low-risk primiparous women.
    Herstad L; Klungsøyr K; Skjærven R; Tanbo T; Forsén L; Åbyholm T; Vangen S
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Aug; 16():230. PubMed ID: 27535233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The cost-effectiveness of elective Cesarean delivery for HIV-infected women with detectable HIV RNA during pregnancy.
    Mrus JM; Goldie SJ; Weinstein MC; Tsevat J
    AIDS; 2000 Nov; 14(16):2543-52. PubMed ID: 11101066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost-effectiveness analysis of natural birth and elective C-section in supplemental health.
    Entringer AP; Pinto M; Gomes MASM
    Rev Saude Publica; 2018 Nov; 52():91. PubMed ID: 30484479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation versus expectant management for low-risk nulliparous women: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Hersh AR; Skeith AE; Sargent JA; Caughey AB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jun; 220(6):590.e1-590.e10. PubMed ID: 30768934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cesarean delivery on demand: what will it cost?
    Bost BW
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 188(6):1418-21; discussion 1421-3. PubMed ID: 12824972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Delivery for women with a previous cesarean: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF).
    Sentilhes L; Vayssière C; Beucher G; Deneux-Tharaux C; Deruelle P; Diemunsch P; Gallot D; Haumonté JB; Heimann S; Kayem G; Lopez E; Parant O; Schmitz T; Sellier Y; Rozenberg P; d'Ercole C
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Sep; 170(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 23810846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Risk of uterine rupture and adverse perinatal outcome at term after cesarean delivery.
    Spong CY; Landon MB; Gilbert S; Rouse DJ; Leveno KJ; Varner MW; Moawad AH; Simhan HN; Harper M; Wapner RJ; Sorokin Y; Miodovnik M; Carpenter M; Peaceman AM; O'Sullivan MJ; Sibai BM; Langer O; Thorp JM; Ramin SM; Mercer BM;
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Oct; 110(4):801-7. PubMed ID: 17906012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effectiveness and costs of elective cesarean delivery for fetal macrosomia diagnosed by ultrasound.
    Rouse DJ; Owen J; Goldenberg RL; Cliver SP
    JAMA; 1996 Nov; 276(18):1480-6. PubMed ID: 8903259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pelvic floor consequences of cesarean delivery on maternal request in women with a single birth: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Xu X; Ivy JS; Patel DA; Patel SN; Smith DG; Ransom SB; Fenner D; Delancey JO
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2010 Jan; 19(1):147-60. PubMed ID: 20088671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of attempted vaginal compared with planned cesarean delivery in triplet gestations.
    Lappen JR; Hackney DN; Bailit JL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 215(4):493.e1-6. PubMed ID: 27166014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Economic Analysis of Induction versus Elective Cesarean in Term Nulliparas with Supermorbid Obesity.
    Nehme L; Horgan R; Waller J; Kumar P; Barake C; Huang JC; Saade G; Kawakita T
    Am J Perinatol; 2024 May; 41(S 01):e2878-e2885. PubMed ID: 37949098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does a Cesarean section delivery always cost more than a vaginal delivery?
    Kazandjian VA; Chaulk CP; Ogunbo S; Wicker K
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2007 Feb; 13(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 17286718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of obstetrical interventions in women with vaginal and cesarean section delivered: cross-sectional study in a reference tertiary center in the Northeast of Brazil.
    Medeiros MQ; Lima PHM; Augusto CLC; Viana BJA; Pinheiro BAK; Peixoto AB; Araujo Júnior E; Carvalho CFH
    Ceska Gynekol; 2019; 84(3):201-207. PubMed ID: 31324110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of the mode of delivery on maternal and neonatal outcomes: a comparison between elective cesarean section and planned vaginal delivery in a low-risk obstetric population.
    Bodner K; Wierrani F; Grünberger W; Bodner-Adler B
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Jun; 283(6):1193-8. PubMed ID: 20505947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Maternal and neonatal morbidity after elective repeat Cesarean delivery versus a trial of labor after previous Cesarean delivery in a community teaching hospital.
    Loebel G; Zelop CM; Egan JF; Wax J
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2004 Apr; 15(4):243-6. PubMed ID: 15280132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Quality assessment of labor care provided in the Unified Health System in Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil, 1999-2001].
    Oliveira MI; Dias MA; Cunha CB; Leal Mdo C
    Rev Saude Publica; 2008 Oct; 42(5):895-902. PubMed ID: 18833388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Elective cesarean delivery at 38 and 39 weeks: neonatal and maternal risks.
    Glavind J; Uldbjerg N
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Apr; 27(2):121-7. PubMed ID: 25689238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cumulative economic implications of initial method of delivery.
    Allen VM; O'Connell CM; Baskett TF
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 108(3 Pt 1):549-55. PubMed ID: 16946214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.